Stop W.H.O. Vaccines & PCR – End Untested & Unsafe Emergency Use Listing Products (EUL)

Interest of Justice v. WHO, Costa Rica, and United States

Nature of the Dispute:

Parties Involved:

1. Interest of Justice: The Claimant, a civil society international organization dedicated to protecting human rights and holding international organizations with their Member States accountable for unlawful conduct.
2. World Health Organization (WHO): The wrongdoer, accused of authorizing the procurement and use of investigational vaccines under the Emergency Use Listing procedure without ensuring adequate safety standards, informed consent, or transparency in disclosing known risks.
3. Government of Costa Rica: The wrongdoer, accused of violating its own biomedical research laws by signing procurement contracts for EUL-authorized vaccines without ensuring proper informed consent and without complying with legal requirements for safety guarantees in public health interventions.
4. Government of the United States: The wrongdoer, accused of participating in the global distribution and administration of investigational vaccines without properly informing citizens of the risks involved in receiving such vaccines under the EUL, leading to serious harm.

Statement of Facts:

1. WHO Authorization of Unproven Interventions: The WHO, through its Emergency Use Listing (EUL) procedure, authorized the use of investigational vaccines during the global pandemic. These vaccines, developed and distributed without full approval or comprehensive safety trials, were integrated into national vaccine schedules by countries such as Costa Rica and the United States.
2. Waiver of Good Manufacturing Inspections and Safety Standards: Under the EUL mechanism, and "regulatory flexibility" WHO waived many of the good manufacturing inspections and safety protocols that would typically apply to vaccines. This waiver led to the distribution of vaccines that had not undergone sufficient testing to establish their long-term safety or efficacy.
3. Lack of Informed Consent: Costa Rica, the United States and most WHO Member States integrated the WHO-authorized vaccines into their national vaccine schedules without ensuring that citizens were properly informed of the experimental nature of the vaccines and the potential risks to life and health. Informed consent, a core requirement under international human rights law and national biomedical laws, was disregarded.
4. Serious Breaches of National and International Law:
   • In Costa Rica, and many Member States procurement contracts for the investigational vaccines were signed without compliance with national laws requiring insurance for vaccine-related injuries and without proper risk disclosure.
   • In the United States, federal health authorities pushed for widespread use of EUL-authorized vaccines without providing the public with sufficient warnings about known risks, in breach of U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations and the Nuremberg Code’s principles regarding human experimentation.
5. Adverse Health Consequences: Many thousands, if not millions, of individuals in Costa Rica, the United States and globally suffered adverse health effects as a direct result of the widespread and systematic administration of these unproven vaccines. Reports of severe side effects, including life-threatening complications, have emerged, and many affected individuals claim they were not adequately informed of the risks prior to receiving the vaccines.

Legal Basis for the Claims:

1. Breach of International Law:
   • Violation of the Right to Life and Health: The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR), Siracusa Principles and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights guarantee the right to life and the right to health. By authorizing and distributing vaccines under the EUL without sufficient safety guarantees, the WHO, Costa Rica, the United States and most Member States violated these fundamental rights.
   • Nuremberg Code Violations: The administration of investigational vaccines without informed consent constitutes a violation of the Nuremberg Code, which explicitly prohibits human experimentation without voluntary and informed consent. Costa Rica, the United States and most Member States administered these unproven vaccines without ensuring informed consent, thus breaching international legal standards.
2. Breach of National Laws:
   • Costa Rican Biomedical Research Laws: Costa Rica’s national biomedical research regulations explicitly prohibit the procurement and use of investigational medical products without prior insurance for injuries and proper informed consent. By signing contracts and integrating EUL vaccines into its vaccine schedule, Costa Rica breached these laws, causing harm to its citizens.
   • U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Regulations: The FDA’s regulatory framework mandates that any investigational medical product used under emergency conditions must be accompanied by full disclosure of the known risks. By failing to inform the public of the risks of the EUL vaccines, U.S. authorities violated these regulations and endangered public health.
3. Breach of WHO’s Own Standards:
   • Failure to Ensure Safety: WHO's International Health Regulations (IHR) and internal guidelines require that all health interventions authorized for global use must comply with strict safety and efficacy standards. By waiving manufacturing inspections and distributing vaccines without adequate safety data, the WHO acted outside its mandate and violated its own obligations.
   • Waiver of Immunity in Commercial Agreements: WHO has engaged in contractual agreements with vaccine manufacturers, governments, and other stakeholders under the EUL. These contracts of a commercial nature may require waivers of immunity, allowing WHO to be held accountable for failure to ensure product safety or for harm caused by their investigational interventions.

Relief Sought:

1. Damages: Interest of Justice seeks compensatory and punitive damages for serious delays in justice, and for individuals harmed by the investigational vaccines in Costa Rica and the United States, including compensation for medical expenses, loss of income, and pain and suffering.
2. Injunction: Interest of Justice seeks an injunction to halt the continued use of EUL-authorized vaccines in national vaccine schedules, and the WHO EUL Listing until they undergo full regulatory approval and safety testing in accordance with international and national legal standards.
3. Public Apology and Reparation: Interest of Justice demands a public apology owed erga omnes from WHO, Costa Rica, the United States and all wrongdoer Member States for their roles in exposing citizens to harmful investigational vaccines without adequate informed consent. The parties must establish a compensation fund for those affected by vaccine-related injuries and make provisions to compensate and cease censorship of medical and other opinion involving public health.
4. Revocation of EUL Authorization: Interest of Justice seeks the immediate revocation and GLOBAL DELISTING of WHO’s EUL for the mRNA vaccines & PCR in question, along with a full investigation into the breaches of safety and consent protocols.

Conclusion: