Petition to W.H.O. Director General

Stop International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments!

Stop International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments!
5,9K view

The International Health Regulations are existing, legally-binding international law.

The Known IHR amendments would remove respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.

Please sign and save our future!

See the Proposed amendment to Article 3, (which is advised by IHRRC to not adopt), but the States CAN STILL DECIDE TO ADOPT IT!:

December 16, 2022

1,308 Supporters

Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
Wireframe avatar loader
See more...
Letter to
W.H.O. Director General
Head of Legal Affairs
Entire IHRRC
Entire WGIHR

I support the following OPEN LETTER by Interest of Justice:

Notice and Demand to stop IHR Amendments

Our organization Interest of Justice is considered “relevant” and “interested” stakeholder by the INB, which they say in this context includes non-State actors with a demonstrable interest in pandemic preparedness and responses, such as: international organizations; civil society organizations; private sector organizations; philanthropic organizations; scientific, medical and public policy institutions; academic institutions; and other such entities that have relevant knowledge, experience and/or expertise related to pandemic preparedness and response to share.

We claim our organization is being excluded by the WHO and as a result we are being denied our right to communicate with international organizations as we are asserting our responsibility, duty and obligation to defend human rights.

On the basis of our mandate, mission and responsibility, we wish to point out the following

It has come to our attention there are certain ideas & proposals to amend the IHR circulating within the World Health Organisation:

The proposed amendments would:

1. Change the overall nature of the World Health Organization from an advisory organization that merely makes recommendations to a governing body whose proclamations would be legally-binding. (Article 1). This would create an unacceptable imbalance of power detrimental to health.

2. Greatly expand the scope of the International Health Regulations to include scenarios that merely have a “potential to impact public health.”

3. Seek to remove “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of people.” which are legally significant words, and supplant them with arbitrary unilaterally defined words that may conflict with member states definitions and health policy in violation of Article 3(4) (Article 3)

4. Give the Director General of the WHO control over the means of production through an “allocation plan for health products” to require developed states parties to supply pandemic response products as directed. (Article 13A). This is unsustainable and slavery of member states which slavery is legally defined as “being under the will of another”

5. Give the WHO the authority to require medical examinations, proof of prophylaxis, proof of vaccine and to implement contact tracing, quarantine and TREATMENT. (Article 18).

6. Institute a system of global health certificates in digital or paper format, including test certificates, vaccine certificates, prophylaxis certificates, recovery certificates, passenger locator forms and a traveller’s health declaration. (Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6, 7 and 8)

7. Redirect unspecified billions of dollars to the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex with no accountability. (Article 44A)

8. Allow the disclosure of personal health data. (Article 45)

9. Greatly expand the World Health Organization’s capacity to censor what they unilaterally consider to be mis-information and dis-information. (Annex 1, page 36) It cannot be overstated that the ‘Trusted News Initiative’ and UN’s ‘program to combat misinformation and roumers’ are not in conformity with law and as applied ubiquitously worldwide, is a clear overreach and violation of the UN charter and international Human Rights norms. The use of the term “in conformity with the law” in Article 21 of the ICCPR, should not be interpreted to imply any lower standard of legality for limitations on the right of peaceful assembly than other limitations within the ICCPR. It should be the same standard that applies to interpreting the language of “provided by law” within Article 19 of the ICCPR, as elaborated in the Committee’s General Comment No. 34:[1] “For the purposes of paragraph 3, a norm, to be characterized as a “law”, must be formulated with sufficient precision to enable an individual to regulate his or her conduct accordingly and it must be made accessible to the public. A law may not confer unfettered discretion for the restriction of freedom of expression on those charged with its execution. Laws must provide sufficient guidance to those charged with their execution to enable them to ascertain what sorts of expression are properly restricted and what sorts are not.” The laws regarding ‘health misinformation’ do not describe what exact speech is defined as health misinformation, in order to: a) be able to challenge the validity of the science and law to know if its really true or false misinformation (with a final res judicata judgment) and b) to give due process to the people that WHO is applying global censorship to. As a result, the WHO-UN global censorship programs (‘Trusted News Initiative’ and UN’s ‘program to combat misinformation and roumers’) that indisputably confers unfettered discretion for the restriction of freedom of expression on those charged with its execution is in violation of the legal order and absolutely null. Importantly, the creation and execution of the global UN-WHO ‘Trusted News Initiative’ and UN’s ‘program to combat misinformation and roumers’ should ultimately be determined to systematically deny human rights which is a national security threat in all nations. [1] HR Committee, General Comment No. 34 on Article 19: freedoms of opinion and expression, CCPR/C/GC/ 34, 12 September 2011; at para. 25. Conclusion: The persecution and censorship of scientific debate and even peer reviewed studies being suppressed by the WHO is a systematic denial of the human right to equal treatment by design which is reinforcing a grave systemic violation of human rights, which is a vice or defect that negates the very motive, content and purpose for WHO’s existence.  We assert the IHR cannot be legitimately amended to expand the World Health Organization’s capacity to censor what they unilaterally consider to be mis-information and dis-information. (Annex 1, page 36).

10. Create an obligation to build, provide and maintain IHR infrastructure at points of entry. (Annex 10)

The amendments to Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6, 7 and 8 would create unprecidented intrusion into liberty and fundamental freedoms, human rights and autonomy.  The contact tracing and vaccine passport schemes interfere with privacy and dignity, therefore, adopting these unnecessary, overly burdensome, disproportunate, unreasonable and tyrannical policies is tantamount to internationally wrongful acts and under the mandate of our organization they must not be allowed.

Removing respect for dignity human rights infernal freedoms is a grave error for the world health organisation because it is impossible for you to do so this and stay within your legal limits of authority.

Even the mere suggestion and attempt to remove respect for dignity and human rights violates your own stated mission in the WHO constitution and UN Charter.

No international public servant in your position has the right or authority to negotiate, propose or enact any of the aforesaid detrimental policies.

This open letter is to demand that you adhere to your duties and responsibilities, and a drawn from applying any further attempts to subvert the dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of all of the people of earth.

Furthermore, we demand that you abstain from your monopolistic attempts to subvert nationstate sovereign health policy by creating wiggle instruments and definitions which may conflict with national health policy intention is the use of unilaterally draft in terms of art and coercion of member states to agree exceeds the authority granted to the international public servants that work at the world health organisation.

It is our understanding that you have met in secret all week in order to negotiate these spurious amendments to the HR with the intention to propose the final draft on Sunday, January 15, 2023. 

On, and for the record, this is a formal protest and objection of all secret negotiations to design global public health policy by interest of justice.  We are acting on our own behalf, and on behalf of, the international community, as conscientious objectors who are also stakeholders as recognised by the IMB with an interest in pandemic, preparedness and response.

We have written many times to meaningfully participate in the design of the pandemic treaty and IHR Amendmemts. We have demanded to be included on Annex E of the treaty negotiations, with no response.  Our organization, as well as its vulnerable primary stakeholder members are treated with contempt and marginalized by the WHO, through non feasance, denying us right to meaningfully participate and communicate with the WHO in the design of all health policy which may affect us, including these proposed IHR amendments.

It is in the WHO’s best interest to prevent any IHR Amendments which would remove respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms, or allow for vaccine or climate passports, precisely because the WHO will be exceeding granted authority, breaching human rights obligations and clearly interferring with commerce which implies waiving sovereign immunity and accepting responsibility for serious breaches of internationally wrongful acts.

