Petition to

Protest The W.H.O. Draft Pandemic Treaty!

Protest The W.H.O. Draft Pandemic Treaty!
6,1K view
November 27, 2022

1,478 Supporters

Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
See more...
Letter to

Dear WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB),

Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB.

1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the "WHO CA+" supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus.

3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: "tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also "strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions."

4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The "WHO CA+" repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11)
Pandemic - 112 times
Recovery - 52 times
Response - 106 times
Public Health - 44 times
Preparedness - 74 times
Equity - 32 times
Prevention - 68 times
Pandemic Response Products - 27 times
IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The "WHO CA+" never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines.  Why not?  Shouldn't they have a role in public health instruments?

5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the "WHO CA+" advocates for a "global peer review mechanism" to assess each nation's preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the "Governing Body" of the "WHO CA+" will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance.  I believe this would create mandatory unnecessary meddling into the sovereign affairs of the member states.  IHR protects nations right to create their own sovereign legislation for health policy, which includes preparedness assessments that varies country to country.  It also creates a burden on member states and serves no legitimate purpose, contrary to public interest.

6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the "WHO CA+" is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide "pandemic response products.' Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad decisions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO.

7. I protest the lack of willingness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, Civil Society Organizations (CSO's), primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -"Enhance WHO's central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;"

8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of "a national One Health Action Plan" which, in the human and animal sectors: "optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world "no one is safe until a needle in every arm", and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholders who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders.

9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the "WHO CA+" that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a "Governing Body" ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties.  This body is presumably bloated and expensive whilst essentially redundant and unnecessary.

10. I protest Page 13 - "Central role of WHO - As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.' This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO's oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO's presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems!

11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders that spoke at the first pandemic treaty hearing April 12,13, 2022, and the second hearing by video, such as Interest of Justice and others are included in a meaningful way.

Thank you,

Updates

More updates...
Interest of Justice
Interest of Justice
Started this petition 2 months ago

1,158 comments on “Protest The W.H.O. Draft Pandemic Treaty!”

  • Jim Procyk
    Jim Procyk

    Obvious.

  • Krista O'Dea
    Krista O'Dea

    Absolutely NOT. I will not allow threats to be masked as safety measures. My BODY, MY CHOICE.

  • Robert Hanson
    Robert Hanson

    Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,

  • Björn Elisson
    Björn Elisson

    My body my choice..

  • Catherine M Duis
    Catherine M Duis

    this is bullshit

  • Mark Watkins
    Mark Watkins

    This is an evil that must be stopped!!!

  • Martin Wilson
    Martin Wilson

    Freedom & Justice

  • Stephen Medina
    Stephen Medina

    These are criminals and deserve to be put to death for their crimes against humanity

  • Lorraine Backer
    Lorraine Backer

    I disagree with the World Health Organization having control over my rights and freedoms to choose.

  • David Johnson
    David Johnson

    I value my right to make my own health choices, and object to any government actions resulting in transfering my rights to an unelected body I have no say in, such as the WHO.

  • Bob McKenzie
    Bob McKenzie

    This is a veiled attempt to control the movement & freedom of humanity. Free speech and dissent of opinions against the narrative are at stake.

  • sandra moran
    sandra moran

    This WHO CA+ needs to be placed in the trash along with the SCUM that is proposing it! I say NO to this!

  • Steven Chatham
    Steven Chatham

    I am signing to stand against this agreement. This is against my freedoms as an American Citizen and a child of God.

  • Patrick Allan
    Patrick Allan

    I believe the W.H.O. serves the interest of the cooperate few that fund the W.H.O. and not the people of the world. The organization has been wrong over the course of this sham we all have been living thru. A corrupt organization can not be trusted with power over the people.

  • John Hughes
    John Hughes

    I don’t trust the WHO.

  • ERIC BLACK
    ERIC BLACK

    we don;t want this we don;t need this We all know it is about control and your bloody mandates

  • Melody Chard-Schonski
    Melody Chard-Schonski

    Stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. I did not give my rights away to the world health organization, and did not vote for WHO. I won’t be complying with vaccine passports, nor will I be taking any vaccines.

  • Rodessa Keasey
    Rodessa Keasey

    I don’t support the WHO telling the US what to do

  • Matt M
    Matt M

    I want to

  • Ellen Shaar
    Ellen Shaar

    COVID IS TREATABLE WITH NATURAL METHODS AND THE STATISTICS HAVE SHOWN THAT SURVIVAL RATES ARE ABOUT THE SAME AS SURVIVAL RATES FOR THE FLU. AND, governmental agencies and their employees (who receive monies) for pushing these policies, have no rights to tell me how to manage my personal health.

  • steven lay
    steven lay

    I am signing because the more important the decision the more choice the individual should have.

  • Jeannette Barras
    Jeannette Barras

    I believe the WHO should have no right to track us or force vaccines on us

  • Amy Van Buskirk
    Amy Van Buskirk

    The WHO has no right to monitor and control my health choice

  • theya kan
    theya kan

    STOP

  • David House
    David House

    Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,

  • Robin Keel
    Robin Keel

    I care about our freedom!!

  • Janet Rhead
    Janet Rhead

    We should be consulted on issues affecting us.

  • Floyd Hayes
    Floyd Hayes

    The Corrupt W.H.O. has no authority over the citizens of the United States, NOW OR EVER!!!!!!

  • Sharon Lamont
    Sharon Lamont

    I want this stopped

  • Frank Marianni
    Frank Marianni

    I am signing because I oppose the loss of sovereignty of nations, and do not believe the empty assurances that such a thing will not happen.

  • Sharon Delaney
    Sharon Delaney

    The virus was never isolated. The PCR tests were fraudulent and used to shut down businesses and schools . This injustice must never happen again.

  • Brown Kevin
    Brown Kevin

    No need treaty. There is no pandemic. There was no pandemic. No need treaty. Need justice.

  • Ina Gabler
    Ina Gabler

    The WHO pandemic treaty is not valid because it has excluded outside participation. The world already rejected such a treaty earlier in 2022. This secretive attempt to control the world population is a crime of gigantic proportions, designed to give The WHO tyrannical powers, stripping nations of their sovereignty.

  • Edward Bachelder
    Edward Bachelder

    The WHO is unelected body acting as a global despot.

  • Marien Breen
    Marien Breen

    I want to stop the W.H.O pandemic Treaty of the week of December 5, 2022.

  • Curt Odell
    Curt Odell

    The WHO pandemic response was horrific, and I have no trust in a corrupt International organization who is not accountable to the US people. These illegal amendments should not be accepted by any reasonable country.

  • John Shaw
    John Shaw

    Canada is sovergin onto itself. It has its own incompetent medical administration that will answer to Canadians. We do not need an unaccountable body directing global health concerns when they have shown great stupidity

  • Vale Kiev
    Vale Kiev

    Public trust in the World Health Organization has been destroyed due to incompetent mishandling of the C-19 pandemic, the greed, corruption and conflicts of interest that plague the organization, and the CCP’s excessive influence in all WHO decision making. The pandemic has finally exposed the true motivations of this unelected, undemocratic body. The WHO CA+ has absolutely no relevance to the health and well-being of humanity. It is about totalitarian control and an enormous transfer of wealth. Since it has been drafted in secrecy to the exclusion of global stakeholders, it is null and void. Humanity will respond to globalist tyranny with resounding non-compliance.

  • marilyn daniels
    marilyn daniels

    No pandemic treaty

  • Carlos Costa
    Carlos Costa

    Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,

  • Roberrt Banner
    Roberrt Banner

    I care about my children!

  • A Soppelsa
    A Soppelsa

    We do not need WHO parents – we are all grown up and doing fine thank you

  • Ann Waller
    Ann Waller

    We need to STOP this WHO Pandemic Treaty. I do not agree with anything the WHO proposes.

  • Lisa Wright
    Lisa Wright

    I do NOT support the WHO initiatives and documents. The USA is a sovereign nation and should NOT support the WHO.

  • Margret Freund
    Margret Freund

    It is wrong

  • Mary Renaghan
    Mary Renaghan

    You idiots have no place in my life nor do you have the proper knowledge of my physical needs to determine what is right for other countries and other individuals.

