Petition to
Protest The W.H.O. Draft Pandemic Treaty!
Letter to
Dear WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB),
Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB.
1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the "WHO CA+" supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus.
3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: "tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also "strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions."
4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The "WHO CA+" repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11)
Pandemic - 112 times
Recovery - 52 times
Response - 106 times
Public Health - 44 times
Preparedness - 74 times
Equity - 32 times
Prevention - 68 times
Pandemic Response Products - 27 times
IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The "WHO CA+" never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn't they have a role in public health instruments?
5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the "WHO CA+" advocates for a "global peer review mechanism" to assess each nation's preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the "Governing Body" of the "WHO CA+" will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I believe this would create mandatory unnecessary meddling into the sovereign affairs of the member states. IHR protects nations right to create their own sovereign legislation for health policy, which includes preparedness assessments that varies country to country. It also creates a burden on member states and serves no legitimate purpose, contrary to public interest.
6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the "WHO CA+" is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide "pandemic response products.' Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad decisions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO.
7. I protest the lack of willingness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, Civil Society Organizations (CSO's), primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -"Enhance WHO's central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;"
8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of "a national One Health Action Plan" which, in the human and animal sectors: "optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world "no one is safe until a needle in every arm", and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholders who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders.
9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the "WHO CA+" that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a "Governing Body" ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties. This body is presumably bloated and expensive whilst essentially redundant and unnecessary.
10. I protest Page 13 - "Central role of WHO - As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.' This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO's oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO's presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems!
11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders that spoke at the first pandemic treaty hearing April 12,13, 2022, and the second hearing by video, such as Interest of Justice and others are included in a meaningful way.
Thank you,
Updates
Interest of Justice
Started this petition
6 months ago
10,978 comments on “Protest The W.H.O. Draft Pandemic Treaty!”
Obvious.
Absolutely NOT. I will not allow threats to be masked as safety measures. My BODY, MY CHOICE.
Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,
My body my choice..
this is bullshit
This is an evil that must be stopped!!!
Freedom & Justice
These are criminals and deserve to be put to death for their crimes against humanity
I disagree with the World Health Organization having control over my rights and freedoms to choose.
I value my right to make my own health choices, and object to any government actions resulting in transfering my rights to an unelected body I have no say in, such as the WHO.
This is a veiled attempt to control the movement & freedom of humanity. Free speech and dissent of opinions against the narrative are at stake.
This WHO CA+ needs to be placed in the trash along with the SCUM that is proposing it! I say NO to this!
I am signing to stand against this agreement. This is against my freedoms as an American Citizen and a child of God.
I believe the W.H.O. serves the interest of the cooperate few that fund the W.H.O. and not the people of the world. The organization has been wrong over the course of this sham we all have been living thru. A corrupt organization can not be trusted with power over the people.
I don’t trust the WHO.
we don;t want this we don;t need this We all know it is about control and your bloody mandates
Stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. I did not give my rights away to the world health organization, and did not vote for WHO. I won’t be complying with vaccine passports, nor will I be taking any vaccines.
I don’t support the WHO telling the US what to do
I want to
COVID IS TREATABLE WITH NATURAL METHODS AND THE STATISTICS HAVE SHOWN THAT SURVIVAL RATES ARE ABOUT THE SAME AS SURVIVAL RATES FOR THE FLU. AND, governmental agencies and their employees (who receive monies) for pushing these policies, have no rights to tell me how to manage my personal health.
I am signing because the more important the decision the more choice the individual should have.
I believe the WHO should have no right to track us or force vaccines on us
The WHO has no right to monitor and control my health choice
STOP
Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,
I care about our freedom!!
We should be consulted on issues affecting us.
The Corrupt W.H.O. has no authority over the citizens of the United States, NOW OR EVER!!!!!!
I want this stopped
I am signing because I oppose the loss of sovereignty of nations, and do not believe the empty assurances that such a thing will not happen.
The virus was never isolated. The PCR tests were fraudulent and used to shut down businesses and schools . This injustice must never happen again.
No need treaty. There is no pandemic. There was no pandemic. No need treaty. Need justice.
The WHO pandemic treaty is not valid because it has excluded outside participation. The world already rejected such a treaty earlier in 2022. This secretive attempt to control the world population is a crime of gigantic proportions, designed to give The WHO tyrannical powers, stripping nations of their sovereignty.
The WHO is unelected body acting as a global despot.
I want to stop the W.H.O pandemic Treaty of the week of December 5, 2022.
The WHO pandemic response was horrific, and I have no trust in a corrupt International organization who is not accountable to the US people. These illegal amendments should not be accepted by any reasonable country.
Canada is sovergin onto itself. It has its own incompetent medical administration that will answer to Canadians. We do not need an unaccountable body directing global health concerns when they have shown great stupidity
Public trust in the World Health Organization has been destroyed due to incompetent mishandling of the C-19 pandemic, the greed, corruption and conflicts of interest that plague the organization, and the CCP’s excessive influence in all WHO decision making. The pandemic has finally exposed the true motivations of this unelected, undemocratic body. The WHO CA+ has absolutely no relevance to the health and well-being of humanity. It is about totalitarian control and an enormous transfer of wealth. Since it has been drafted in secrecy to the exclusion of global stakeholders, it is null and void. Humanity will respond to globalist tyranny with resounding non-compliance.
No pandemic treaty
Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,
I care about my children!
We do not need WHO parents – we are all grown up and doing fine thank you
We need to STOP this WHO Pandemic Treaty. I do not agree with anything the WHO proposes.
I do NOT support the WHO initiatives and documents. The USA is a sovereign nation and should NOT support the WHO.
It is wrong
You idiots have no place in my life nor do you have the proper knowledge of my physical needs to determine what is right for other countries and other individuals.
We need to stop the Pandemic Treaty draft that is to be released. No information has been released and we need to have a say in it. It affects us all
The WHO is a terrorist organization, period. They’re all guilty of crimes against humanity, as are the politicians who enforce their baseless “health policies”. The Nuremberg Code was established for a reason. These criminals have now been exposed, and the consequences they face will be severe.
Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you, Carolina Shahverdiyeva Shahverdiyevac@gmail.com
This is illegal, unconstitutional and it’s NOT going to happen!