Under our mandate to hold you responsible and in compliance with international law and internal regulations, we demand that any intention to cooperate with any of the aforementioned efforts will be considered in strict violation of international law, and you will be held accountable for such acts.

We do not accept the WHO’s illigitimate authority in this matter because they are clearly attempting to change customary law and just cogens norms do not allow this unnecessary oppression and disrespect to the balance of rule of law, dignity of man and human rights norms. The proposals if enacted pose a serious threat by disrespect to the fundamental freedoms of man.

Frankly, the vaccine passports and other undignified propsals are obscene, outrageous and unconscionable, as well as void. 

We demand the INB, IHRRC, WGIHR, WHO and favored stakeholders that are invited to participate in these secret negotiations stay within their legal and moral limits.  This means the international law and WHO’s prior obligations to protect respect for human rights requires that you do not amend the IHR in such fundamental ways, at this time, without meaningful public participation and lenthy debate, first proving the necessity, proportionality and legality.

It is important to note that under international law and the WHO constitution, at no time will it ever be acceptable to cross out respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms in the IHR or a treaty. 

In our opinion, it reflects very badly upon the WHO, the mere suggestion that this idea was even entertained, and negotiated in secret.  Judging by the public response the WHO has lost a lot of credibility with this outragous attempt to oppress people using international legal instruments to increase power not conferred by law, and to use as a weapon to strip humanity of dignity.

Interest of Justice not only protests and objects to the secret negotiations and spurious proposed IHR amendments, we condemn them as internationally wrongful acts which the WHO is responsible for, if actually proposed and adopted.

The proposed changes to the first principle in Article 3 of the International Health Regulations is in stark opposition to the jus cogens peremptory norms of international human rights law. If adopted, they would unreasonably strike out the following well defined legally significant text:

with the full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons

The verbiage used in treaties to protect human rights would be removed, allowing for the violation of Siracusa Principles and other limits of power.  Furthermore, the new text would exchange well defined legally significant human rights verbiage that is enforceable for people to protect their rights and replace these protections with undefined words that are void for vagueness and exchanging the superior human rights laws and verbiage for these terms could recklessly and needlessly lead to a situation of ambiguity that could strip the people of standard human rights protections.

The proposed amendments to the IHR text is much worse than before and serves no benefit.
 
* The above Open Letter was sent by IOJ to all delegates on January 15, 2023 and the WHO (it was opened by HHS OGA twice) see: https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/last-minute-open-letter-to-stop-the
 
* The legal notice and demand with followthrough in court is organized by Interest of Justice

The following protest of 50 bad amendments is provided by James Roguski. 

Armenia

 

1. DIGITAL ID SYSTEM (page 5)

 

I OPPOSE Armenia’s suggestion to create an electronic digital centralized system for the comprehensive data collection of information regarding “cases” and their “contacts,” and vaccination status.

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, potentially discriminatory based on people’s unalienable right of religious freedom and clearly in violation of people’s unalienable right to travel freely upon the Earth.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Bangladesh

 

2. RECOMMENDATIONS MADE BINDING (Article 1 - page 12)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposed amendment to Article 1 which would seek to alter the definitions of the terms “standing recommendation” and “temporary recommendation” by removing the phrase “non-binding” from each term.

This is an absolutely absurd and shameful attempt to alter the meaning of a basic concept and would fundamentally alter the nature of the International Health Regulations as well as the scope and purpose of the World Health Organization. This proposed amendment must immediately be removed from consideration.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


3. CENTRALIZED CONTROL (Article 13A - page 12)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s claim in their proposed New Article 13A that the World Health Organization should be viewed “as the guidance and coordinating authority of international public health response during Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).”

No such authority shall ever be given to the WHO insofar as it would directly conflict with the sovereign authority of the 194 member nations and the fundamental freedoms of all people.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


4. ALLOCATION PLAN (Article 13A(2) - page 13)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposal in New Article 13A(2) that the World Health Organization “shall develop an allocation plan for health products.”

At no time should any organization be placed in control of the means of production of health products.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


5. ALLOCATION PLAN (Article 13A(3) - page 13)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposal in New Article 13A(3) that the World Health Organization “should identify and prioritize the recipients of health products… and determine the required quantity of health care products for effective distribution to the recipients.”

At no time should any organization be placed in control of the means of production of health products.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


6. ALLOCATION PLAN (Article 13A(5) - page 13)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposal in New Article 13A(5) that member nations “shall ensure the manufacturers within their territory supply the requested quantity of the health products to [the] WHO or other [member nations] as directed by [the] WHO in a timely manner to ensure effective implementation of [the WHO] allocation plan.”

Putting the WHO in charge of the means of production is absolutely absurd.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


7. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Article 44(1) - page 13)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposed amendment to Article 44(1) to change the nature of collaboration and assistance among member nations from voluntary to mandatory.

Article 44: Collaboration and assistance

1. States Parties with assistance from WHO shall collaborate with and assist each other.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


8. INTERFERENCE IN LAWMAKING (Article 44(1d) - page 14)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposed amendment to Article 44(1d) which seeks to mandate member nations and the WHO to become involved in “the formulation of proposed laws and other legal and administrative provisions for the implementation of these regulations.”

Each sovereign nation must be responsible for crafting their own laws and regulations as guided by the people of that nation, not by other nations or by the WHO.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


9. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Annex 1 New 1 bis - page 15)

 

I OPPOSE Bangladesh’s proposed amendment to Annex 1 New 1 bis. which would mandate that “Developed Country States Parties shall provide financial and technological assistance to the Developing Countries States Parties in order to ensure state-of-the-art facilities in developing country States Parties.”

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Brazil

 

10. PHEIC DECISION INSTRUMENT (Annex 2 - pages 19-20)

 

I OPPOSE Brazil’s proposed amendment to Annex 2 in its entirety. Brazil’s proposal to completely change the method by which events would be evaluated in order to determine whether or not they constitute a Public Health Emergency of International Concern is completely and totally without merit, data and scientific backing.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Czech Republic

 

On behalf of the 27 member states of the European Union:

 

Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Republic of Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Sweden.

11. MICROBIAL AND GENETIC MATERIAL (Article 7(2) - page 28)

 

I OPPOSE the European Union’s proposed amendment to Article 7(2) which seeks to require sovereign nations to “make available to WHO the microbial and genetic material and samples related to the notified event.”

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


12. RPHEIC and IHEIC (Article 12 - page 28)

 

I OPPOSE the European Union’s proposed amendment to Article 12 which states that “The Director-General [of the WHO] may determine that an event constitutes a Regional Public Health Emergency of International Concern (RPHEIC) or an Intermediate Health Emergency of International Concern (IHEIC).”

These terms are not defined and giving one man the power to declare an international or regional emergency without restriction is clearly yet another step towards totalitarian dictatorship.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


13. PASSENGER LOCATOR FORMS (Article 23 - page 29)

 

I OPPOSE the European Union’s proposed amendment to Article 23 which seeks to implement “Passenger Locator Forms.”