  • Wanda Whitney
    Wanda Whitney

    We need to stop the Pandemic Treaty draft that is to be released. No information has been released and we need to have a say in it. It affects us all

  • Scott Farnsworth
    Scott Farnsworth

    The WHO is a terrorist organization, period. They’re all guilty of crimes against humanity, as are the politicians who enforce their baseless “health policies”. The Nuremberg Code was established for a reason. These criminals have now been exposed, and the consequences they face will be severe.

  • Beverly Foster
    Beverly Foster

    This is illegal, unconstitutional and it’s NOT going to happen!

  • Melanie Dewar
    Melanie Dewar

    DOWN WITH SCHWAB AND WEF, Harari and OBAMA and WHO

  • Jacqueline Poll-Lewis
    Jacqueline Poll-Lewis

    The WHO is not elected by one individual around this globe we call Earth and it is past time for them to be interfering in any country, and need to be defunded and DISBANDED.

  • David Shellock
    David Shellock

    Stop medical tyranny

  • Claire DossAntos
    Claire DossAntos

    No treaty for pandemics should involve forced vaccines or lockdowns.

  • Ann Robinson
    Ann Robinson

    I am signing because I want to STOP the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty. We have not been included in the making of this.

  • Christopher Ferland
    Christopher Ferland

    The last, going on three years, has been a blatant display of zero regard for human rights by people we put in power with our money. This has to stop and I’m willing to die to make that so.

  • Judith Martinez
    Judith Martinez

    Stop the drafting of the Pandemic Treaty

  • Sovereign Being
    Sovereign Being

    we will not be injected with your poisons. humanity is onto you. you will be destroyed. Karmic law is inescapable.

  • Carolyn Stoppard
    Carolyn Stoppard

    I cannot risk another adverse reaction, especially on a “vaccine” that doesn’t stop infection or transmission.

  • Sona Seaton
    Sona Seaton

    This is a huge money/ power grab by elites that are owned by big Pharma

  • Melanie Ross
    Melanie Ross

    Dear WHO INB, I demand the conceptual draft of the treaty is not adopted in the next meeting the week of December 5, 2022. The INB has recognized relevant stakeholders in pandemic preparedness and response, however, these primary relevant stakeholders that represent many sectors of the public are being excluded from Annex E and from meaningful participation. Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I suggest the WHO create a process and automatic mechanism online for the public to present, and for WHO to accept, outside peer review documents. Rather than set up a global peer review mechanism that only accepts WHO approved experts work, there must be a mechanism for WHO to be able to peer review a peer review document by any group of experts of good repute who signed they have no conflicts. For instance, there is a peer reviewed document on NIH website that shows the PCR test is invalid for being wholly unscientific as used at 45ct in the Charite protocol (first WHO covid-19 diagnostics recommendations from January 2020) which has never been properly refuted by the WHO, NIH or anyone on earth. WILL THE WHO PEER REVIEW THE PEER REVIEWED CORMAN DROSDEN REPORT? see peer reviewed report that says WHO has faulty science to diagnose covid and false statistics: https://cormandrostenreview.com/ I demand an online mechanism in WHO to review contentious scientific peer reviewed documents immediately once any “evolving science” is known to be contentious and I demand the INB create a procedure in the treaty for a hearing immediately if the WHO’s peer reviewed conclusion conflicts with outside experts peer reviewed conclusions. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad desicions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willilngness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, CSO’s, primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholdres who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties much like that which promotes “climate change.’ The climate change oversight body is unnecessary and based on fraudulent climate emergency science. Show us the science to prove the climate change agendas are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,

  • Melinda Winkler
    Melinda Winkler

    are strictly required by the exigency. Burden of proof is on INB if they propose these articles. It is worth mentioning the UN-WHO has refused to prove the climate science when asked and they refuse to consider outside peer reviewed science which disproves a climate emergency exists. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders are included in a meaningful way. Thank you,

  • Liane Sanderson
    Liane Sanderson

    The pandemic response vaccination rollout as admitted by Pfizer themselves failed to stop transmission, failed to stop people succumbing to the ‘virus’ and was NOT Safe and Effective….why in Gods name would the WHO continue to promote a ‘pandemic response’ that has glaringly failed humanity; one that has caused countless deaths and injuries through a vaccine that has still not been inconclusively proven safe ….indeed that has no complete trial data to prove safety or efficacy. The WHO needs to step down while true scientific research is completed and then their ‘pandemic response’ plan needs to be thoroughly investigated and actions bought to public accountability .

  • Theresa Noullet
    Theresa Noullet

    Because this is so clandestine and only including those who support it. Again, America is a sovereign country and we want to remain so without foreign powers shoving regulations on us that we have NOT voted for.

  • George Bodley
    George Bodley

    I’m opposed to all vaccine mandates and so called vaccine passports. These injections are ineffective and extremely dangerous.

  • Vicki Streifel
    Vicki Streifel

    I am againsed the Pandemic Treaty

  • paola amaldi
    paola amaldi

    We do not need any further legally binding documents empowering the W H O to grab power and rule our daily life . Leave us alone and give us back our knowledge about nature and natural remedies

  • Robert Dotson, MD
    Robert Dotson, MD

    STOP the totalitarian intrusion of the WHO into our health issues!

  • Patricia Smith
    Patricia Smith

    There is no need for a pandemic treaty.

  • Geraldine May
    Geraldine May

    Unelected officials have no business making laws, including binding treaties.

  • Connie Wells
    Connie Wells

    Time for the WHO to stop hiding their genocidal policies

  • David Goulden
    David Goulden

    I am signing because the WHO has no right to adopt the WHO Pandemic Treaty the week of December 5,2022 which would be harmful to the whole world population.

  • D Fleming
    D Fleming

    I completely disagree with giving the WHO such arbitrary powers over sovereign countries and humanity. This must not be allowed! WHO can no be trusted.

  • Julie Gillespie
    Julie Gillespie

    I do not want the WHO in charge of the United States health care or MY health care!

  • Owen Quinn
    Owen Quinn

    I am signing because the WHO Pandemic Treaty is a fraud and a farce and will end the power of sovereign nations to govern themselves. It is nothing but a naked power grab by the psychotic, power-hungry global elites

  • Gina Verdi
    Gina Verdi

    I am opposed to any Pandemic treaty and believe in sovereignty and independence. People are not cookie cutter one size fits all and these agencies are NOT following the true science! These vaccines are ineffective and dangerous with documented side effects! Many people have “died suddenly”!

  • Cassandra Auerbach
    Cassandra Auerbach

    Tyranny is not acceptable.

  • Billy Markert
    Billy Markert

    they have done wrong

  • Agnes Marko
    Agnes Marko

    To prevent foreign intervention in my country!

  • Traci Bell
    Traci Bell

    These actions only benefit the pharmaceutical companies and not individuals. Natural immunity, early treatment, vitamins, supplements, homeopathic medicines, etc are all not mentioned.

  • Frank O'Blenis
    Frank O'Blenis

    No outside organization has a right to decide health care policy in this country

  • Jay Paterson
    Jay Paterson

    This organisation is demonstrably corrupt and these amendments clearly breachbthe autonomy of the individual and their human rights.

  • MS lumina
    MS lumina

    What you are doing is unmitigatedly evil.

  • Kathleen Hilliard
    Kathleen Hilliard

    I choose my healthcare plan, not WHO. If their plan is so good I would choose it BUT they have NO AUTHORITY to choose for me. The people of the world never elected these people/groups to make us rules for us. We will choose the people/plans for our health ourselves.

  • Ronél Smit
    Ronél Smit

    This is not a treaty, it is a manipulatively and falsely premised and secret document, enforcing the secret agenda of psychopathic individuals who have relinquished their sanity for the sake of power based on insatiable greed and boundless evil.

  • Larry Gaucher
    Larry Gaucher

    I am signing because I do not want the WHO to have any involvement in any Pandemic. They showed how useless they were in the with covid. All their recommendations were harmful and they prevented useful remedies from being used.

  • joseph serpico
    joseph serpico

    This is not equitable.