DOWN WITH SCHWAB AND WEF, Harari and OBAMA and WHO
The WHO is not elected by one individual around this globe we call Earth and it is past time for them to be interfering in any country, and need to be defunded and DISBANDED.
Stop medical tyranny
No treaty for pandemics should involve forced vaccines or lockdowns.
I am signing because I want to STOP the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty. We have not been included in the making of this.
The last, going on three years, has been a blatant display of zero regard for human rights by people we put in power with our money. This has to stop and I’m willing to die to make that so.
Stop the drafting of the Pandemic Treaty
we will not be injected with your poisons. humanity is onto you. you will be destroyed. Karmic law is inescapable.
I cannot risk another adverse reaction, especially on a “vaccine” that doesn’t stop infection or transmission.
This is a huge money/ power grab by elites that are owned by big Pharma
Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,
are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,
The pandemic response vaccination rollout as admitted by Pfizer themselves failed to stop transmission, failed to stop people succumbing to the ‘virus’ and was NOT Safe and Effective….why in Gods name would the WHO continue to promote a ‘pandemic response’ that has glaringly failed humanity; one that has caused countless deaths and injuries through a vaccine that has still not been inconclusively proven safe ….indeed that has no complete trial data to prove safety or efficacy. The WHO needs to step down while true scientific research is completed and then their ‘pandemic response’ plan needs to be thoroughly investigated and actions bought to public accountability .
Because this is so clandestine and only including those who support it. Again, America is a sovereign country and we want to remain so without foreign powers shoving regulations on us that we have NOT voted for.
I’m opposed to all vaccine mandates and so called vaccine passports. These injections are ineffective and extremely dangerous.
I am againsed the Pandemic Treaty
We do not need any further legally binding documents empowering the W H O to grab power and rule our daily life . Leave us alone and give us back our knowledge about nature and natural remedies
STOP the totalitarian intrusion of the WHO into our health issues!
There is no need for a pandemic treaty.
Unelected officials have no business making laws, including binding treaties.
Time for the WHO to stop hiding their genocidal policies
I am signing because the WHO has no right to adopt the WHO Pandemic Treaty the week of December 5,2022 which would be harmful to the whole world population.
I completely disagree with giving the WHO such arbitrary powers over sovereign countries and humanity. This must not be allowed! WHO can no be trusted.
I do not want the WHO in charge of the United States health care or MY health care!
I am signing because the WHO Pandemic Treaty is a fraud and a farce and will end the power of sovereign nations to govern themselves. It is nothing but a naked power grab by the psychotic, power-hungry global elites
I am opposed to any Pandemic treaty and believe in sovereignty and independence. People are not cookie cutter one size fits all and these agencies are NOT following the true science! These vaccines are ineffective and dangerous with documented side effects! Many people have “died suddenly”!
Tyranny is not acceptable.
they have done wrong
To prevent foreign intervention in my country!
These actions only benefit the pharmaceutical companies and not individuals. Natural immunity, early treatment, vitamins, supplements, homeopathic medicines, etc are all not mentioned.
No outside organization has a right to decide health care policy in this country
This organisation is demonstrably corrupt and these amendments clearly breachbthe autonomy of the individual and their human rights.
What you are doing is unmitigatedly evil.
I choose my healthcare plan, not WHO. If their plan is so good I would choose it BUT they have NO AUTHORITY to choose for me. The people of the world never elected these people/groups to make us rules for us. We will choose the people/plans for our health ourselves.
This is not a treaty, it is a manipulatively and falsely premised and secret document, enforcing the secret agenda of psychopathic individuals who have relinquished their sanity for the sake of power based on insatiable greed and boundless evil.
I am signing because I do not want the WHO to have any involvement in any Pandemic. They showed how useless they were in the with covid. All their recommendations were harmful and they prevented useful remedies from being used.
This is not equitable.
The WHO Pandemic Treaty must be stopped!
The USA should not hand over our sovereignty to incompetent idiots or anyone else.
We’re going to stop government criminality?
This is being done in secret and without citizens voting for this
I have no desire for a private body to regulate me. We require transparency and debate.
This pandemic treaty needs to be stopped, as it would take away each nations soveirnty away, and allow the wicked WHO to promoted their lies and control over everyone. Just another bunch of Nazi’s.
The “WHO” Pandemic Treaty” is just as bad as the planning for the release of the Covid Virus…SINISTER! We do not need “WHO” running Pandemics!! Stop these lunatics before they kill everyone! In other words, “STOP WHO BEFORE WHO KIILLS YOU!” Get rid of “WHO”. Thank you. M.A,
there must be accountability for all officials involved with the injection fraud and crimes against humanity. humanity needs freedom of speech and bodily autonomy. we say NO to tyranny in all forms especially this abominable proposal for a power grab disguised as a proposed treaty
You must stop giving our medical freedoms and choices to an International governing organization that may not represent the best interests of Americans.
I do not want our futures to be controlled and governed by private businesses and corporations that aim to profit from the existence of human beings. I do not want governments to collude with those businesses in order for individuals within governments, or ‘groups’ of people, to benefit from the wider community in a way that is detrimental to that wider community. And these two points are highlighted by the fact of government and corporation secrecy about decisions that impact the wider community, which impedes on the wider community/population to make decisions on who they wish to support to govern them.
iAm Sign’n because of All that Died & 2Stop the Mass Genocide Against All of the WHOLEWiDEWORLD!
This is a travesty and criminal violation of inalienable human rights in total secrecy. Unelected self appointed bureaucrats can not dictate human medical rights and impose surveillance on citizens. Any resolutions will be corrupt and invalid, as this is an act of treason against the people you are mandated to serve. Something this i portant and global reaching must be put to a referendum by the people and the people must be included in the commissions and formulations of any changes. This can not usurp the national autonomy of countries and will not be accepted
There should be no centralised control of public health imposed on a sovereign state for which its people have not democratically voted for.
We need to stop these tyrants!
I am signing because we need to STOP the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. We should NEVER sign any treaty with the WHO because we are a sovereign nation!
I do not want the WHO treaty to be adopted at all. The treaty would harm natural human rights and human health and freedom.
To Stop the Adoption of Pandenic treaty.