Article 23 - Health measures on arrival and departure

New paragraph 6: Documents containing information concerning traveller’s destination (hereinafter Passenger Locator Forms, PLFs) should preferably be produced in digital form, with paper form as a residual option. Such information should not duplicate the information the traveller already submitted in relation to the same journey, provided the competence authority can have access to it for the purpose of contact tracing. The Health Assembly may adopt, in cooperation with the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) and other relevant organisations, the requirements that documents in digital or paper form shall fulfill with regard to interoperability of information technology platforms, technical requirements of health documents, as well as safeguards to reduce the risk of abuse and falsification and to ensure the protection and security of personal data contained in such documents. Documents meeting such requirements shall be recognized and accepted by all Parties. Specifications and requirements for PLFs in digital or paper form shall take into account existing widely used systems established at the regional or international level for the issuance and verification of documents. Parties which are low and lower middle income countries shall receive assistance in accordance with Article 44 for the implementation of this provision.

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, potentially discriminatory based on people’s unalienable right of religious freedom and clearly in violation of people’s unalienable right to travel freely upon the Earth.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


14. INTER-OPERABLE DATABASE (Article 35 - page 29)

 

I OPPOSE the European Union’s proposed amendment to Article 35 which seeks to implement requirements to provide access to private health documents in digital or paper form.

Article 35 - General rule (…) 2. Health documents may be produced in digital or paper form, subject to the approval by the Health Assembly of the requirements that documents in digital form have to fulfill with regard to interoperability of information technology platforms, technical requirements of health documents, as well as safeguards to reduce the risk of abuse and falsification and to ensure the protection and security of personal data contained in the health documents. Health documents meeting the conditions approved by the Health Assembly shall be recognized and accepted by all Parties.

Specifications and requirements for certificates in digital form shall take into account existing widely used systems established at the international level for the issuance and verification of digital certificates. Parties which are low and lower middle income countries shall receive assistance in accordance with article 44 for the implementation of this provision.

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, potentially discriminatory based on people’s unalienable right of religious freedom and clearly in violation of people’s unalienable right to travel freely upon the Earth.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


15. TEST, PROPHYLAXIS, VACCINE AND RECOVERY CERTIFICATES (Article 36 - page 30)

 

I OPPOSE the European Union’s proposed amendment to Article 36 which seeks to implement requirements to provide access to private health documents such as test certificates, prophylaxis certificates, vaccine certificates and/or recovery certificates.

Article 36 - Certificates of vaccination or other prophylaxis

3. Other types of proofs and certificates may be used by Parties to attest the holder’s status as having a decreased risk of being the disease carrier, particularly where a vaccine or prophylaxis has not yet been made available for a disease in respect of which a public health emergency of international concern has been declared. Such proofs may include test certificates and recovery certificates. These certificates may be designed and approved by the Health Assembly according to the provisions set out for digital vaccination or prophylaxis certificates, and should be deemed as substitutes for, or be complementary to, the digital or paper certificates of vaccination or prophylaxis.

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, potentially discriminatory based on people’s unalienable right of religious freedom and clearly in violation of people’s unalienable right to travel freely upon the Earth.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


16. LACK OF CLEAR LEGAL BASIS (Comment - page 38)

I OPPOSE the European Union’s aim at “providing a clear legal basis in the IHR allowing for the use of Passenger Locator Forms” and “providing a clear legal basis in the IHR for the use of digital Certificates.” (page 38)

Clearly, the European Union’s attempts to provide “a clear legal basis” by proposing these amendments points to the obvious fact that no such “clear legal basis” currently exists. That is exactly the way it must remain.

The mere existence of this attempted justification supports the obviousness that this is an attempt to implement legal restrictions that do not and should not exist.

These proposed amendments are absolutely unacceptable.

 

Eswatini

 

On behalf of the Member States of the WHO African Region

 

Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi, Cabo Verde, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Chad, Comoros, Congo, Cote d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of Congo, Equatorial Guinea, Eritrea, Eswatini, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Kenya, Lesotho, Liberia, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Mauritania, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, Sao Tome and Principe, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone, South Africa, South Sudan, Togo, Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe.

17. DEFINITION OF HEALTH PRODUCTS (Article 1 - page 43)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to the definition of terms in Article 1.

“health products” include therapeutics, vaccines, medical devices, personal protective equipment, diagnostics, assistive products, cell- and gene-based therapies, and their components, materials, or parts.

“health technologies and know-how” includes organized set or combination of knowledge, skills, health products, procedures, databases and systems developed to solve a health problem and improve quality of life, including those relating to development or manufacture of health products or their combination, its application or usage. “Health technologies” are interchangeably used as “health care technologies”.

-page 43

It is the height of arrogance to declare that “health products” and “health technologies and know-how” do NOT include proper use of diet, vitamins, minerals, herbs and an enormous range of natural therapies that have improved health and saved lives for centuries. This exposes the clear nature of the proposed amendments as the thinly veiled promotional marketing campaign for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex (PHEIC) that it truly is.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


18. STATE PARTIES MUST PROVIDE (Article 13(5) - page 45)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Article 13(5) which states:

Article 13(5) Public health response – WHO Coordinated Response Activities

5. When requested by WHO, States Parties shall provide, to the extent possible, support to WHO-coordinated response activities, including supply of health products and technologies, especially diagnostics and other devices, personal protective equipment, therapeutics, and vaccines, for effective response to PHEIC occurring in another State Party’s jurisdiction and/or territory, capacity building for the incident management systems as well as for rapid response teams.

-page 45

This proposed amendment lays bare and exposes the blatant power grab that is a direct attack upon the sovereignty of individual member nations.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


19. ALLOCATION MECHANISM (Article 13A - pages 46-47)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to create a New Article 13A which states:

VII. Africa Group Proposal: New Article 13A: Access to Health Products, Technologies and Know-How for Public Health Response

1. Immediately after the determination of a public health emergency of international concern under Article 12, the Director General shall make an immediate assessment of availability and affordability of required health products and make recommendations, including an allocation mechanism, to avoid any potential shortages of health products and technologies pursuant to Article 15 or 16 as appropriate.

2. States Parties shall co-operate with each other and WHO to comply with such recommendations pursuant to paragraph 1 and shall take measures to ensure timely availability and affordability of required health products such as diagnostics, therapeutics, vaccines, and other medical devices required for the effective response to a public health emergency of international concern.

3. States Parties shall provide, in their intellectual property laws and related laws and regulations, exemptions and limitations to the exclusive rights of intellectual property holders to facilitate the manufacture, export and import of the required health products, including their materials and components.

4. States Parties shall use or assign to potential manufacturers, especially from developing countries, on a non-exclusive basis, the rights over health product(s) or technology(ies), when the same is/are obtained in the course of research wholly or partially funded by public sources, and is/are identified as required health product(s) or technology(ies) to respond to a PHEIC, with a view to ensure equitable, timely availability and affordability through diversification of production.

5. Upon request of a State Party, other States Parties or WHO shall rapidly cooperate and share relevant regulatory dossiers submitted by manufacturers concerning safety and efficacy, and manufacturing and quality control processes, within 30 days. The dossiers received by a requesting State Party shall be solely used by their regulatory authorities and manufacturers designated by the requesting State Party for the purposes of accelerating the manufacture and supply of product(s) or technology(ies) as well as expediting their regulatory approval. Requesting State Party shall take measures to prevent designated manufacturer(s) from disclosing such information to a third party(ies) except for the purposes of producing and supplying any materials or components to the manufacturer(s) under a contract with non-disclosure provisions.