  • Candy Peavy
    Candy Peavy

    The WHO Pandemic Treaty must be stopped!

  • Juliette Wood
    Juliette Wood

    The USA should not hand over our sovereignty to incompetent idiots or anyone else.

  • Leon-Forrest Caulkins
    Leon-Forrest Caulkins

    We’re going to stop government criminality?

  • Aukland Daley
    Aukland Daley

    This is being done in secret and without citizens voting for this

  • Susan Miles
    Susan Miles

    I have no desire for a private body to regulate me. We require transparency and debate.

  • Jason Kuntz
    Jason Kuntz

    This pandemic treaty needs to be stopped, as it would take away each nations soveirnty away, and allow the wicked WHO to promoted their lies and control over everyone. Just another bunch of Nazi’s.

  • Melanie Abbott
    Melanie Abbott

    The “WHO” Pandemic Treaty” is just as bad as the planning for the release of the Covid Virus…SINISTER! We do not need “WHO” running Pandemics!! Stop these lunatics before they kill everyone! In other words, “STOP WHO BEFORE WHO KIILLS YOU!” Get rid of “WHO”. Thank you. M.A,

  • Roger Williams
    Roger Williams

    there must be accountability for all officials involved with the injection fraud and crimes against humanity. humanity needs freedom of speech and bodily autonomy. we say NO to tyranny in all forms especially this abominable proposal for a power grab disguised as a proposed treaty

  • Howard Hopkins
    Howard Hopkins

    You must stop giving our medical freedoms and choices to an International governing organization that may not represent the best interests of Americans.

  • Mark Zeibig
    Mark Zeibig

    I do not want our futures to be controlled and governed by private businesses and corporations that aim to profit from the existence of human beings. I do not want governments to collude with those businesses in order for individuals within governments, or ‘groups’ of people, to benefit from the wider community in a way that is detrimental to that wider community. And these two points are highlighted by the fact of government and corporation secrecy about decisions that impact the wider community, which impedes on the wider community/population to make decisions on who they wish to support to govern them.

  • Micheall Campbell
    Micheall Campbell

    iAm Sign’n because of All that Died & 2Stop the Mass Genocide Against All of the WHOLEWiDEWORLD!

  • LJ Gillis
    LJ Gillis

    This is a travesty and criminal violation of inalienable human rights in total secrecy. Unelected self appointed bureaucrats can not dictate human medical rights and impose surveillance on citizens. Any resolutions will be corrupt and invalid, as this is an act of treason against the people you are mandated to serve. Something this i portant and global reaching must be put to a referendum by the people and the people must be included in the commissions and formulations of any changes. This can not usurp the national autonomy of countries and will not be accepted

  • Mark Dale
    Mark Dale

    There should be no centralised control of public health imposed on a sovereign state for which its people have not democratically voted for.

  • Deirdre McKervey
    Deirdre McKervey

    We need to stop these tyrants!

  • Carolyn Ream
    Carolyn Ream

    I am signing because we need to STOP the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty. We should NEVER sign any treaty with the WHO because we are a sovereign nation!

  • Joan Newton
    Joan Newton

    I do not want the WHO treaty to be adopted at all. The treaty would harm natural human rights and human health and freedom.

  • Mary Likoudis
    Mary Likoudis

    To Stop the Adoption of Pandenic treaty.

  • Kathleen Lavelle
    Kathleen Lavelle

    I do not trust the WHO. They are funded by Bill Gates.

  • Ann Wedefelt
    Ann Wedefelt

    There shall not be any pandemic treaty. There is no need for such a thing. We don’t want a totalitarian society.

  • Emil Pitschujew
    Emil Pitschujew

    The handling of the pandemic was a farce. WHO is a corrupt institution as we have observed for more than two years now. This needs to stop.

  • Lesley Burns
    Lesley Burns

    The WHO have failed dismally to display their ability to manage any pandemic, past or into the future. The WHO are highly UNTRUSTWORTHY! I do not want my country to be controlled by the unelected bureaucrats at the WHO.

  • Mary Plumley
    Mary Plumley

    I am signing because I am against giving unelected officials power over me and the other citizens of Canada which only elected official should wield.

  • Cheryl Little
    Cheryl Little

    I do not believe that the WHO has the right to tell any nation how to handle a pandemic. I is one thing to set guidelines for necessary worldwide functions such as the distribution of medicine but to mandate vaccine passports. NEVER!!!! The United States is a sovereign nation, and each state has the right to attend to their citizens needs according to the will of these citizen.

  • Brian Yates
    Brian Yates

    By excluding participation from citizens of the world, the WHO displays non-transparency. It’s clear that this is just a power grab by the WHO, who are unelected and beyond prosecution.

  • Paola Dooly
    Paola Dooly

    Dear WHO Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB), Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB. 1. The draft treaty has no validity because, as written, it allows for accelerated regulatory authorizations of experimental medical interventions during emergencies, despite the fact that the unequivocal rules of science and ethics require time for scientific and legal review. In Article 7 (pages 15-16) the “WHO CA+” supports speeding up the process by which emergency drugs and vaccines are to be approved. The Siracusa Principles requires the science to be proved in order to justify the necessity and strictly required by the exigencies of the situation, and the draft treaty fails to take this serious situation into account, allowing for the most burdensome measures to be rushed and unnecessarily imposed on nations prior to ensuring safety trials are complete, at the edicts of the WHO health monopoly global security apparatus. 3. I am especially offended by and opposed to the part about legalizing persecution and censorship because it violates jus cogens norms: “tackling misleading misinformation or disinformation would also “strengthen research into the behavioural barriers and drivers of adherence to public health measures, confidence and uptake of vaccines, use of therapeutics and trust in science and government institutions.” 4. There are a series of issues with the draft treaty, including definitions and legal obstacles to its adoption at this time. UNDEFINED WORDS: The “WHO CA+” repeatedly used the following words in an inherently arbitrary and capricious manner, even though none of them are legally defined. Article 1 (page 11) Pandemic – 112 times Recovery – 52 times Response – 106 times Public Health – 44 times Preparedness – 74 times Equity – 32 times Prevention – 68 times Pandemic Response Products – 27 times IGNORING THE OBVIOUS: The “WHO CA+” never once mentions any of the following terms: Doctor, early treatment, natural, vitamins, herbs, gain-of-function, complimentary or traditional medicines, essential medicines. Why not? Shouldn’t they have a role in public health instruments? 5. I protest the concept in Article 12, where the “WHO CA+” advocates for a “global peer review mechanism” to assess each nation’s preparedness, and in Article 20 (page 27) it also advocates that at its first meeting, the “Governing Body” of the “WHO CA+” will approve procedures and mechanisms to promote compliance. I believe this would create mandatory unnecessary meddling into the sovereign affairs of the member states. IHR protects nations right to create their own sovereign legislation for health policy, which includes preparedness assessments that varies country to country. It also creates a burden on member states and serves no legitimate purpose, contrary to public interest. 6. I protest Article 18 (pages 25-26) which makes it clear that if the “WHO CA+” is enacted, then an enormous amount of money is going to be transferred to businesses that provide “pandemic response products.’ Based on the exorbitant waste this declared pandemic and inequitable lack of funding of therapeutics which would have ended the alleged pandemic, this article sounds like a blank check for WHO approved products which may be wholly unnecessary or worse, exacerbate the problem, because WHO has a history of bad decisions, mainly because they are at the whim of funders who seek to benefit by the policies (and pandemic preparedness and response contracts) of WHO. 7. I protest the lack of willingness of the WHO to include mandatory mechanisms for coordination with non state actors, Civil Society Organizations (CSO’s), primary vulnerable relevant stakeholders and the public. Page 22 -“Enhance WHO’s central role as the directing and coordinating authority on international health work, mindful of the need for coordination with entities in the United Nations system and other intergovernmental organizations;” 8. I protest Article 17 (page 25) which describes, as part of “a national One Health Action Plan” which, in the human and animal sectors: “optimizes consumption, increases investment in, and promotes equitable and affordable access to new medicines, diagnostic tools, vaccines and other interventions. The problem is the language is arbitrary and could lead to overfunding of vaccines and underfunding of therapeutics, when there should be a mandatory review board of outsiders to ensure the WHO stakeholders adequately fund therapeutics right off the bat, rather than allow funders to threaten the world “no one is safe until a needle in every arm”, and WHO gets caught up in the whims of funder stakeholders who benefit from vaccines that cannot be legally allowed if therapeutics exist. Basically, the fact is, many people believe it looks like WHO is a vaccine peddler mafia who intentionally inequitably failed to fund therapeutics in order to inequitably push the non vaccine gene experimental injections and that should probably be addressed to restore public faith in WHO. The draft is dangerous as written because it fails to take this internal structural defect of WHO being at the whim of vaccine monopoly funders into account. It is not in dispute Tedros confessed WHO is at the whim of funders. 9. I protest Article 19 (pages 26-27) which would institute a new bureaucracy for the “WHO CA+” that would essentially duplicate the World Health Assembly with a “Governing Body” ruled over by two Presidents and four Vice-Presidents and a Conference of the Parties. This body is presumably bloated and expensive whilst essentially redundant and unnecessary. 10. I protest Page 13 – “Central role of WHO – As the directing and coordinating authority in global health, and the leader of multilateral cooperation in global health governance, WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems.’ This is false wishful thinking, in reality WHO is absolutely not fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems. So far, during the unnecessarily declared pandemic the WHO’s oversight has been wholly unscientific, reckless, disastrous, resulting in loss of life and health. I protest centralized health under WHO and their unscientific blanket measures which are disproportionate on its face. This is a rebuttable presumption, therefore, I am refuting the WHO’s presumption that the WHO is fundamental to strengthening pandemic prevention, preparedness, response and recovery of health systems! 11. This is a legal notice and demand that participation of ALL relevant stakeholders is required by WHO INB to gain public acceptance of this potential pandemic treaty. Because the INB promised open participation of all relevant stakeholders but failed to actually include primary vulnerable stakeholders (who repeatedly asked to be included) the treaty design process, I believe the draft and final version of the pandemic treaty is invalid until all of the INB identified relevant stakeholders that spoke at the first pandemic treaty hearing April 12,13, 2022, and the second hearing by video, such as Interest of Justice and others are included in a meaningful way. Thank you, Interest of Justice