I do not trust the WHO. They are funded by Bill Gates.
There shall not be any pandemic treaty. There is no need for such a thing. We don’t want a totalitarian society.
The handling of the pandemic was a farce. WHO is a corrupt institution as we have observed for more than two years now. This needs to stop.
The WHO have failed dismally to display their ability to manage any pandemic, past or into the future. The WHO are highly UNTRUSTWORTHY! I do not want my country to be controlled by the unelected bureaucrats at the WHO.
I am signing because I am against giving unelected officials power over me and the other citizens of Canada which only elected official should wield.
I do not believe that the WHO has the right to tell any nation how to handle a pandemic. I is one thing to set guidelines for necessary worldwide functions such as the distribution of medicine but to mandate vaccine passports. NEVER!!!! The United States is a sovereign nation, and each state has the right to attend to their citizens needs according to the will of these citizen.
By excluding participation from citizens of the world, the WHO displays non-transparency. It’s clear that this is just a power grab by the WHO, who are unelected and beyond prosecution.
Dear WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I believe this would create mandatory unnecessary meddling into the sovereign affairs of the member states. IHR protects nations right to create their own sovereign legislation for health policy, which includes preparedness assessments that varies country to country. It also creates a burden on member states and serves no legitimate purpose, contrary to public interest. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad decisions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willingness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, Civil Society Organizations (CSO’s), primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholders who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties. This body is presumably bloated and expensive whilst essentially redundant and unnecessary. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders that spoke at the first pandemic treaty hearing April 12,13, 2022, and the second hearing by video, such as Interest of Justice and others are included in a meaningful way. Thank you, Interest of Justice
I will not bow to one world governance
I really feel the WHO is not working for humanity but is attempting a global coup for power, control, depopulation and money. Why do they wish to remove countries’ medical sovereignty? It’s not in the best interests of the people of the world. Not at all.
We as a people do not comply to secret negotiations within W.H.O. We do not comply to secret treaties that are a political power grab. The W.HO has no political or health standing in individual countries.
I am signing because i don’t want to give away my Constitutional Rights as a US Citizen to be undermined by a foreign entity such as the WHO.
No treaty should be signed in secrecy
I am signing this petition because I am in complete agreement with the letter in this regard from Interest of Justice.
Stop the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty
Omdat dit misdaden tegen de menselijkheid zijn.
WHO is Snakes and totaly unelected!
This must stop
I want the UK to leave the WHO. It’s secrecy and overreaching intent have no place in a free world. It’s members are unelected. They demand powers beyond their abilities. I do not submit to any of their plans for massive restrictions on freedom of movement, bodily autonomy and the freedom to be human.
Simply, the WHO has no rights over our sovereign nations. We demand participation in the design of this Treaty. They shouldn’t even have the right to draw up such a treaty.
I’m so tired of all this bullshit!!
I control my body nobody else.!
I am in complete agreement with the letter in this regard from Interest of Justice.
I want to stop the adoption of the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty
I am signing because I am against any transfer of power from our sovereignty.
We human beings all have rights to make our own decisions, especially regarding our health.
The WHO are brazenly trying to control the world . I do NOT consent .
Every country should have the right to our local elected officials making decisions that affect our lives
I don’t support the WHO having this much power.
Weil ich der WHO nicht traue und selber bestimmen will, was in meinen körper kommt.
Because this is evil.
Unelected unaccountable officials should have no power over anyone, directly or indirectly.
The WHO has turned into a political entity with power they should not have. They do not have the health interests of the people but their own interests. And therefore I am against this “treaty.”
As a US citizen these organizations has no jurisdiction in my life.
No pandemic treaty
The WHO has clearly demonstrated that it has no interest in health but to share in control of world government so that more of humanity can be maimed and killed by forced injections.
I hate corruption. The WHO is very corrupt!
I want to stop genocides
I am opposed to this treaty, and any single, centralized controller of health and wellness.
I have the right to make decisions for me and my families health. No government has any right to control us.
W.H.O. Needs to be stopped. This organization is completely corrupt, and they should not have any power over our healthcare systems.
The WEF, WHO are globalists wanting to impose nedical, climate control…lies & fraud
I am a free man, therefore I do not consent and I will not comply and I will not enter into a contract with the WHO even if my government tries to sign me up on behalf of me…
WHO showed they’re not focusing on citizens well-being, and place technology above humanity. WHO is not elected and is financed by big coorporations.
The secrecy of what should be in the public arena indicates evil people are seeking to control us.
I want my country to be independent and respects the Constitution.
This treaty is repugnant to democratic process.
The WHO must not be allowed to consolidate power after they lied and covered up the origins of CCP VIRUS! They are globalists elites that steal the people’s money and use them as lab experiments for their transhumanist agenda.
All these gangster scoundrels and their greed-filled lunacy need to be taken out back and… stopped!
I have sovereignty over my health and my country should be sovereign too
i claim freedom and justice
Never can this be allowed to happen!
The WHO is an arm of entities not acting in the best interest of Humanity. They are not appointed by the people for the people. I will never support or recognize them as an authority in my life.
The WHO has to be cut off of all authoritative administration, health decisions. Citizens of the world are in charge of their health personally and need no direction nor mandate from the WHO.
I strongly oppose the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty the week of Dec. 5th, 2022. The treaty draft just released has excluded participation and that is unacceptable.
There should NEVER be a one size fits all on how to govern or respond to a crisis, especially a medical one!! Millions of people could have been saved worldwide if the medical community used hydroxychloroquine from the outset as was proven by many well-known doctors. The WHO knew this and decide to have people die for a lie and big pharma. So there should NEVER be a “pandemic treaty”!
I despise totalitarianism.
We mustn’t go down this path of insanity. We are a free people!
Sick of who un nwo no one has the right to tell our country how to be ran.
The WHO is a corporation, they are not elected and their decisions are irrelevant.
This is about controlling people’s bodily autonomy world wide. It is about denying people their God given right to decide what treatments to take, based on their knowledge of their unique physiology. This is about driving more profits to companies, governmental organizations, and international organizations, to the detriment of true human beings. We are being treated as slaves. This needs to stop NOW!
Crimes against humanity. The WHO can’t be trusted.