6. WHO shall take measures to ensure availability and accessibility through the local production of required health products including:

a) develop and publish a list of required health products,

b) develop and publish specifications for the production of required health products,

c) develop appropriate regulatory guidelines for the rapid approval of health products of quality including development of immunogenicity co-relative protection (ICP) for vaccines,

d) establish a database of raw materials and their potential suppliers,

e) establish a repository for cell-lines to accelerate the production and regulatory of similar biotherapeutics products and vaccines,

f) review and regularly update WHO Listed Authorities so as to facilitate appropriate regulatory approvals,

g) any other measures required for the purposes of this provision.

7. The States Parties shall take measures to ensure that the activities of non-state actors, especially the manufacturers and those claiming associated intellectual property rights, do not conflict with the right to the highest attainable standard of health and these Regulations and are in compliance with measures taken by the WHO and the States Parties under this provision, which includes:

a) to comply with WHO recommended measures including allocation mechanism made pursuant to paragraph 1.

b) to donate a certain percentage of their production at the request of WHO.

e) to deposit cell-lines or share other details required by WHO repositories or database established pursuant to paragraph 5.

f) to submit regulatory dossiers concerning safety and efficacy, and manufacturing and quality control processes, when called for by the States Parties or WHO.

At no time should any organization be placed in control of the means of production of health products. No such authority shall ever be given to the WHO insofar as it would directly conflict with the sovereign authority of the 194 member nations and the fundamental freedoms of all people.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


20. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Article 43 - page 48)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Article 43 which would give the Emergency Committee final authority to override policy decisions made by sovereign nations.

WHO shall make recommendations to the State Party concerned to modify or rescind the application of the additional health measures in case of finding such measures as disproportionate or excessive. The Director General shall convene an Emergency Committee for the purposes of this paragraph.

Recommendations made pursuant to paragraph 4 of this Article shall be implemented by the State Party concerned within two weeks from the date of recommendation. State Party concerned may approach WHO, within 7 days from the date of recommendations made under paragraph 4 of this Article, to reconsider such recommendations. Emergency Committee shall dispose the request for reconsideration within 7 days and the decision made on the request for reconsideration shall be final. The State Party concerned shall report to the implementation committee established under Article 53A on the implementation of the decision.

The proposed amendment is a clear power grab that would effectively remove sovereignty from individual member nations and give final authority over policy decisions to the World Health Organization.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


21. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Article 44(1) - page 48)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Article 44(1) which would obligate nations “to collaborate with and assist other nations, in particular developing country States Parties, upon request.”

The proposed amendment would effectively remove sovereignty from individual member nations. Yes, nations should collaborate and assist each other, but to change the language in the regulations to convert voluntary cooperation into an obligation is a violation of national sovereignty.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


22. LEGISLATIVE INTERFERENCE (Article 44(2d) - page 49)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Article 44(2d) which would obligate the WHO to become involved in the “the formulation of laws and other legal and administrative provisions for the implementation of these Regulations.”

This is clearly an unnecessary intrusion into the sovereignty of individual member nations that must not be permitted, not to mention enshrined into international law.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


23. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Article 44(4) - page 49)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s amendment to create a New Article 44(4) because it also seeks to negate the sovereignty of individual member nations.

New 4. Collaboration and Assistance under this Article shall include activities mentioned under Annex 10 of the Regulations and shall be monitored by the implementation committee established under Article 53A.

The details of Annex 10 will be discussed below, but the creation of an “implementation committee” to monitor the “Obligations of Duty to Cooperate” is a clear violation of the fundamental sovereignty of member nations.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


24. FINANCIAL MECHANISM (Article 44A - pages 49-50)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s amendment to create a New Article 44A because it is a ridiculously vague and open-ended money grab.

New Article 44A - Financial Mechanism for Equity in Health Emergency Preparedness and Response

1. A mechanism shall be established for providing the financial resources on a grant or concessional basis to developing countries. Such financial mechanism shall provide the financial assistance to achieve the following purposes:

(i) building, developing, strengthening, and maintaining of core capacities mentioned in Annex 1;

(ii) strengthening of Health Systems including its functioning capacities and resilience;

(iii) building, developing and maintaining research, development, adaptation, production and distribution capacities for health care products and technologies, in the local or regional levels as appropriate.

(iv) addressing the health inequities existing both within and between States Parties such that health emergency preparedness and response is not compromised;

2. The WHA shall make arrangements to implement the above-mentioned provisions, within 24 months of the adoption of this provision, reviewing and taking into existing availability of funds and WHO arrangements for health emergency preparedness and response and whether they shall be maintained.

All of the talk about “equity” boils down to the financial definition of the word “equity”: EQUITY = MONEY.

There is no discussion of the amount of money to be raised nor any details given regarding the method by which its distribution would be determined. Failing to specify the details until 24 months after adoption is absolutely absurd.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


25. PRIVATE HEALTH DATA (Article 45 - page 50)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Article 45 which seeks to enable member nations to give permission to reveal private health data.

This would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right of privacy regarding their health documents. No nation should have the right to reveal personal health data to anyone. That is a private matter and that unalienable right must be protected.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


26. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Annex 1(3) - Page 51)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendment to Annex 1(3) which seeks to force member nations to support in “building, strengthening, developing and maintaining the core capacities” for other member nations.

This is yet another fundamental attack upon the sovereignty of member nations.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


27. PROPAGANDA (Annex 1 4(e) and 5d(v)- pages 51-52)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposed amendments to Annex 1 parts 4(e) and 5d(v) which sound suspiciously like state-financed propaganda.

4(e) to engage and promote people’s participation such as promotion of awareness and cooperation with control and response measures, social and welfare assistance to affected persons etc;

5d(iv) to provide support to the local community level or primary health care response level, including information dissemination through socio-culturally appropriate messages and risk communication management.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


28. FACILITIES AT POINTS OF ENTRY (Annexes 1 and 10 - pages 54-55)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposal to add Annex 1 New 7(ix) Health Systems Capacities to “provide infrastructural facilities at points of entry” (page 54) and Annex 10(2b)(xi) “building and maintaining IHR facilities in points of entry and its operations” (page 55)

Both proposed amendments sound an awful lot like plans to build mandatory quarantine camps.

This proposed amendments are absolutely unacceptable.


29. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Annex 10 - page 54)

 

I OPPOSE The African Region’s proposal to add Annex 10 because it is the clearest and most obvious attempt to destroy the sovereignty of individual nations.

New Annex 10 OBLIGATIONS OF DUTY TO COOPERATE

1. States Parties may request collaboration or assistance from… other States Parties in any of the activities mentioned in paragraph 2 or any other activities in which collaboration or assistance with regard to health emergency preparedness and response become necessary. It shall be obligation of the… States Parties, to whom such requests are addressed to respond to such request, promptly and to provide collaboration and assistance as requested.

Attempting to redefine cooperation as an obligation or duty is linguistic fraud.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

India

 

30. POTENTIAL EMERGENCIES (Article 2 - page 57)

 

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Article 2 which would expand the scope of the IHR to include “all risks with a potential to impact public health” instead of limiting its application to actual, real emergencies.

The use of the phrase “potential to impact” is far too vague to ever be appropriately used in international law. This would make it possible for the Director-General to declare an emergency for nearly any imaginable reason.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


31. Full Respect for Dignity, Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms (Article 3 - page 58)

 

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Article 3 because it is absolutely absurd to even contemplate removing the text: “with full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons.”