  • matt lewis
    matt lewis

    I will not bow to one world governance

  • Christine Vorderegger
    Christine Vorderegger

    I really feel the WHO is not working for humanity but is attempting a global coup for power, control, depopulation and money. Why do they wish to remove countries’ medical sovereignty? It’s not in the best interests of the people of the world. Not at all.

  • kerry douglas
    kerry douglas

    We as a people do not comply to secret negotiations within W.H.O. We do not comply to secret treaties that are a political power grab. The W.HO has no political or health standing in individual countries.

  • Jeff Krick
    Jeff Krick

    I am signing because i don’t want to give away my Constitutional Rights as a US Citizen to be undermined by a foreign entity such as the WHO.

  • Anahita Kar
    Anahita Kar

    No treaty should be signed in secrecy

  • Maureen Berry
    Maureen Berry

    I am signing this petition because I am in complete agreement with the letter in this regard from Interest of Justice.

  • Andreas Witt
    Andreas Witt

    Stop the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty

  • Anneke Driessen van Berendonk
    Anneke Driessen van Berendonk

    Omdat dit misdaden tegen de menselijkheid zijn.

  • Jens Barman
    Jens Barman

    WHO is Snakes and totaly unelected!

  • Diane Gregor
    Diane Gregor

    This must stop

  • Christine Cahalin
    Christine Cahalin

    I want the UK to leave the WHO. It’s secrecy and overreaching intent have no place in a free world. It’s members are unelected. They demand powers beyond their abilities. I do not submit to any of their plans for massive restrictions on freedom of movement, bodily autonomy and the freedom to be human.

  • Susan Dey
    Susan Dey

    Simply, the WHO has no rights over our sovereign nations. We demand participation in the design of this Treaty. They shouldn’t even have the right to draw up such a treaty.

  • Irene Hansen
    Irene Hansen

    I’m so tired of all this bullshit!!

  • Geoff mc kemey
    Geoff mc kemey

    I control my body nobody else.!

  • Timo Turpeinen
    Timo Turpeinen

    I am in complete agreement with the letter in this regard from Interest of Justice.

  • Deborah Strong
    Deborah Strong

    I want to stop the adoption of the W.H.O. Pandemic Treaty

  • Deborah Thompson
    Deborah Thompson

    I am signing because I am against any transfer of power from our sovereignty.

  • Victoria Panayi
    Victoria Panayi

    We human beings all have rights to make our own decisions, especially regarding our health.

  • Michael Kapusin
    Michael Kapusin

    The WHO are brazenly trying to control the world . I do NOT consent .

  • Marcia Niemi
    Marcia Niemi

    Every country should have the right to our local elected officials making decisions that affect our lives

  • Denise Ketterer
    Denise Ketterer

    I don’t support the WHO having this much power.

  • Christina Hügli
    Christina Hügli

    Weil ich der WHO nicht traue und selber bestimmen will, was in meinen körper kommt.

  • Margaret Ellis
    Margaret Ellis

    Because this is evil.

  • James Hamilton
    James Hamilton

    Unelected unaccountable officials should have no power over anyone, directly or indirectly.

  • Lynne Zawalick
    Lynne Zawalick

    The WHO has turned into a political entity with power they should not have. They do not have the health interests of the people but their own interests. And therefore I am against this “treaty.”

  • Carol Sweeney
    Carol Sweeney

    As a US citizen these organizations has no jurisdiction in my life.

  • Heather Mc|Gowan
    Heather Mc|Gowan

    No pandemic treaty

  • Angela O'Neill
    Angela O'Neill

    The WHO has clearly demonstrated that it has no interest in health but to share in control of world government so that more of humanity can be maimed and killed by forced injections.

  • Ralph Williams
    Ralph Williams

    I hate corruption. The WHO is very corrupt!

  • Ewa Rakowski
    Ewa Rakowski

    I want to stop genocides

  • Rich VandenBerg
    Rich VandenBerg

    I am opposed to this treaty, and any single, centralized controller of health and wellness.

  • Dave Johnson
    Dave Johnson

    I have the right to make decisions for me and my families health. No government has any right to control us.

  • Kimberly Taylor
    Kimberly Taylor

    W.H.O. Needs to be stopped. This organization is completely corrupt, and they should not have any power over our healthcare systems.

  • Carolann Hodgson
    Carolann Hodgson

    The WEF, WHO are globalists wanting to impose nedical, climate control…lies & fraud

  • John Butler
    John Butler

    I am a free man, therefore I do not consent and I will not comply and I will not enter into a contract with the WHO even if my government tries to sign me up on behalf of me…

  • Jo Heylen
    Jo Heylen

    WHO showed they’re not focusing on citizens well-being, and place technology above humanity. WHO is not elected and is financed by big coorporations.

  • john timbrell
    john timbrell

    The secrecy of what should be in the public arena indicates evil people are seeking to control us.

  • Elzbieta Mroz
    Elzbieta Mroz

    I want my country to be independent and respects the Constitution.

  • Rob Redhead
    Rob Redhead

    This treaty is repugnant to democratic process.

  • Dawn Maness
    Dawn Maness

    The WHO must not be allowed to consolidate power after they lied and covered up the origins of CCP VIRUS! They are globalists elites that steal the people’s money and use them as lab experiments for their transhumanist agenda.

  • Kenneth David Peaker
    Kenneth David Peaker

    All these gangster scoundrels and their greed-filled lunacy need to be taken out back and… stopped!

  • Bill Yakubiw
    Bill Yakubiw

    I have sovereignty over my health and my country should be sovereign too

  • Nigel Wells
    Nigel Wells

    i claim freedom and justice

  • Deborah Sacco
    Deborah Sacco

    Never can this be allowed to happen!

  • Joan Randell
    Joan Randell

    The WHO is an arm of entities not acting in the best interest of Humanity. They are not appointed by the people for the people. I will never support or recognize them as an authority in my life.