The WHO has no business attempting this fraudulent power grab from sovereign countries and their peoples.
a few people do not have the right to decide my medical treatment for me.
I am signing because we dont need anymore laws or mandates for vaccines.
No one should choose for any other human any medication or health choice.
The WHO and the corporate governments did not give us life so they have no right to take it away, or to undermine it in any way!!
The recent problems caused by the poor leadership of the WHO and many of it’s financial backers during the non pandemic should stand as documented proof that the organisation is not fit for purpose and should be abolished. The people responsible for these crimes should be imprisoned at the very least.
its wrong
Stop the W.H.O Pandemic Treaty!we need to be included in this draft!
Stop the Adoption of the Pandemic Treaty the week of December 5-10th.
The WHO is not in charge or in control of the world. This is a not democratic agreement. The WHO is discussing a treaty against human rights in a bid to control everyone’s movements and information. MUST BE STOPPED.
It’s just a control and power grab !
Bill Gates’s Who is setting up the citizens of the world with genocide in mind. Our bodies are not science experiments to be forced into deadly vaccinations and drugs. Our personal freedoms depend on this treaty being denied forever with full disclosure of the evil planned.
Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB.
Stop your adoption of the Pandemic Treaty!!
This treaty has nothing to do with public health. This is by design to control the people of the world in an effort to bring about the great reset.
I do not agree with vaccine mandates or passports.
I am signing because I do no believe in those “C” words, censorship, compliance!!
I am protesting adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.
I believe in justice. I believe in truth.
YOU are not Excluded in a treaty after knowingly committing crimes against humanity. You must pay the ultimate price!
I will not comply…period. Enough!
I am so so tired of the government and pharmaceutical overrreach
I am against giving power to the WHO in regards to our health. One Health for everyone is not workable. I don’t believe people should be forced to insert toxic vaccines and medicines into their body against their will. It violates basic human rights. I will never comply with their oppressive orders.
To help save our Republic!! liberty and Justice for all
These people are guilty of crimes against humanity!!!
I completely disagree with this treaty and believe it will eliminate the sovereignty of all nations involved.
Voor de VRIJHEID, Waarheid.
this isn’t about helping our health, but a power grab and money grab.
WHO shouldn’t be in charge of our health issues! They are a power hungry group who want us all dead!
We need to stop the elites and their global plan to strip us of our freedoms!
NO PANDEMIC TREATY!
I don’t like to be governed by people I didn’t elect
This is a disgusting totalitarian power grab.
I do not want our freedoms lost
I’ve lost faith in this organization and what their real narrative is
The WHO has no right to tell us what to do
WHO ha commited crimes against humanity and I demand that justice is served and severe sentences delivered to all involved and responsible no matter what position they hold or have held
the W.H.O. has repeatedly shown itself as incompetent, manipulative, conniving, and ignorantly tyrannical with no place in existence and this just in the last 3 years.
each state should control its people not the who
We did NOT elect you, you don’t represent us and therefore cannot make decisions for us. Shame on you for trying to do this.
Sovereign countries do not need the WHO.
Every sovereign nation must be able to independently determine its policies and actions for the health and wellbeing of its citizens and not be pressured, controlled or coerced by the WHO
I am signing because I am against everything the WHO is doing to restriction our rights and freedoms. Stop this treaty
I am signing because I believe that what the WHO top officials have and are doing is unethical and against our human rights.
I believe in the sovereign independence of a state to determine what’s best for its citizens and not the WHO
I am signing because of WHO deception. You have willingly done harm to Humanity, and for what?? You DO NOT get immunity from Humanity and you will be held accountable!!
justice is needed for the crimes committed
No so-called world authority should be able to dictate to citizens of any country, especially the USA!!
they have to be stopped
The WHO can go screw themselves, I didn’t vote for their murderous selves
The WHO is not needed in Canada or any other Sovereign country.
The WHO can go screw themselves, I didn’t vote for their murderous selves in ANY capacity
my body : my choice. kick out the tyrants
This Wrong
I am signing because the WHO cares nothing about people all they want to do is to line their pockets with dirty money.
I do not believe this is necessary. Vaccines ruin our immune systems
What they are proposing is criminal
This is a scheme to commit democide against humanity and must be stopped NOW.
I do not agree with your secret deals.
not agreeing to this & i have not elected any of these to represent me.. i will not have my souverenity taken of me..
It is the right thing to do to protect humanity
I am a citizen of this world and an American National. I do not give up any rights to Speak, Religion, Report(press), nor my right to Bare Arms, nor any right over my sovereign body nor the sovereign land that I am on.
stop the WHO pandemic treaty
STOP the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty
Fraud and Crimes Against Humanity
Freedom of Choice – if the Left gets it for Pregnancy; then we all should have it for any Vaccine!!
The WHO is sneaking, sulking , manipulating, behind closed doors because the evil it is doing would not be countenanced if done in the open. The WHO no longer does health, it does killing, stealing, lying, propaganda, and societal rape on every aspect of human life. It is Evil. And the evil doers need to be brought to justice.
The who needs to go
No one has the right to make decisions about our future without our input.
Tendros and other officials of The WHO, including Bill Gates who owns a controlling interest in The Who, must be tried for Crimes Against Humanity for intentional genocide and seeking to establish global tyranny for their own gain.
The adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty must be stopped! We need transparency and full participation.
I am signing because the W.H.O needs to be transparent.
I do not want the W.H.O. in charge of anything.
Justice must be served
This treaty is based on false information and is meant to give control over the individual and the nation to this one incompetent and dishonest group of people.
WHO’s poor track record, criminal membership, crimes against humanity, and abject ignorance of true health negate any and all claims they may posture over the planet and the people. Fraud vitiates all. Close the WHO down and replace with ethical people of good will and true service without criminal profiteering political incentives.
These criminals need to be brought to justice.If they get away with this the world would be lost
This treaty is dishonest and a disgusting display of power-hungry people trying to do what they will without regard to the individuals and countries they are trying to control.
Unelected officials have no business or authority to make health decisions for humanity. Health is a personal issue to be decided by each person with no outside interference.
This is illegal.
I’m opposeed to vaccine mandates and vaccine passports in general, and it is even more egregious when the alleged vaccines are my in large ineffective yet highly dangerous.