The act of even proposing this amendment is simply shameful.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


32. Intermediate Health Alert (Article 12 - pages 61-62)

 

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Article 12 because it would essentially give authority to the Director-General to “determine at any time to issue an intermediate public health alert” for any reason whatsoever.

Article 12: Determination of a public health emergency of international concern, public health emergency of regional concern, or intermediate health alert

2. New para 6: Where an event has not been determined to meet the criteria for a public health emergency of international concern but the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response, the Director-General, on the basis of information received, may determine at any time to issue an intermediate public health alert to States Parties and may consult the Emergency Committee in a manner consistent with the procedure set out in Article 49.

Again, the vagueness of this proposed amendment is unsuitable for inclusion in any international law.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


33. Potential Emergencies (Article 12 - page 64)

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Article 12 because it would essentially give authority to the Director-General to make legally-binding recommendations to member nations even if an event merely has the “potential to become PHEIC.”

The use of the phrase “potential to become PHEIC” is far too vague to ever be appropriately used in international law. This would make it possible for the Director-General to declare an emergency and then make legally-binding recommendations for nearly any imaginable reason.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


34. LAB TEST INFORMATION (Article 23 - page 67)

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Article 23 because it would require “documents containing information for a lab test in digital or physical format.”

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, potentially discriminatory based on people’s unalienable right of religious freedom and clearly in violation of people’s unalienable right to travel freely upon the Earth.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


35. State Sponsored Censorship (Annex 1 - page 70)

 

I OPPOSE India’s proposed amendment to Annex 1(5g) and (7e) which advocates for the “leverage of communication channels to communicate the risk, countering misinformation and dis-information” because this amounts to state-sponsored censorship.

With the actions of the Trusted News Network and the weaponization of social media against the unalienable right of freedom of speech, it is extremely dangerous to allow the WHO to attempt to finance and legalize censorship.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Indonesia

 

36. Digital and Paper Vaccine and Prophylaxis Certificates (Article 23 - page 79, Article 31 - page 80, and Annex 6 - page 83)

 

I OPPOSE Indonesia’s proposed amendments to Articles 23, Article 31 and Annex 6, which would implement both paper and digital based “international certificate of vaccination or prophylaxis.”

While it may seem like a minor change to introduce digital based vaccine certificates, this is a stepping stone to provide access to private medical records that must be stopped before it starts.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


 

37. QR Code Based Travel Certificates (Annex 6 - page 83)

 

I OPPOSE Indonesia’s proposed amendments to Annex 6 that would implement QR code based travel certificates.

For digital format, certificates must be presented with QR code that contains the information mentioned on the Model International Certificate of Vaccinations or Prophylaxis and should be aligned with any current guidelines or/and agreed by state parties.

 

Japan

 

The proposed amendments that were submitted by Japan have not been revealed to the public.

 

 

Malaysia

 

38. Definition of Health Products (Article 1 - page 87)

 

I OPPOSE Malaysia’s proposed amendment to the definition of “health products” in Article 1.

“health products” include medicines, vaccines, medical devices, diagnostics, assistive products, cell- and gene-based therapies, and other health technologies, but not limited to this course.

It is the height of arrogance to declare that “health products” do NOT include vitamins, minerals, herbs and an enormous range of natural therapies that have improved health and saved lives for centuries. This exposes the clear nature of the proposed amendments as a thinly veiled promotional marketing campaign for the Pharmaceutical Hospital Emergency Industrial Complex exposing it as the fake (PHEIC) that it truly is.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


39. LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Articles 5 - pages 89-90 and Article 13A - page 97)

 

I OPPOSE Malaysia’s proposed amendments to Article 5 and New Article 13A that would force Developed State Parties to surrender their sovereignty.

1. Developed State Parties and WHO shall offer assistance to developing State Parties depending on the availability of finance, technology and know-how for the full implementation of this article, in pursuance of the Article 44. (page 89)

3. Developed State Parties… shall assist any State Parties, upon request, to develop, strengthen and maintain the capacities referred to in paragraph 1 of this Article. (page 90)

4. It is obligatory for the State Parties to cooperate with each other and WHO to ensure timely availability and affordability of required health products, for the effective response to PHEIC. (page 97)

In addition to the fact that the terms “developed State Parties” and “developing State Parties” are not defined, this blatant attempt to transfer wealth from one sovereign nation to another violates the basic fundamental rule of contracts which requires that something of value must be exchanged in both directions. Obligating one party to help another is actually a form of slavery.

These proposed amendments are absolutely unacceptable.


40. ALLOCATION MECHANISM (Article 15 and 16 - pages 98-99)

 

I OPPOSE Malaysia’s proposed amendments to Articles 15 and 16 that would give the WHO the power to create an “allocation mechanism” to control the distribution of “health products.”

Article 15 Temporary Recommendations

2. Temporary recommendations may include… recommendations on the access and availability of health products, technologies, and know-how, including an allocation mechanism for their fair and equitable access.

Article 16 Standing Recommendations

WHO may make standing… recommendations on the access and availability of health products, technologies, and know how, including an allocation mechanism for their fair and equitable access.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


41. MASSIVE LOSS OF SOVEREIGNTY (Article 42 - page 99)

 

I OPPOSE Indonesia’s proposed amendments to Article 42 which would change the entire nature of the World Health Organization by demanding the implementation of recommendations. Recommendations MUST remain voluntary and non-binding.

Health measures taken pursuant to these Regulations, including the recommendations made under Article 15 and 16, shall be initiated and completed without delay by all State Parties.

This is one of, if not the worst, proposed amendments. Changing the nature of temporary and standing recommendations from a non-binding recommendation to a legally-binding obligation is a direct assault on the sovereignty of all member nations.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Namibia

 

“Namibia is of the view that nothing is agreed until everything is agreed.” (page 142)

 

I AGREE that nothing will ever be agreed because I disagree with nearly all of this.

 

 

New Zealand

 

New Zealand did NOT submit any proposed amendments.

New Zealand did voice support for the amendments proposed by the United States to Articles 5, 6, 11, 12 and 49.

New Zealand did NOT voice support for the amendments proposed by the United States to Articles 9, 10, 13, 15, 18, 48 and 53.

 

Republic of Korea

 

42. INTERMEDIATE HEALTH ALERTS AND PHERC (Article 12 New 6 - page 160)

 

I OPPOSE the Republic of Korea’s proposal to declare intermediate health alerts and/or enable Regional Directors to declare Public Health Emergencies of Regional Concern (PHERC).

Article 12 Determination of a public health emergency of international concern, public health emergency of regional concern, or intermediate health alert

New 6. Where an event has not been determined to meet the criteria for a public health emergency of international concern but the Director-General has determined it requires heightened international awareness and a potential international public health response, the Director-General, on the basis of information received, may determine at any time to issue an intermediate public health alert to States Parties and may consult the Emergency Committee in a manner consistent with the procedure set out in Article 49. New 7. A Regional Director may determine that an event constitutes a public health emergency of regional concern or issue an intermediate health alert and implement related measures to provide advice and support for capacity-building to States Parties in the region either before or after notification of the event.

-page 160

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Russia

 

On behalf of the Member States of the Eurasian Economic Union (EAEU)

 

Armenia, Belarus, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan and Russia

43. NATIONAL IHR FOCAL POINT (Article 4 New 1 bis - page 165)

 

I OPPOSE Russia’s proposed amendment to Article 4 New (1bis) which would require authority to be given to an unelected person heading up the National IHR Focal Point.