  • Renee Bahrij
    Renee Bahrij

    The WHO has to be cut off of all authoritative administration, health decisions. Citizens of the world are in charge of their health personally and need no direction nor mandate from the WHO.

  • Patricia Herrera
    Patricia Herrera

    I strongly oppose the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty the week of Dec. 5th, 2022. The treaty draft just released has excluded participation and that is unacceptable.

  • pj gildernew
    pj gildernew

    There should NEVER be a one size fits all on how to govern or respond to a crisis, especially a medical one!! Millions of people could have been saved worldwide if the medical community used hydroxychloroquine from the outset as was proven by many well-known doctors. The WHO knew this and decide to have people die for a lie and big pharma. So there should NEVER be a “pandemic treaty”!

  • Calvin Mulligan
    Calvin Mulligan

    I despise totalitarianism.

  • Devin Benson
    Devin Benson

    We mustn’t go down this path of insanity. We are a free people!

  • Timothy Turner
    Timothy Turner

    Sick of who un nwo no one has the right to tell our country how to be ran.

  • Catherine Henninger
    Catherine Henninger

    The WHO is a corporation, they are not elected and their decisions are irrelevant.

  • Lorraine Dougan
    Lorraine Dougan

    This is about controlling people’s bodily autonomy world wide. It is about denying people their God given right to decide what treatments to take, based on their knowledge of their unique physiology. This is about driving more profits to companies, governmental organizations, and international organizations, to the detriment of true human beings. We are being treated as slaves. This needs to stop NOW!

  • Tracie Smith
    Tracie Smith

    Crimes against humanity. The WHO can’t be trusted.

  • Roberta Jamieson
    Roberta Jamieson

    The WHO has no business attempting this fraudulent power grab from sovereign countries and their peoples.

  • Sue Dekany
    Sue Dekany

    a few people do not have the right to decide my medical treatment for me.

  • Jennifer Lee
    Jennifer Lee

    I am signing because we dont need anymore laws or mandates for vaccines.

  • Jill Bargen
    Jill Bargen

    No one should choose for any other human any medication or health choice.

  • L.
    L.

    The WHO and the corporate governments did not give us life so they have no right to take it away, or to undermine it in any way!!

  • margaret roughley
    margaret roughley

    The recent problems caused by the poor leadership of the WHO and many of it’s financial backers during the non pandemic should stand as documented proof that the organisation is not fit for purpose and should be abolished. The people responsible for these crimes should be imprisoned at the very least.

  • Liona shareing
    Liona shareing

    its wrong

  • Barb McKee
    Barb McKee

    Stop the W.H.O Pandemic Treaty!we need to be included in this draft!

  • Paula Lindley
    Paula Lindley

    Stop the Adoption of the Pandemic Treaty the week of December 5-10th.

  • Fiona Hughes
    Fiona Hughes

    The WHO is not in charge or in control of the world. This is a not democratic agreement. The WHO is discussing a treaty against human rights in a bid to control everyone’s movements and information. MUST BE STOPPED.

  • Joan Martin
    Joan Martin

    It’s just a control and power grab !

  • Roxanne Pryhorocki
    Roxanne Pryhorocki

    Bill Gates’s Who is setting up the citizens of the world with genocide in mind. Our bodies are not science experiments to be forced into deadly vaccinations and drugs. Our personal freedoms depend on this treaty being denied forever with full disclosure of the evil planned.

  • malini VARSHNEY
    malini VARSHNEY

    Please open the process to restore trust in the WHO which is lacking due to the monopolistic tendencies of the WHO to design health policy without the input of relevant stakeholders with a wide body of knowledge to share. This exclusion of meaningful participation violates jus cogens norms and is unacceptable in the setting of monopolized centralized global public health under the direction and control of the WHO INB.

  • Geoff Fisk
    Geoff Fisk

    Stop your adoption of the Pandemic Treaty!!

  • George Boucher
    George Boucher

    This treaty has nothing to do with public health. This is by design to control the people of the world in an effort to bring about the great reset.

  • Belinda Dodd
    Belinda Dodd

    I do not agree with vaccine mandates or passports.

  • Judy Leman
    Judy Leman

    I am signing because I do no believe in those “C” words, censorship, compliance!!

  • Marlene Rock
    Marlene Rock

    I am protesting adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.

  • Jesse Cifuni
    Jesse Cifuni

    I believe in justice. I believe in truth.

  • Linda (Lynn) Gelz
    Linda (Lynn) Gelz

    YOU are not Excluded in a treaty after knowingly committing crimes against humanity. You must pay the ultimate price!

  • Samantha Hepplewhite
    Samantha Hepplewhite

    I will not comply…period. Enough!

  • Andrea Mann
    Andrea Mann

    I am so so tired of the government and pharmaceutical overrreach

  • Laurie Miller
    Laurie Miller

    I am against giving power to the WHO in regards to our health. One Health for everyone is not workable. I don’t believe people should be forced to insert toxic vaccines and medicines into their body against their will. It violates basic human rights. I will never comply with their oppressive orders.

  • Jeanne Coulson
    Jeanne Coulson

    To help save our Republic!! liberty and Justice for all

  • Madeleine Fernandez
    Madeleine Fernandez

    These people are guilty of crimes against humanity!!!

  • Michelle Kenyon
    Michelle Kenyon

    I completely disagree with this treaty and believe it will eliminate the sovereignty of all nations involved.

  • Bernadette De Marneffe
    Bernadette De Marneffe

    Voor de VRIJHEID, Waarheid.

  • Wanda Whitney
    Wanda Whitney

    this isn’t about helping our health, but a power grab and money grab.

  • Nancy Miller
    Nancy Miller

    WHO shouldn’t be in charge of our health issues! They are a power hungry group who want us all dead!

  • Jeanne Beiser
    Jeanne Beiser

    We need to stop the elites and their global plan to strip us of our freedoms!

  • Mike Hanes
    Mike Hanes

    NO PANDEMIC TREATY!

  • Wendy Mcgonigal
    Wendy Mcgonigal

    I don’t like to be governed by people I didn’t elect

  • Robert
    Robert

    This is a disgusting totalitarian power grab.

  • Peggy Fitzpatrick
    Peggy Fitzpatrick

    I do not want our freedoms lost

  • David Morrison
    David Morrison

    I’ve lost faith in this organization and what their real narrative is

  • Jeannette Barras
    Jeannette Barras

    The WHO has no right to tell us what to do

  • Jytte Fredholm Ferreira
    Jytte Fredholm Ferreira

    WHO ha commited crimes against humanity and I demand that justice is served and severe sentences delivered to all involved and responsible no matter what position they hold or have held

  • R. Denice Brown-Sweeney
    R. Denice Brown-Sweeney

    the W.H.O. has repeatedly shown itself as incompetent, manipulative, conniving, and ignorantly tyrannical with no place in existence and this just in the last 3 years.

  • ronald nagel
    ronald nagel

    each state should control its people not the who

  • Paola Dooly
    Paola Dooly

    We did NOT elect you, you don’t represent us and therefore cannot make decisions for us. Shame on you for trying to do this.

  • Margaret McGillen
    Margaret McGillen

    Sovereign countries do not need the WHO.

  • Mark Deacon
    Mark Deacon

    Every sovereign nation must be able to independently determine its policies and actions for the health and wellbeing of its citizens and not be pressured, controlled or coerced by the WHO

  • Wendy Luttrell
    Wendy Luttrell

    I am signing because I am against everything the WHO is doing to restriction our rights and freedoms. Stop this treaty

  • Gerardine Scully
    Gerardine Scully

    I am signing because I believe that what the WHO top officials have and are doing is unethical and against our human rights.

  • Mark Deacon
    Mark Deacon

    I believe in the sovereign independence of a state to determine what’s best for its citizens and not the WHO

  • Janice Elbert
    Janice Elbert

    I am signing because of WHO deception. You have willingly done harm to Humanity, and for what?? You DO NOT get immunity from Humanity and you will be held accountable!!

  • ERIC BLACK
    ERIC BLACK

    justice is needed for the crimes committed

  • Steve Esslinger
    Steve Esslinger

    No so-called world authority should be able to dictate to citizens of any country, especially the USA!!