Im signing because crime against humanity 1 Enough is enough stop!
I believe in human freedom and self responsibility
I believe in bodily autonomy. WHO is a non elected organization who should not be dictating health policies of sovereign countries
I do NOT AGREE with all the secret meetings, amendments and attempts to remove global citizens GOD GIVEN SOVEREIGN RIGHTS by the WHO. They are a totally corrupt organization being funded by NGO’s who are clear eugenicists.
Seeking to formalize their criminal acts will not change the nature of their actions and the outcomes (death and INJURY to the compliant). No fines. Jail time and death sentences only. YMMV
The WHO see themselves as a global government. They are not elected by the people of any country. They need to be disbanded.
I like freedom!
No international organization should have the power to infringe on sovereign countries
I am against world slavery disguised as a health emergency
I have family members and friends who were all forced and put under duress to take this poisonous shots and which they are all having various side effects.
The “covid ruse” needs to be stopped and big pharma must be held to account for the lies and corruption they have purposely used to further their agenda.
The WHO has no business dictating how we as a country handle anything!!!
WHO is not an elected representative of my human birth rights! STOP them controlling humanity!!
I think no organisation anywhere shoul have so much power. It’s too dangerous.
Disband the WHO, Which is run by The WEF
Il devient de plus en plus connu comment cette institution est corrompue et mauvaise à tous les niveaux!
Awakening the lions
I oppose the WHO’s power grab. Shills for the WEF.
I am signing because those that have done such damage and death to all persons around the world. They need to be held accountable for their evil actions.
This is criminal
I am very concerned about what has transpired over the past few years and what is being covered up. I want to remain a human who has control over my body and the decisions I make and not be controlled by a global elite dictatorship.
This treaty needs to be stopped immediately, given that it calls itself a treaty but has only been emplaced under the radar using WEF-sponsored stooges in many sovereign nations. Since no public debate has been opened on the benefits and risks of yielding sovereignty, any such treaty is per se without merit. Equally, attempts to have national functionaries sign “on behalf of” implicates themselves in charges of acts hostile to the elected government.
I object to the need for any Pandemic Treaty. It is up to individual governments to decide how to proceed as each country has different cultures and criteria.
I am signing this petition because I refuse to have my rights as a Human being to Health and Happiness trampled on illegally. This is the Globalist dream for Global Governance and it is a total despicable $ham for these evil sold-out Eugenicist criminals. ‘
It’s time they all go down
I care a lot
I am a Sovern wo-man and we all need to stand against this huge corporation the W.H.O. for committing crimes against my own my God given rights to have FREEDOM over my own Body and my own Life
Apoyo la libertad para decidir sobre mi cuerpo.
this treaty will enslave humanity
I do not regard the WHO as an unbiased representative of science. Additionally, each country and district within a country has different conditions and different needs during a health crisis. They should not be made to give up their autonomy for a one size fits all approach that may or most likely may not be supported by science.
my government has not told me anything about this nor asked for community opinion
Because it is an invasion of my freedoms over myself and my own body. This is an evil power grab for control over Humanity and I find it disgusting.
Medical Tyranny must be stopped.
Medical Tyranny must be stopped at all costs!
no international treaties anymore
W.H.O. should not be allowed to end any nation, any countries sovereignty in any matter, and certainly not end individual and personal health care rights which are given to all human beings from Creator GOD
I have the god given right to put what I want in my body, and not be subject to genetic therapy and mrna injections
This treaty poses a direct threat to public health and imposes medical tyranny against the global population
I am signing because I am a human being who demands the right to decide my health options, travel plans, shopping trips, banking etc. which is really where this treaty is heading. Like the “vaccines” it has nothing to do with health.
I am signing because I do not agree with this proposal
NUESTRA ASOCIACIÓN APOYARÁ CUALQUIER ACCIÓN EN PRO DE LA VIDA, LA LIBERTAD Y LA JUSTICIA Y ESTÁ PETICIÓN LO ES
These folks are dirty. Have no such right. Unelected. Agenda not sanctioned by citizen body
stop tyranny.
I wholeheartedly support this petition.
diese Übergriffigkeit der WHO gestoppt werden muss. Jeder hat das Recht selbst über seinen Körper zu entscheiden. Diese Impfungen richten großen Schaden an .
I care!!
They have already been successful in bringing about the 2020 pandemic because we weren’t prepared but they CAN’T get away with it a second time!!
I believe the WHO, UN and WEF are criminal organisations, who want total control over all people.
I sign this petition because I believe in freedom of choice for this generation and future generations .
We need justice!
The WHO are totally corrupted pharmaceutical conflicts of interest. Therefore unfit to represent anything to the world.
I am signing because I want to see justice being done for the sake of humanity.
TURN OFF OPT-OUT UPDATES! STOP BEING PART OF THE PROBLEM!
the WHO is an independant company and acts outside the law.
I am signing because this is and was not about the worlds health but a power grab, greed and corruption
They KNOW they committed crimes
I want the Australian government to continue to make all decisions regarding our health at all times including during pandemics.
The powers that be are plotting against humanity intending its destruction, absolute control and death.
The WHO has not acted in just for the public in that there is lack of support for early treatment which we know helps. Transparency on the money flow during the pandemic I demand!
We are all free people.
the WHO is not our government
Each country should maintain their own sovereignty in regards to health care. The WHO was formed to make recommendations and not as a dictatorship.
The WHO should never be allowed to take over healthcare decisions for any sovereign country.
I believe the WHO sho be held accountable for crimes against humanity.
I want all this nonsense to come to an end now, and all parties responsible to be held accountable.
I don’t trust any institutions any longer. And especially who. You should go to jail. Laying bastards.
This must stop
I agree with the petition
The WHO is an unelected body. The people of the United Kingdom require that democracy is adhered to. The UK is a sovereign nation.
I believe in National Sovereignty and Undeniable Human Rights. The W H O is pretending the Nuremberg Code never happened.
we have never consented to criminal globalist organizations taking over our lives.
I stand against satanism and satanists
The WHO is an unelected non governmental organization that has NO BUSINESS in interfering with sovereign nations and their sovereign people!
Genocide
we need LOCAL not global governance!