NEW (1bis), States Parties shall enact or adapt their legislation to provide National IHR Focal Points with the authority and resources to perform their functions, clearly defining the tasks and functions of the entity with a role of National IHR Focal Point in implementing the obligations under these Regulations.

Since I oppose the surrender of any additional sovereignty, there should be no additional obligations under the International Health Regulations, so there would be no need for anyone to be given additional authority to head up the “National IHR Focal Point.”

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


44. POTENTIAL FOR HEALTH EMERGENCY (Article 12 - page 167)

 

I OPPOSE Russia’s proposed amendment to Article 12 which would empower the Director-General to declare that an event has “the potential to develop into a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).”

New (6.) The Director-General, if the event is not designated as a public health emergency of international concern, based on the opinion/advice of the Emergency Committee, may designate the event as having the potential to develop into a public health emergency of international concern, communicate this and the recommended measures to the States Parties in accordance with the procedure set out in Article 49.

The near constant fear-mongering that is a result of the “declaration” of emergencies does not need to be increased.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


45. TRAVEL RESTRICTIONS (Article 23 - Page 169)

 

I OPPOSE Russia’s proposed amendment to Article 23 because requiring “laboratory testing for pathogens” has NOT been shown to slow the spread of disease.

1. Subject to applicable international agreements and relevant articles of these Regulations, a State Party may require for public health purposes, on arrival or departure: documents containing information on a laboratory test for a pathogen and/or information on vaccination against a disease, including those provided at the request of the State Party in digital/ electronic form;

“Laboratory testing for pathogens” has been shown to be a fraudulent means to diagnose disease. Such “testing” does not slow the spread of disease, but it does violate the fundamental human rights of people.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


46. CENSORSHIP (Article 44(1h) - page 169-170)

 

I OPPOSE Russia’s proposed amendment to Article 44(1h) which seeks to implement state-sponsored censorship.

Article 44 Collaboration and assistance

1. States Parties shall undertake to collaborate with each other, to the extent possible…

(h) (New) in countering the dissemination of false and unreliable information about public health events, preventive and anti-epidemic measures and activities in the media, social networks and other ways of disseminating such information.

With the actions of the Trusted News Network and the weaponization of social media against the unalienable right of freedom of speech, it is extremely dangerous to allow the WHO to attempt to finance and legalize censorship.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.


47. VIOLATION OF PRIVACY (Article 44(2d) - page 171)

 

I OPPOSE Russia’s proposed amendment to Article 44(2d) which seeks to implement a digital global health information privacy violation system.

Article 44 Collaboration and assistance

2. WHO shall collaborate with States Parties, upon request, to the extent possible…

(d) (New) application of digital technologies to improve and upgrading communications for health emergency preparedness and response, including through the development of an interoperability mechanism for secure global digital exchange of health information.

-page 171

This proposed amendment would be a clear violation of people’s unalienable right to privacy, specifically regarding health information.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

Switzerland

 

48. NATIONAL COMPETENT AUTHORITY (Article 4 - page 175)

 

I OPPOSE Switzerland’s proposed amendment to Article 4 which risks giving undue authority to an unelected “National Competent Authority.”

Article 4 Responsible authorities :

1bis. In addition, each State Party should inform WHO about the establishment of its National Competent Authority responsible for overall implementation of the IHR that will be recognized and held accountable for the NFP’s functionality and the delivery of other IHR obligations.

This proposed amendment is absolutely unacceptable.

 

United States

 

The United States has re-submitted 12 of the 13 very same amendments that they submitted in 2022. This is not my first rodeo. We kicked these amendments to the curb last year, and we will kick them to the curb again this year, and every year in the future. Please read the article that started me on this journey…

 

 

Uruguay

 

On behalf of the Member States of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR)

 

Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay and Uruguay

49. VACCINE CERTIFICATES (ANNEX 6 - page 196)

 

ANNEX 6
VACCINATION, PROPHYLAXIS AND RELATED CERTIFICATES

Proposed draft: (1)

When a public health emergency of international concern has been declared, for the purposes of entry and exit of international travellers in a scenario of voluntary vaccination using products still at the research phase or subject to very limited availability, vaccination certificates should be considered approved in accordance with the normative framework of the country of origin, including with reference to the model/format of certification and the vaccination schedule (type of vaccine and schedule).

Conditions for digital documents:

Paper certificates must be assigned by the clinician indicating the administration of the vaccine or other prophylaxis, or by another duly authorized health professional. Digital certificates must incorporate a means to verify authenticity from an official web site, for example a QR code. (2)

(1) Rationale: Necessary relaxation of emergency regime, the need to consider certification of vaccines approved in accordance with the normative framework of the country of origin in scenarios of voluntary vaccination using WHO-approved products in the research phase or products subject to very limited worldwide distribution, in WHO- declared IPHE settings, for international travel purposes.

(2) Vaccination certificates for entry to and exit from national territory: Two scenarios for the data to be included on certificates:

Minimum scenario:
Presentation of certificate/proof in paper format.
Irrespective of the format, the following data should be present:

1. First name(s) and family name
2. No. of national identity document/passport
3. Type of vaccine: for example yellow fever, poliomyelitis, measles 4. Vaccine batch no. (optional, if available)
5. Date of administration
6. Place of administration (vaccinator)
7. Official stamp (or of the health professional or institution)

Maximum scenario:
Certification of vaccination history via QR code

1. Vaccination history is accredited in digital or paper format, via QR code
2. QR code directs to the official site of the country of origin to retrieve the vaccination information.


50. VACCINE CERTIFICATES (ANNEX 6 - page 197)

 

ANNEX 6
VACCINATION, PROPHYLAXIS AND RELATED CERTIFICATES

MODEL INTERNATIONAL CERTIFICATE OF VACCINATION OR PROPHYLAXIS

Proposed amendment to this section:

“To verify authenticity, scan on the official web site, the QR code or other verification method. Image of the QR code”

 

SOURCES:

the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations:

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_7-en.pdf

https://apps.who.int/gb/wgihr/pdf_files/wgihr2/A_WGIHR2_6-en.pdf

I DEMAND you do not adopt any of the proposed IHR amendments.  In particular, if you dare adopt any proposed amendments that usher in vaccine passports, police misinformation or attempt to make mRNA gene therapy into a "health product" there will be no choice but to use legal action to prevent the adoption of the wrongful acts, that if adopted, would violate jus cogens norms owed erga omnes.

Respectfully,

 
 

Updates

More updates...
Interest of Justice
Interest of Justice
Started this petition 12 months ago

13,005 comments on “Stop International Health Regulations (IHR) Amendments!”

  • James Roguski
    James Roguski

    The proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations are an absolute abomination. Why in the world would anyone want to give more power, authority and money to the WHO when they failed so miserably over the past 3 years and long before that. The WHO should be abolished. http://StopTheAmendments.com

  • Kristina Robinson
    Kristina Robinson

    This is unacceptable and will not be tolerated. We will never comply to this global takeover by genocidal elites. Stop this immediately!

  • Jason Leimer
    Jason Leimer

    I am standing up for individual liberty

  • Ellen Stromswold
    Ellen Stromswold

    The WHO wants a huge amount of our tax payer money and way more power so that they can globally dictate their will upon us all. They want to take away each person’s sovereignty over their own body and health decisions as well as take away each country’s sovereignty as well as all of the rights these countries currently give us.