  • ERIC BLACK
    ERIC BLACK

    they have to be stopped

  • Lola Fuller
    Lola Fuller

    The WHO can go screw themselves, I didn’t vote for their murderous selves

  • Livina Hiacinth
    Livina Hiacinth

    The WHO is not needed in Canada or any other Sovereign country.

  • Lola Fuller
    Lola Fuller

    The WHO can go screw themselves, I didn’t vote for their murderous selves in ANY capacity

  • Brown Kevin
    Brown Kevin

    my body : my choice. kick out the tyrants

  • Billy Markert
    Billy Markert

    This Wrong

  • Stephen Everhardt
    Stephen Everhardt

    I am signing because the WHO cares nothing about people all they want to do is to line their pockets with dirty money.

  • Leslie Faulkner
    Leslie Faulkner

    I do not believe this is necessary. Vaccines ruin our immune systems

  • Tom Trollip
    Tom Trollip

    What they are proposing is criminal

  • Alice Despard
    Alice Despard

    This is a scheme to commit democide against humanity and must be stopped NOW.

  • Sally Davis
    Sally Davis

    I do not agree with your secret deals.

  • kristina wiese
    kristina wiese

    not agreeing to this & i have not elected any of these to represent me.. i will not have my souverenity taken of me..

  • Maureen Sullivan
    Maureen Sullivan

    It is the right thing to do to protect humanity

  • Clint Alexander
    Clint Alexander

    I am a citizen of this world and an American National. I do not give up any rights to Speak, Religion, Report(press), nor my right to Bare Arms, nor any right over my sovereign body nor the sovereign land that I am on.

  • Dorothea T
    Dorothea T

    stop the WHO pandemic treaty

  • Johane Joy
    Johane Joy

    STOP the adoption of the WHO pandemic treaty

  • Kim Stordy
    Kim Stordy

    Fraud and Crimes Against Humanity

  • William Conklin
    William Conklin

    Freedom of Choice – if the Left gets it for Pregnancy; then we all should have it for any Vaccine!!

  • MS lumina
    MS lumina

    The WHO is sneaking, sulking , manipulating, behind closed doors because the evil it is doing would not be countenanced if done in the open. The WHO no longer does health, it does killing, stealing, lying, propaganda, and societal rape on every aspect of human life. It is Evil. And the evil doers need to be brought to justice.

  • Jason Singer
    Jason Singer

    The who needs to go

  • Janet Simpson
    Janet Simpson

    No one has the right to make decisions about our future without our input.

  • Ina Gabler
    Ina Gabler

    Tendros and other officials of The WHO, including Bill Gates who owns a controlling interest in The Who, must be tried for Crimes Against Humanity for intentional genocide and seeking to establish global tyranny for their own gain.

  • Maria Schiller
    Maria Schiller

    The adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty must be stopped! We need transparency and full participation.

  • alan wallis
    alan wallis

    I am signing because the W.H.O needs to be transparent.

  • Marien Breen
    Marien Breen

    I do not want the W.H.O. in charge of anything.

  • Lyn Felsman
    Lyn Felsman

    Justice must be served

  • Juliette Wood
    Juliette Wood

    This treaty is based on false information and is meant to give control over the individual and the nation to this one incompetent and dishonest group of people.

  • Larry Holm
    Larry Holm

    WHO’s poor track record, criminal membership, crimes against humanity, and abject ignorance of true health negate any and all claims they may posture over the planet and the people. Fraud vitiates all. Close the WHO down and replace with ethical people of good will and true service without criminal profiteering political incentives.

  • Fred Gadd
    Fred Gadd

    These criminals need to be brought to justice.If they get away with this the world would be lost

  • Juliette Wood
    Juliette Wood

    This treaty is dishonest and a disgusting display of power-hungry people trying to do what they will without regard to the individuals and countries they are trying to control.

  • Geraldine May
    Geraldine May

    Unelected officials have no business or authority to make health decisions for humanity. Health is a personal issue to be decided by each person with no outside interference.

  • Sue Shipman
    Sue Shipman

    This is illegal.

  • George Bodley
    George Bodley

    I’m opposeed to vaccine mandates and vaccine passports in general, and it is even more egregious when the alleged vaccines are my in large ineffective yet highly dangerous.

  • Marianne Bollinger
    Marianne Bollinger

    Im signing because crime against humanity 1 Enough is enough stop!

  • Jason-Anthony Rapp
    Jason-Anthony Rapp

    I believe in human freedom and self responsibility

  • Mike Adams
    Mike Adams

    I believe in bodily autonomy. WHO is a non elected organization who should not be dictating health policies of sovereign countries

  • Marie Clodge
    Marie Clodge

    I do NOT AGREE with all the secret meetings, amendments and attempts to remove global citizens GOD GIVEN SOVEREIGN RIGHTS by the WHO. They are a totally corrupt organization being funded by NGO’s who are clear eugenicists.

  • Victor Jasin
    Victor Jasin

    Seeking to formalize their criminal acts will not change the nature of their actions and the outcomes (death and INJURY to the compliant). No fines. Jail time and death sentences only. YMMV

  • Tracey Boyd
    Tracey Boyd

    The WHO see themselves as a global government. They are not elected by the people of any country. They need to be disbanded.

  • Evangeline Marie
    Evangeline Marie

    I like freedom!

  • David Rippel
    David Rippel

    No international organization should have the power to infringe on sovereign countries

  • Norm Gadsby
    Norm Gadsby

    I am against world slavery disguised as a health emergency

  • Gerald Smith
    Gerald Smith

    I have family members and friends who were all forced and put under duress to take this poisonous shots and which they are all having various side effects.

  • Sheila Johnson
    Sheila Johnson

    The “covid ruse” needs to be stopped and big pharma must be held to account for the lies and corruption they have purposely used to further their agenda.

  • Meredith Klitzke
    Meredith Klitzke

    The WHO has no business dictating how we as a country handle anything!!!

  • alyson horne
    alyson horne

    WHO is not an elected representative of my human birth rights! STOP them controlling humanity!!

  • Jo Turcotte
    Jo Turcotte

    I think no organisation anywhere shoul have so much power. It’s too dangerous.

  • Debbie Bowerman
    Debbie Bowerman

    Disband the WHO, Which is run by The WEF

  • Caroline Gerlach-Berthaud
    Caroline Gerlach-Berthaud

    Il devient de plus en plus connu comment cette institution est corrompue et mauvaise à tous les niveaux!

  • A Soppelsa
    A Soppelsa

    Awakening the lions

  • Bert Goodrich
    Bert Goodrich

    I oppose the WHO’s power grab. Shills for the WEF.

  • Wayne & Mary Caldwell
    Wayne & Mary Caldwell

    I am signing because those that have done such damage and death to all persons around the world. They need to be held accountable for their evil actions.

  • Marcia Niemi
    Marcia Niemi

    This is criminal

  • kim lafferty
    kim lafferty

    I am very concerned about what has transpired over the past few years and what is being covered up. I want to remain a human who has control over my body and the decisions I make and not be controlled by a global elite dictatorship.

  • david denny
    david denny

    This treaty needs to be stopped immediately, given that it calls itself a treaty but has only been emplaced under the radar using WEF-sponsored stooges in many sovereign nations. Since no public debate has been opened on the benefits and risks of yielding sovereignty, any such treaty is per se without merit. Equally, attempts to have national functionaries sign “on behalf of” implicates themselves in charges of acts hostile to the elected government.

  • Gale Frost
    Gale Frost

    I object to the need for any Pandemic Treaty. It is up to individual governments to decide how to proceed as each country has different cultures and criteria.

  • Christine Giese
    Christine Giese

    I am signing this petition because I refuse to have my rights as a Human being to Health and Happiness trampled on illegally. This is the Globalist dream for Global Governance and it is a total despicable $ham for these evil sold-out Eugenicist criminals. ‘

  • Deb Grace
    Deb Grace

    It’s time they all go down

  • Aww Aww
    Aww Aww

    I care a lot

  • Marilyn Hogan
    Marilyn Hogan

    I am a Sovern wo-man and we all need to stand against this huge corporation the W.H.O. for committing crimes against my own my God given rights to have FREEDOM over my own Body and my own Life

  • Daniel Sanchez
    Daniel Sanchez

    Apoyo la libertad para decidir sobre mi cuerpo.