I do not accept any contracts, amendments or treaties with the WHO. The WHO has demonstrated to be incompetent as a health organization.
The United States of American is never to sign a Pandemic Treaty with the W.H.O. or any other country.
Like many thousands of others, I have lost friends, been kept apart from my family lost income and basically had my freedom curtailed for the last few years. These tyrannical dictators need to pay for their crimes.
The W.H.O. seem to have given themselves authority over the public. We did not vote them in, this is not democratic. Conducting secret treaty’s without public inclusion is not democratic. We demand transparency and inclusion on these crucial decisions.
No adoption of the W.H.O. pandemic treaty. NO.
What i do with my body was given to me by GOD not the WHO. They should not be allowed to go free for hurting so many and those who dies because of this lie.
This treaty has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control.
I DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE WHO. I DO BELIEVE WHO IS CORRUPT. AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.
I am signing because the WHO is NOT a sovereign entity like a country…America is a sovereign country that lives by its own rules.
This should be handled by each individual country. Not as a treaty by one organization controlled by whom?
Justice
No one has the right to force a medical treatment on another, NO ONE! #sicsempertyrannis
The WHO should not be able to take our Constitutional rights away!
My husband has suffered brain injury from the injections, and my children and grandchildren are at risk of the long term consequences of brain, lung, heart, and fertility damages as the spike protein toxin factories, their bodies have become, do not shut down. The ongoing damages are pending.
Corrupt govt
Humanity requires freedom
No we will not forget or forgive. Nuremberg Code WILL Be enforced! We Just Filed W.H.O. Charges For Crimes Against Humanity.
From terrorists to pandemics, non-representative organizations like WHO that are politically influenced can not have authority over sovereign elected governments.
We do not want the Pandemic Treaty! NO! Listen to the people not the corrupt WHO!
We need to run our own country.they need to be kept out of our business.they shouldn’t be able to tell us to do anything.
No pandemic treaty concocted by the murderous criminals at W.H.O.
I do not support these vaccines because they are killing innocent people.
This proposed treaty equivocate the end of human dignity and it must be stopped.
The WHO Has no business telling the USA what to do….Kick them out of everything ..We the people cna decide what is best
These people are trying to kill mankind, they have to be stopped
I an signing because of the nefarious action that they took against humanity.
I an signing because of the nefarious action that they took against humanity.
Stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic treaty for Dec 5,2022 Treaty Draft just released the WHO has excluded participation
This is a complete outrage! What has happened to our democracy and our republic. These people are not elected officials and must not have this kind of control over our autonomy, period!
They are trying to nullify the rights to self determination of the free people of the world. We must not comply with the Globalists. It’s a ridiculous definition of “pandemic” and they can declare it even if no one in the world has died. They can declare it over hangnails for goodness sake! It’s an excuse to take away our rights by declaring states of emergency.
This is not a treaty- it is NOT about our health. This is a power grab designed to make money and clearly cares nothing about the peoples health and well-being…quite the contrary.
The vaccination is killing more people than saving. The tyrants who planned this mass genocide, Along with every single person involved in promoting it, must be brought to trial.
They have killed my sister and hundreds of thousands more. It has to stop.
I am signing the petition because WHO members need to be held accountable for the deaths and injuries from the so called Covid Vaccines!
I am signing because it is vital to stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.
An unelected body of persons, do not have the right to stop the people from looking at what will impact on them. If it is secret, they are not forming anything that will be part of what the people of the world agree with. So they hide, like cowards.
This treaty must be stoppe because it gives too much power to untrustworthy and unelected elites who have no concern for the health and well being of people.
The WHO shall not overrule the US Constitution and Congress.
The WHO has no right whatsoever to interfere with any nation’s sovereignty or to demand that nations cede their (medical interventions) powers to them. The WHO should be dismantled entirely. They are up to no good at all.
They have to be exposed
Because WHO’s actions are not in favor of people’s health, they are harmful. This should be known to the world.
this treaty would mean worldwide terror
Waarheid en vrijheid
I believe in Heath freedom and autonomy. I believe in the sovereignty of states and nations.
Everyone involved in the mass genocide needs to be tried for their crimes, then hung
I love freedom.
I am signing because the WHO failed miserably in its response to Covid. Because of that failure the institution has neither credibility nor standing to insist on giving itself more power and authority to respond to worldwide health crises in the future.
The unelected few cannot rule over the mass.
no foreign entity needs to know about my health and to dictate my healthcare to me
I am signing because centralization is dangerous. If we are all in the same boat and that boat springs a leak we all go down.
Enough of the WHO stepping out of bounds. They do NOT have the right
THIS IS NOT A TREATY. THIS IS NOT ABOUT OUR HEALTH. THIS IS A CORRUPT POWER GRAB TO CONTROL OUR LIVES THE EFFECT IS TO FUNNEL BILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO THE PHARMACEUTICAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.
Excluding participation of public organizations makes the WHO Pandemic Treaty void. People’s voices must be heard, particularly as you are unelected.
We should never give our sovereignty away.
The Pandemic treaty is a”license” to install a totalitarian control over our most private and precious parts of our life
Who is stealing my medical freedom
no foreign entity needs to know about my health and to dictate my healthcare to me
We need to be free of the WHO and their agenda
I am signing because there was no real pandemic. There was only pharma marketing and fear porn. The absolute effectiveness of COVID vaccines is .85% so totally unnecessary. 5 vaccines and people are still getting COVID so this is these vaccines are not effective at all. Negative efficacy. Do not continue these policies!
I’m signing this petition because the WHO has NO RIGHT to DICTATE THE WORLD & TAKE OUR RIGHTS AWAY!!!
Everything I have heard about this treaty points to it being the worst move I have ever heard of, in terms of its applying one-size-fits-all governance at a global level, denying the sovereignty of every nation signing on to it–a hideous abuse of every citizen in every country, and something doomed to go badly for all of us. No nation should ever give up its sovereignty the way this document as drafted proposes we should! It is wrong, and an evil overriding of all our rights.
I didn’t vote for The Who and I have NO intention of EVER following anything they supposedly try to force on me a FREE citizen of the United States of America
The USA has a constitution and it should never be abridged by an unelected outside organization.