  • Joanna Weber
    Joanna Weber

    There are many reasons. Here a a few: There is NO full respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons The treaty/regulations are an authoritarian overreach of the document There is a conflict of interest and corruption. A false model of health. Delegates are unelected, unaccountable, and unknown to the people they purport to represent and out-of-touch with the needs and desires of the people of their respective nations.

  • Amy Harlib
    Amy Harlib

    The WHO is a corrupted front for an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth! How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY! RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED ‘SMART’ PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY! Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos – ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al. There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse – THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of ‘useless eaters’ and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine! APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW! MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN! NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY! TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW ‘SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS’ FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE. NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL! NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK. https://wrenchinthegears.com http://www.wrongkindofgreen.org/2020/10/14/klaus-schwab-and-his-great-fascist-reset-an-overview/ https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com https://pandemicfacts.info https://wearehumanwearefree.org/7-days-campaign/ https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/covid-19-roadmap-12-step-plan-to-create-a-totalitarian-new-world-order-were-on-number-8-headed-towards-number-9/ https://questioningcovid.com https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/ http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.html https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/ Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire https://www.technocracy.news Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io http://www.nojabforme.info https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213

  • Mouna Ibrahim
    Mouna Ibrahim

    A bunch of corrupt unelected bureaucrats are not going to have any say in how I live my life.

  • Annie Elias
    Annie Elias

    I value each and every human life. Every person on this planet deserves to be treated with dignity and respect. These IHR do not support the unalienable rights of individuals, states, or countries. I support severing ties with the corrupt and contemptable WHO.

  • Javin Sanders
    Javin Sanders

    It is a power grab. Just reading article 3 makes me sick, and there is a giant text wall beyond that. What else is hidden in there

  • Heather Hankins
    Heather Hankins

    I will not relinquish my God-given rights, especially to NGO I didn’t even vote for!

  • C. Decker
    C. Decker

    Its my life not yours! Its my body not yours! You will not take charge of me or touch or control me! i am a man with natural rights born of God. No unelected bureaucrat will have any say in how i live my life.

  • Anita McMurtrey
    Anita McMurtrey

    We the people of the world do not recognize the World Health Organization as anything other than an advisory body, with no power whatsoever to enforce the recommendations that they make. In all matters, we the people make up the whole-of-society and we are the masters of the whole-of-government. We claim our right to personal, individual sovereignty in all matters, and cede that authority only to God, our creator. We the people of the world are responsible for our own health, and we are NOT ANSWERABLE TO THE WHO.

  • Lee Ann Vieck
    Lee Ann Vieck

    I am a free person of the UNITED STATES of AMERICA! No one shall infringe on my rights to decide my own health and freedom choices!

  • Brenda Andersen
    Brenda Andersen

    I believe The New Proposed International Health Regulations to be in appropriate.

  • Joan Simmons
    Joan Simmons

    I am calling on our president and other elected officials to honer their oath to defend the constitution ..stop THE treaty and leave the WHO president Biden and you have taken a oath to protect the constitution .. by approving this treaty he an you will be guilty of braking that oath.. this looks like treason to me.. you will be destroying the constitution and enabling tyranny by a non- elected non- American body the WHO.. destroying the freedoms of not only Americans but of the worlds population,, Dear Representative, I am calling on you to stop the Biden Administration’s IHR Amendment from being signed and delivered to the WHO in Geneva and Exit the WHO altogether! The Biden Administration’s amendment empowers the WHO Director-General to regulate and enforce United States Public Health Policy, including, but not limited to, the prevention and management of global pandemics. It’s time to exit the WHO and the IHR International Health Regulations Agreement! The Administration does not have the authority to suspend our civil liberties and constitutional protections in the name of global cooperation. The United States must govern the affairs of its citizenry within the strict framework of the US Constitution and Bill of Rights, under the consent of the governed, and I do not consent! https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA75/A75_18-en.pdf VOTE YES ON HR 419 No Taxpayer Funding for the World Health Organization Act! Thank you.

  • Michelle Paul
    Michelle Paul

    I believe in personal freedom

  • Su A
    Su A

    We didn’t elect these people. We certainly will NOT allow them to violate our Rights.

  • Greg Eldefonso
    Greg Eldefonso

    I Am One With God

  • Anne - Marie Boland
    Anne - Marie Boland

    I am signing because this has nothing to do with health and is about control. I do not consent to these amendments and I do not acknowledge the IHR and I declare myself independent of them.

  • Jacobus Gouws
    Jacobus Gouws

    Stop the proposed amendments to the IHR and bring the WHO to justice.

  • Cathy Bretfeld
    Cathy Bretfeld

    I want the corruption and crimes against humanity to end.

  • Loretta Marmor
    Loretta Marmor

    I am signing to stop the WHO from using health or weather geo-engineering as an excuse to supercede nation’s constitutions.

  • Darrin Cutright
    Darrin Cutright

    I’m against, communism, and the stealing of our Nations Sovereignty.

  • Karstein Bjastad
    Karstein Bjastad

    More transparency, rigour and accountability needed, together with maintenance of national sovereignty.

  • Mary-Elizabeth Vent
    Mary-Elizabeth Vent

    COVID is being used an excuse for an unprecedented power grab and leading to a one world government. For most people, it is a mild virus. For many others, if they had been treated properly; they would have not have had an issue. The death rate was less than one percent. Does that even meet the definition of a “pandemic”? Sounds more like a scamdemic to me.

  • Racheal Clay
    Racheal Clay

    We deserve justice

  • Manal Guirguis
    Manal Guirguis

    No More unlawful acts against the people

  • Danielle Greer
    Danielle Greer

    I want justice for all those who have been harmed.

  • Danielle Greer
    Danielle Greer

    The Lord God Almighty is going to destroy these People and the evil government that want us all dead. FEMA is a weapon against We The People Of The United States of America. They turned them in to a army against The People Of America.

  • Judith Martinez
    Judith Martinez

    I am signing because each country should set their own rules and regulations. The amendments in the US must be authorized by the peoples’ representatives-US Congress

  • Micheall Campbell
    Micheall Campbell

    i am signing because, Everything from nov11th2019 I have become HopelesslyHomelessness & the System of the W.H.O. & All Associated & Affiliates are guilty by Association! & All Trust for All Authority’s EveryWhere, All Families of my own as Well Every Human Being on the Planet’s Families that have been Forced to get MURDERED by the Very Governments Authority’s of the their Countries Which are to Care for All Their Citizens, my Sisters & Brothers in the ‘HUMAN-RACE !’ From TURTLE iSLAND i STAND4FREEDOM&TRUTH LiFEorDEATH ! This is no Threat! it is my HEART, SOUL, SPiRiT, BODY, MiND, ESSENCE, ALL i HAVE & i have Not a Problem, if no Truth, no Freedom, there is only one way i see for me & i myself, is Not Move STAND4FREEDOM&TRUTH & i will not be any otherwise, give up! You have the wrong person! i STAND DiE ON MY FEET!!!! ‘“TAHLTAH-iNDiAN!”’

  • A Beneville
    A Beneville

    The proposed amendments to the IHR text is much worse than before and serves no benefit.

  • KELLI ROBERTS
    KELLI ROBERTS

    Even my legal fiction (name in all caps) works in my own best interest. The WHO is a criminal organization and any attempt to alter, edit or modify the originally agreed upon document without my consent, fenders said contract null and void. Hello, My Name is Human!