  • Daniela Hauptmann
    Daniela Hauptmann

    this treaty will enslave humanity

  • Anthony Reid
    Anthony Reid

    I do not regard the WHO as an unbiased representative of science. Additionally, each country and district within a country has different conditions and different needs during a health crisis. They should not be made to give up their autonomy for a one size fits all approach that may or most likely may not be supported by science.

  • Coleene Quinn
    Coleene Quinn

    my government has not told me anything about this nor asked for community opinion

  • Kathy Katz
    Kathy Katz

    Because it is an invasion of my freedoms over myself and my own body. This is an evil power grab for control over Humanity and I find it disgusting.

  • Deborah Sacco
    Deborah Sacco

    Medical Tyranny must be stopped.

  • Deborah Sacco
    Deborah Sacco

    Medical Tyranny must be stopped at all costs!

  • dietmar rake
    dietmar rake

    no international treaties anymore

  • sharon sinner
    sharon sinner

    W.H.O. should not be allowed to end any nation, any countries sovereignty in any matter, and certainly not end individual and personal health care rights which are given to all human beings from Creator GOD

  • Kevin Pretty
    Kevin Pretty

    I have the god given right to put what I want in my body, and not be subject to genetic therapy and mrna injections

  • Shelly Hamid
    Shelly Hamid

    This treaty poses a direct threat to public health and imposes medical tyranny against the global population

  • Angelena Cook
    Angelena Cook

    I am signing because I am a human being who demands the right to decide my health options, travel plans, shopping trips, banking etc. which is really where this treaty is heading. Like the “vaccines” it has nothing to do with health.

  • Kim Walsh
    Kim Walsh

    I am signing because I do not agree with this proposal

  • ASOCIACIÓN POLICÍAS POR LA LIBERTAD
    ASOCIACIÓN POLICÍAS POR LA LIBERTAD

    NUESTRA ASOCIACIÓN APOYARÁ CUALQUIER ACCIÓN EN PRO DE LA VIDA, LA LIBERTAD Y LA JUSTICIA Y ESTÁ PETICIÓN LO ES

  • Kathleen Quinlan
    Kathleen Quinlan

    These folks are dirty. Have no such right. Unelected. Agenda not sanctioned by citizen body

  • john thoma
    john thoma

    stop tyranny.

  • Sigrid Welder
    Sigrid Welder

    I wholeheartedly support this petition.

  • Gabi Ostler
    Gabi Ostler

    diese Übergriffigkeit der WHO gestoppt werden muss. Jeder hat das Recht selbst über seinen Körper zu entscheiden. Diese Impfungen richten großen Schaden an .

  • Maria Nielsen
    Maria Nielsen

    I care!!

  • Katherine Dadley
    Katherine Dadley

    They have already been successful in bringing about the 2020 pandemic because we weren’t prepared but they CAN’T get away with it a second time!!

  • Louise Knight
    Louise Knight

    I believe the WHO, UN and WEF are criminal organisations, who want total control over all people.

  • Tony Joyce
    Tony Joyce

    I sign this petition because I believe in freedom of choice for this generation and future generations .

  • Jens Barman
    Jens Barman

    We need justice!

  • Matthew Kelly
    Matthew Kelly

    The WHO are totally corrupted pharmaceutical conflicts of interest. Therefore unfit to represent anything to the world.

  • Pasi Slonje
    Pasi Slonje

    I am signing because I want to see justice being done for the sake of humanity.

  • Kalle Pihlajasaari
    Kalle Pihlajasaari

    TURN OFF OPT-OUT UPDATES! STOP BEING PART OF THE PROBLEM!

  • Gerald Nolan
    Gerald Nolan

    the WHO is an independant company and acts outside the law.

  • Heather Beck
    Heather Beck

    I am signing because this is and was not about the worlds health but a power grab, greed and corruption

  • Frank O'Blenis
    Frank O'Blenis

    They KNOW they committed crimes

  • Stephen English
    Stephen English

    I want the Australian government to continue to make all decisions regarding our health at all times including during pandemics.

  • Ramón Martínez
    Ramón Martínez

    The powers that be are plotting against humanity intending its destruction, absolute control and death.

  • Carrie Cannon
    Carrie Cannon

    The WHO has not acted in just for the public in that there is lack of support for early treatment which we know helps. Transparency on the money flow during the pandemic I demand!

  • Geoff mc kemey
    Geoff mc kemey

    We are all free people.

  • Heather Mc|Gowan
    Heather Mc|Gowan

    the WHO is not our government

  • Mary Hill
    Mary Hill

    Each country should maintain their own sovereignty in regards to health care. The WHO was formed to make recommendations and not as a dictatorship.

  • Mary Hill
    Mary Hill

    The WHO should never be allowed to take over healthcare decisions for any sovereign country.

  • Audrey Gonyea
    Audrey Gonyea

    I believe the WHO sho be held accountable for crimes against humanity.

  • Meredith Robinson
    Meredith Robinson

    I want all this nonsense to come to an end now, and all parties responsible to be held accountable.

  • Jenny Bardy
    Jenny Bardy

    I don’t trust any institutions any longer. And especially who. You should go to jail. Laying bastards.

  • Eric BARBAGIOVANNI
    Eric BARBAGIOVANNI

    This must stop

  • stephanie lawner
    stephanie lawner

    I agree with the petition

  • Karen Hughes
    Karen Hughes

    The WHO is an unelected body. The people of the United Kingdom require that democracy is adhered to. The UK is a sovereign nation.

  • Rod Hans
    Rod Hans

    I believe in National Sovereignty and Undeniable Human Rights. The W H O is pretending the Nuremberg Code never happened.

  • Sergio Piumatti
    Sergio Piumatti

    we have never consented to criminal globalist organizations taking over our lives.

  • Howard Phelan
    Howard Phelan

    I stand against satanism and satanists

  • Roberta Jamieson
    Roberta Jamieson

    The WHO is an unelected non governmental organization that has NO BUSINESS in interfering with sovereign nations and their sovereign people!

  • Gerard Schuiringa
    Gerard Schuiringa

    Genocide

  • lorene benoit
    lorene benoit

    we need LOCAL not global governance!

  • Andrea Monge
    Andrea Monge

    I do not accept any contracts, amendments or treaties with the WHO. The WHO has demonstrated to be incompetent as a health organization.

  • Dolores Walton
    Dolores Walton

    The United States of American is never to sign a Pandemic Treaty with the W.H.O. or any other country.

  • Terry Blackburn
    Terry Blackburn

    Like many thousands of others, I have lost friends, been kept apart from my family lost income and basically had my freedom curtailed for the last few years. These tyrannical dictators need to pay for their crimes.

  • Fiona Hughes
    Fiona Hughes

    The W.H.O. seem to have given themselves authority over the public. We did not vote them in, this is not democratic. Conducting secret treaty’s without public inclusion is not democratic. We demand transparency and inclusion on these crucial decisions.

  • Renee Bahrij
    Renee Bahrij

    No adoption of the W.H.O. pandemic treaty. NO.

  • JoAnn Doucet
    JoAnn Doucet

    What i do with my body was given to me by GOD not the WHO. They should not be allowed to go free for hurting so many and those who dies because of this lie.

  • Anna Horler
    Anna Horler

    This treaty has nothing to do with health and everything to do with control.

  • Gayle Mann
    Gayle Mann

    I DO NOT BELIEVE IN THE WHO. I DO BELIEVE WHO IS CORRUPT. AND UNCONSTITUTIONAL.

  • Marleen Laska
    Marleen Laska

    I am signing because the WHO is NOT a sovereign entity like a country…America is a sovereign country that lives by its own rules.

  • Judith Martinez
    Judith Martinez

    This should be handled by each individual country. Not as a treaty by one organization controlled by whom?