It’s clear that these so called experts are nothing more than a cartel of fascists who no more care about the human race than Hitler cared about the Jews, blacks, the impaired.
I want to restore our freedoms.
This treaty is against national Sovereignty and the freedom of individual choices. It is also against the personal religious freedoms.
During the covid outbreak, WHO proved itself beholden to funder interests, which it placed above scientific integrity and the health of the peoples of the world. I have lost all faith in it as an institution. The proposal to further rush emergency use products is abhorrent, given the harms the rushed gene therapies have caused to many – the extent of which is yet to be fully elucidated. Lastly, such global centralisation is not acceptable as it will violate national sovereignty. Decisions on health should be made as locally as possible because health is very individual – one-size-fits-all is NOT good medical practice. This is regressive! Without nuance, what we have is tyranny, which I wholeheartedly reject!
Because, We the People, of the United States don’t belong with the WHO or the WEF’ers. We want nothing to do with YOU the WHO. Leave use alone and stay out of our Country. We live by our US CONSTITUTION.
They are just reallocating corruption.
The WHO has no authority to control citizens of the USA per our Constitution. The citizens will never be controlled by any foreign entity, even if our government leaders wish to sign on to any foreign treaty . WE THE PEOPLE decide what we want to do.
I do not trust the WHO.
The WHO organization does not have our country’s citizens best interest at hand when it come to pandemic, etc.
I absolutely stand for medical freedom.
I am in agreement. Unfair and only meant to control the population.
My father choose to gi to the 2nd world war so my siblings & I could live in a free country & have chosen not be controlled by foreign countries.
This is a deceptive maneuver and inhumane power grab of people. It is masquerading as health promoting when it is blatantly in opposition to health and well being. NO to this so called “treaty”.
I value soverignty and DO NOT accept the overreach of WHO
As a daughter in Christ this is out right blasphemy against GOD! As an American we first have Gods given rights followed by our Constitutional Republic Rule of Law followed by a Declaration of Independence. WE THE PEOPLE DO NOT SUPPORT THIS TREASON AGAISNT US!! WE DO NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT! This country belongs to GOD and We the People not government who works for US! WE DO NOT WORK FOR YOU! You DO NOT have the authority to strip us of our rights!! You ALL are a disgrace to GOD and America!! Shame on all of you! You need to repent, ask God and We the People for forgiveness and STOP this TREASON NOW! Government has NO business in anyone’s health PERIOD! NOT YOUR JOB or Some international group, who has NO AUTHORITY in AMERICA! Americans do answer to international entity! We are a country with Laws that We the People control, NOT YOU! This is not only TREASON ITS PURE EVIL! Gods’ children WILL NOT SERVE a fallen angel and enemy of GOD. GOD is the Creator of Man, Heaven, Hell and Earth! ALPHA, OMEGA, LORD of LORDS, KINGS of KINGS, the Beginning and the END! Our Bodies and DNA belong to GOD, NOT Man or beast! WE DENY the fallen angel. Every man and woman will give an account to our father in the end. Read Revelation, the outcome is written and will surlily come. Praying that your heart will turn back to GOD.
They did everything wrong during the Covid 19 thing, they will do everything wrong in a next “Pandemic” incompetent dangerous people in the Who, they are not for We The People but to get power and fill their pockets.
I no longer trust the W.H.O. It has been corrupted by people with evil intentions for the people of the world! God help us to either purify the W.H.O. by arresting the corrupt Controllers and or to replace it with the World Health Council!
I am defending my freedom and my rights.
I will not comply.
Genociding humanity is not the way forward.
I am DONE with these moronic tyrants!
I am 100% against this proposition that will usurp our freedom and rights. As representatives of the citizens of this country, it is your responsibility to act in a manner that reflects the wants and needs of the populous, and not necessarily your own personal view. The legality of such a treaty is questionable but it most certainly is a direct conflict with constitutionality. The WHO, which is funded primarily by the CCP will have absolute control over all manner of systems in this country and the take over will be complete. It is your duty to act in a manner to defend the constitution of this nation above all else.
This is not a treaty. It is a corrupt power grab. It should be stopped dead.
I unequivocally say NO to ANY WHO involvement in my or any humans life on this planet! NO NO NO NO NO NO NO
I am signing because the WHO treaty must not strip our national sovereignty. This must not be allowed to happen.
government of the people, by the people, for the people. Not by the federal bureaucrats or these worldly tyrants
it is the right thing to do.
I support medical freedom
I am signing this because health freedom is a necessity on this planet for all people!
I am opposed to the WHO getting any more control or power over any medical issues or pandemics worldwide. They have failed miserably during COVID on hundreds of levels but the most obvious is that they couldn’t even investigate the origins of the virus with any level of truth or integrity! Therefore, why the hell would the world give it any more power or money?
my rights were given to me by God. not any God but my God. and no man or who can take them away from me.
I am signing because USA should defund and withdraw from the WHO.. corruption and CCP directed…. Must be stopped.
Because American sovereignty is in jeopardy. The WHO has no authority to rule over the member states. We must defund the WEF and the UN and all of its affiliate agencies. It is time to shut them down.
World unity to stop the Bureaucracy associated with forced vaccinations, loss of employment, vaccine injuries, freedom of choice, freedom of rights, protect our children. The WHO agenda must end to protect everyday lives and businesses.
I don’t believe in giving up our sovereignty.
This is NOT a treaty at all It is a document of tyranny and absolute power leading to slavery. God made us free people, we will not comply. We say NO!
Er zijn geen objectieve evaluaties gebeurd over de Corona Lockdowns en de mondmaskers en de behandelingen. We weten NOG STEEDS NIET met zekerheid waar het Coronavirus vandaan kwam. Er zijn GEEN evaluaties over het waarom er zoveel chronische zieke mensen zijn en kinderen. Over het waarom de kankers blijven stijgen. De World Health Organisation wants to implement another not so clever system on the already immense heap of problems. The treaty is a stacking up of rotting layers on top of rotting layers. We need a new fresh intelligent body which starts from zero to evaluate the health of humankind as it is now to stop further damage of the wonderfulness that is called life.
I am extremely uncomfortable with the power and control this treaty designates to the WHO. The United States of America is capable of caring for our own needs without the dictates proposed by the WHO.
The WHO knows nothing about medicine, health or pandemics. The evidence from the last 2-3 years clearly defines the corruption/ criminal activity the WHO was actively involved in. It is like a 5 year old declaring that they know what is best for the world and are put in charge. No responsibility, humanity or integrity. The WHO needs to be completely dismantled.
I value freedom.
The sovereignty of my nation shall not be infringed
Because it needs to be stopped. I will not comply, I haven’t yet and I will not start now. These lies have to come out. The truth has to prevail. These people need to be stopped. They need to be held accountable for their actions against humanity.
The W.H.O. is a corrupt and dangerous organization!!!
The WHO is an unelected body and therefore in my opinion has no right to impose any rules over me as an individual.
No right to informed consent or Doctor patient privilege
Clearly, I do not want the USA’s interests to be controlled by the WHO or any other entity outside the USA. Our freedoms are given by God and the US Constitution protects those freedoms as long as strong Christian leaders stand firm in their responsibilities to protect and preserve the USA and ‘We the People’! ACT NOW – God Bless the USA!!
I do not agree with rushing legally binding “one health” solutions to future pandemics. If a disease is declared a pandemic it will be because we don’t know how to treat it. In that case doctors all over the world should treat patients as best they can and share any useful learning from their experiences. In the covid pandemic this exchange has been suppressed. Scientists should share their knowledge and find a common consensus. This too has been suppressed in the covid pandemic. The censorship and shaming of doctors and scientists who had different opinions to the dominant narrative has been appalling. It is deeply disturbing to know that many people died unnecessarily due to this situation. There has been no acknowledgement of mistakes made. There is no intention to improve next time, just a rush in secrecy to ensnare all countries into future legislation and to make sure that the pandemic industry will continue to do excellent business in future. I don’t think we can entrust the WHO with international treaties.
This group has no legal or God given authority to oppress the citizens of the world.
Stop the obvious power grab now
Who is a corrupt criminal organization masquerading as a health body.
I do not consent. I do not want the traitors to keep the fraud going on forever!
This absolutely nothings at all to do with health, Rater ather direct attack open the God given fredom of mankind to control their own lives.
I object to anyone deciding to any degree on my bodily autonomy, hence, all you are doing is for naught. I object to your so-called authority on medical matters and powers you give yourselves.
This is a bioweapon program to destroy humanity. I am human and I have divine right to be free
Humans have the right of freedom. The WHO is not an organization that promotes freedom. They do not have my support!
The World Health Organization’s proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is a sneak attack on our personal freedoms and national sovereignty that is hiding in plain sight.
We need out of the UN and we need the UN out of the US!
The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential. This means that the person involved should have legal capacity to give consent; should be so situated as to be able to exercise free power of choice, without the intervention of any element of force, fraud, deceit, duress, over-reaching, or other ulterior form of constraint or coercion.
This is an Unconstitutional Treaty and it needs to be rejected by true Americans.
National sovereignty.
This is the biggest threat to freedom & human rights in the history of the human race.
I am against this treaty that they are proposing
I believe it’s up to each person to choose after having informed consent of the risk or reward of any intervention!
This treaty is totaly illegal ad unconstitutional. You have no busisness unilaterally making these decisions.
Medical freedom and bodily autonomy are key to individual liberty. There is no such thing as a one size fits all treatment for anything. Individual freedom must be respected and accepted!
I can about sovereignty and freedom
This has nothing to do with protecting health
It has become obvious to me as to many others that real and effective treatments for the corona virus were pushed aside in favor of a dangerous experimental so called “vaccine” and an effort to increase centralized control of the population through authoritarian means.
I do not agree with this treaty and I do not give my consent as a sovereign citizen of the USA to give ANYONE rights to make this decision upon my behalf.
I hate it-/ we can govern ourselves fine-/ we have for many many years now— we are the Land of the Free!! Don’t become a traitor
I like my sovereignty. My house is a sanctuary building, not a part of the US.
No WHO treaty
I stand against the passage of this treaty.
A global/foreign organization has no authority over the sovereign residents of any country without explicit written consent of the individual.
Sarcusa principles stand. lift the immunity bill gates holds, abolish the world health organisation and tedros must be arrested for his outstanding crimes.
A “One Size Fits All” WHO health care system will be a CATASTROPHE! WE THE PEOPLE demand Transparency to see the US Amendments!!! THE WHO MUST STEP DOWN & STOP THE PANDEMIC TREATY!!!
I’m against Who ruling our world.
The World Health Organization’s proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is a sneak attack on our personal freedoms and national sovereignty that is hiding in plain sight. These meetings are a direct assault upon the national sovereignty of EVERY NATION ON EARTH! The current “Conceptual Zero Draft” of the proposed “Pandemic Treaty” is a blatant POWER AND MONEY GRAB.
The WHO and their master bill gates are in the business of world depopulation. Their International concern of one human being let alone the world is a farce and they are criminals of mass destruction. Send them to world prison.
I am signing, because the WHO treaty is a coup in disguised to remove the suzerainty of every country in the world
Stop the adoption of the W.H.O. Pandemic treaty.
The W.H.O. has done enough damage to our lives. They are no longer relevant.
This is totalitarian control that are aimed at taking away our private rights as sovereign beings. We must stop this now before we are all becoming slave states. I want my children and all future generations live in a free world where everyone has the right to decide over their own bodies and property.
In the name of Jesus Christ I demand you come to a FULL STOP. You are not in charge. Our Lord and Savior is and we are his Army of Children! Get Back satan!
It is an infringement on our sovereign rights.
It is an infringement on our sovereign rights.
I disagree with the direction of the WHO. I Request that the UNITED STATES EXIST THE WHO
Against the way WHO wants to rule the world
I do not want any international agency, especially WHO telling/ forcing Americans or for that matter any other foreign nation to conform against their will to receive any/ all vaccinations.
An international body has the right to take away our personal freedom & ignore individual countries constitutions. These treaty are illegal.
The WHO has zero integrity. WHO would make a person accused of genocide against his own people and make him the head of a UN group? Only a corrupt and Lying totalitarian group of elitists. The WHO belongs in the garbage, period.
I’m totally against this it’s very very very un-American
I am signing because this treaty will destroy each country’s sovereignty. This is a power grab