  • Philip Sandberg
    Philip Sandberg

    Justice

  • Daniel Qualkinbush
    Daniel Qualkinbush

    No one has the right to force a medical treatment on another, NO ONE! #sicsempertyrannis

  • Laura Sholtz
    Laura Sholtz

    The WHO should not be able to take our Constitutional rights away!

  • Valerie Fayer
    Valerie Fayer

    My husband has suffered brain injury from the injections, and my children and grandchildren are at risk of the long term consequences of brain, lung, heart, and fertility damages as the spike protein toxin factories, their bodies have become, do not shut down. The ongoing damages are pending.

  • Carolyn Jankiv
    Carolyn Jankiv

    Corrupt govt

  • Beth Trewin
    Beth Trewin

    Humanity requires freedom

  • Douglas Dolleman
    Douglas Dolleman

    No we will not forget or forgive. Nuremberg Code WILL Be enforced! We Just Filed W.H.O. Charges For Crimes Against Humanity.

  • Tim Alford
    Tim Alford

    From terrorists to pandemics, non-representative organizations like WHO that are politically influenced can not have authority over sovereign elected governments.

  • Julianne Benson
    Julianne Benson

    We do not want the Pandemic Treaty! NO! Listen to the people not the corrupt WHO!

  • Timothy Turner
    Timothy Turner

    We need to run our own country.they need to be kept out of our business.they shouldn’t be able to tell us to do anything.

  • Rosemarie Cereghino
    Rosemarie Cereghino

    No pandemic treaty concocted by the murderous criminals at W.H.O.

  • Paris Vance
    Paris Vance

    I do not support these vaccines because they are killing innocent people.

  • Anne Cendrine Linder
    Anne Cendrine Linder

    This proposed treaty equivocate the end of human dignity and it must be stopped.

  • kay brunnier
    kay brunnier

    The WHO Has no business telling the USA what to do….Kick them out of everything ..We the people cna decide what is best

  • Mona Kristin Jensen
    Mona Kristin Jensen

    These people are trying to kill mankind, they have to be stopped

  • Gilbert Cormier
    Gilbert Cormier

    I an signing because of the nefarious action that they took against humanity.

  • Chantal Pare Cormier
    Chantal Pare Cormier

    I an signing because of the nefarious action that they took against humanity.

  • Shirley Hodge
    Shirley Hodge

    Stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic treaty for Dec 5,2022 Treaty Draft just released the WHO has excluded participation

  • Judith Maron-Friend
    Judith Maron-Friend

    This is a complete outrage! What has happened to our democracy and our republic. These people are not elected officials and must not have this kind of control over our autonomy, period!

  • Victoria Knox
    Victoria Knox

    They are trying to nullify the rights to self determination of the free people of the world. We must not comply with the Globalists. It’s a ridiculous definition of “pandemic” and they can declare it even if no one in the world has died. They can declare it over hangnails for goodness sake! It’s an excuse to take away our rights by declaring states of emergency.

  • Leslie Iskenderian
    Leslie Iskenderian

    This is not a treaty- it is NOT about our health. This is a power grab designed to make money and clearly cares nothing about the peoples health and well-being…quite the contrary.

  • Trish Barr
    Trish Barr

    The vaccination is killing more people than saving. The tyrants who planned this mass genocide, Along with every single person involved in promoting it, must be brought to trial.

  • Gordon Miller
    Gordon Miller

    They have killed my sister and hundreds of thousands more. It has to stop.

  • Wayne & Mary Caldwell
    Wayne & Mary Caldwell

    I am signing the petition because WHO members need to be held accountable for the deaths and injuries from the so called Covid Vaccines!

  • Elsa Schieder
    Elsa Schieder

    I am signing because it is vital to stop the adoption of the WHO Pandemic Treaty.

  • kerry douglas
    kerry douglas

    An unelected body of persons, do not have the right to stop the people from looking at what will impact on them. If it is secret, they are not forming anything that will be part of what the people of the world agree with. So they hide, like cowards.

  • Sherri Bergman
    Sherri Bergman

    This treaty must be stoppe because it gives too much power to untrustworthy and unelected elites who have no concern for the health and well being of people.

  • Charles Roscoe
    Charles Roscoe

    The WHO shall not overrule the US Constitution and Congress.

  • Christine Vorderegger
    Christine Vorderegger

    The WHO has no right whatsoever to interfere with any nation’s sovereignty or to demand that nations cede their (medical interventions) powers to them. The WHO should be dismantled entirely. They are up to no good at all.

  • Nana Black
    Nana Black

    They have to be exposed

  • Margo Hilkens
    Margo Hilkens

    Because WHO’s actions are not in favor of people’s health, they are harmful. This should be known to the world.

  • rudi skerhu
    rudi skerhu

    this treaty would mean worldwide terror

  • Bernadette De Marneffe
    Bernadette De Marneffe

    Waarheid en vrijheid

  • Mary Wahle
    Mary Wahle

    I believe in Heath freedom and autonomy. I believe in the sovereignty of states and nations.

  • Keith Perry
    Keith Perry

    Everyone involved in the mass genocide needs to be tried for their crimes, then hung

  • Heather McKenzie
    Heather McKenzie

    I love freedom.

  • Paula Day
    Paula Day

    I am signing because the WHO failed miserably in its response to Covid. Because of that failure the institution has neither credibility nor standing to insist on giving itself more power and authority to respond to worldwide health crises in the future.

  • Jerry Blumenthal
    Jerry Blumenthal

    The unelected few cannot rule over the mass.

  • Angela Wolfe
    Angela Wolfe

    no foreign entity needs to know about my health and to dictate my healthcare to me

  • Carreen Eade
    Carreen Eade

    I am signing because centralization is dangerous. If we are all in the same boat and that boat springs a leak we all go down.

  • Marilee Krogel
    Marilee Krogel

    Enough of the WHO stepping out of bounds. They do NOT have the right

  • Mary Robinson
    Mary Robinson

    THIS IS NOT A TREATY. THIS IS NOT ABOUT OUR HEALTH. THIS IS A CORRUPT POWER GRAB TO CONTROL OUR LIVES THE EFFECT IS TO FUNNEL BILLIONS OF DOLLARS INTO THE PHARMACEUTICAL HOSPITAL EMERGENCY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX.

  • Lena Warrington
    Lena Warrington

    Excluding participation of public organizations makes the WHO Pandemic Treaty void. People’s voices must be heard, particularly as you are unelected.

  • Brucha Weisberger
    Brucha Weisberger

    We should never give our sovereignty away.

  • paola amaldi
    paola amaldi

    The Pandemic treaty is a”license” to install a totalitarian control over our most private and precious parts of our life

  • russell cohen
    russell cohen

    Who is stealing my medical freedom

  • Joan Simmons
    Joan Simmons

    no foreign entity needs to know about my health and to dictate my healthcare to me

  • Diane Wiltse
    Diane Wiltse

    We need to be free of the WHO and their agenda

  • Dawn McIntyre
    Dawn McIntyre

    I am signing because there was no real pandemic. There was only pharma marketing and fear porn. The absolute effectiveness of COVID vaccines is .85% so totally unnecessary. 5 vaccines and people are still getting COVID so this is these vaccines are not effective at all. Negative efficacy. Do not continue these policies!

  • Clyde Morron
    Clyde Morron

    I’m signing this petition because the WHO has NO RIGHT to DICTATE THE WORLD & TAKE OUR RIGHTS AWAY!!!

  • Dorothy J. Wight
    Dorothy J. Wight

    Everything I have heard about this treaty points to it being the worst move I have ever heard of, in terms of its applying one-size-fits-all governance at a global level, denying the sovereignty of every nation signing on to it–a hideous abuse of every citizen in every country, and something doomed to go badly for all of us. No nation should ever give up its sovereignty the way this document as drafted proposes we should! It is wrong, and an evil overriding of all our rights.

  • Paul Rezler
    Paul Rezler

    I didn’t vote for The Who and I have NO intention of EVER following anything they supposedly try to force on me a FREE citizen of the United States of America

  • Robert Yoho MD
    Robert Yoho MD

    The USA has a constitution and it should never be abridged by an unelected outside organization.

  • Robert Nichols