  • Beth Mouser
    Beth Mouser

    I want to have the right to treat illness in the safest way I determine based on my choice of doctor and medical treatment.

  • Mouna Ibrahim
    Mouna Ibrahim

    The WHO is a corrupt unelected organisation headed by a terrorist that is Tedros and cowers and obeys psycho Bill Gates’ orders. They have no business or qualifications in health matters and they have no business in our lives. Bill Gates, Rockefellers, Rothschilds, Soros, Harari, Fauci, Ted Turner, Obamas, Clintons, Tedros, Kissinger and all the rest of the evil globalists should have already by now be in wooden boxes in the ground for crimes against humanity and deliberately creating this disease to commit deliberate mass genocide but they buy the corrupt judges. Their money doesn’t entitle them to do anything that impacts the population. Do not give them power by complying.

  • Zarayna Pradyer
    Zarayna Pradyer

    The proposed amendments offend my politics, science, and religion.

  • Vladimir Nikolić
    Vladimir Nikolić

    Wir brauchen WHO nicht mehr!

  • Pamela Martin
    Pamela Martin

    The WHO is making poor, unscientific, illogical decisions on my behalf and that is criminal.

  • Fiona Mcleod
    Fiona Mcleod

    The damage to the human race being done by these evil people must STOP.

  • Sue Dekany
    Sue Dekany

    I am more than capable of making my own decisions and helping my friends and family. I have no need of a nanny state!

  • Kim Marais
    Kim Marais

    I do not agree with any of their proposed amendments nor with the WHO dictating our health policies any longer.

  • Michael Mottram
    Michael Mottram

    To help bring this madness and evil to an end.

  • Janet Simpson
    Janet Simpson

    This is being done without the consent of the populations it affects. No body, especially when unelected, has the right to ‘delete’ our fundamental human rights.

  • Roger Longo
    Roger Longo

    All Covid shots must stop now. Prosecute the drug companies CEO’s, Fauci,Gates, CDC, FDA, NIH etc.

  • Roberrt Banner
    Roberrt Banner

    This is not what the WHO and IHR is supposed to be doing!

  • John Thorpe
    John Thorpe

    I am not a number,I am a free man!

  • Effat Yousuf Aggie.yousuf@gmail.com
    Effat Yousuf Aggie.yousuf@gmail.com

    The WHO did not provide any scientific advice that benefited my country Canada, it only contributed to misinformation and disinformation. Wast of our hard earned tax dollars to support such an organization, especially when they are unelected by Canadians!

  • Meredith Klitzke
    Meredith Klitzke

    The WHO cannot be trusted!!!

  • Johane Joy
    Johane Joy

    I am sighing because I want to stop IHR amendments which not only are done illegally, against any moral compounds yet are in breach of the fundamental human rights

  • Ann Robinson
    Ann Robinson

    They are stripping us of our dignity and human rights and they have no right to be in charge of our ‘health’.

  • Barbara Hanson
    Barbara Hanson

    The tyrants must stand down. Humanity does not consent to their tyranny.

  • David Stewart
    David Stewart

    They are crossing a line that should not be crossed.we need human dignity to stay. These tyrants need strung up and new responsible people put in who have more sympathy and compassion for humanity

  • Peggy Fitzpatrick
    Peggy Fitzpatrick

    We cannot allow this to happen!

  • Ina Gabler
    Ina Gabler

    The WHO seeks to become a tyrannical global government and use vaccines and medications as instruments of control. Mr. Tedros is appointed, not elected, and has no medical training. He’s blatantly unqualified to be the world ruler he wants to be, doing the bidding of those with power behind him.

  • Joan Newton
    Joan Newton

    It is vitally important that our fundamental freedoms and human rights are respected and retained.

  • Ray Bouvy
    Ray Bouvy

    I want individual right to my health decisions in the future.

  • marilyn daniels
    marilyn daniels

    Do not want global health decisions made by unelected officials.

  • Athena Bongard
    Athena Bongard

    My body is sovereign. I did not vote to elect the WHO, and as a US citizen I demand that this group of individuals STOP trying to control me and my body choices.

  • Joseph O’Leary
    Joseph O’Leary

    I want God given human dignity and freedoms and rights to be preserved.

  • Jerry Grev
    Jerry Grev

    want nothing to do with WHO

  • Anthony Castillo
    Anthony Castillo

    I am signing because the WHO is ran like a dictatorship that puts financial and one world government interest first.

  • Jason Cratty
    Jason Cratty

    These people have no right to dictate. They are unelected and who do they think they are? They rule no body! Demons!

  • George Pledger
    George Pledger

    Sovereignty for every nation

  • Nina Lathe
    Nina Lathe

    WHO is a corupted organization full of unelected corupted evil persons and corporations who are acting against all the countries constitutions and laws. All their secret and open actions created huge damages to the world measured in people’s lives and rights. WHO is nothing about health, everyone on this planet knows this and did nothing good, is just a tool of some people who are paying for the distruction of the world, of the entire humanity and civilization. A treaty between impostors, liers and criminals is not a treaty, is conspiracy, a crime organization, a trying for abusing of the power they do not have.

  • Rebecca H
    Rebecca H

    Im signing because the US is a constitutional republic and we don’t need global elites dictating our health policies.

  • Janice
    Janice

    Humanity needs to take all of its rights back. NOW.

  • Angie Stone
    Angie Stone

    I want a better world for my granddaughters, not this tyranny.

  • Debbie Grace
    Debbie Grace

    No one in the world should have such power over personal decisions!!

  • Robert Dotson, MD
    Robert Dotson, MD

    Stop the secret meetings and the war on Humanity that WHO and the Western governments have been engaged in!!!!!

  • Evelyn Bale
    Evelyn Bale

    It is wrong! We still have rights and Freedom!

  • sandra moran
    sandra moran

    We the people are the power, not the self-appointed, crimes against humanity tyrants!

  • Geraldine May
    Geraldine May

    The WHO is an unelected, private body. I have given them no power to decide anything having to do with my health.

  • Theresa Noullet
    Theresa Noullet

    I do not want some agency in which we have no input making laws for the U.S. and other countries and removing all of out sovereignty and freedom of choice. s. and other

  • Shirley Hodge
    Shirley Hodge

    STOP IHR AMENDMENTS

  • david werenka
    david werenka

    the who is not acting in the interests of people or health.

  • Matthew Grace
    Matthew Grace

    I’ve seen my mother significantly injured by the covid jabs, I’ve seen my cousin have multiple strokes in his early 40’s, and has numerous people I knew in good health have significant injuries or die in their 30’s and 40’s after taking the shot. I know zero healthy people who died from covid.

  • Ruth Soriano
    Ruth Soriano

    I want a better world for my kids and grandkids, not a tyranny

  • Jeannine Schulz
    Jeannine Schulz

    I am a sovereign being who is entitled to dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. I decide what is right for my body.

  • Robert Schulz
    Robert Schulz

    I am a sovereign being who is entitled to dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. I decide what is right for my body.

  • Adamant King
    Adamant King

    I am supporting human rights

  • Philip Crangle
    Philip Crangle

    I want an end to this new world order healthcare tyranny

  • Robert Denomme
    Robert Denomme

    I am signing because I want my children and grand children and future generations to enjoy the freedom that I had without compromise. The W.H.O. is an evil organization.

  • Roland Sauve
    Roland Sauve

    We need to rid ourselves of the WHO immediately due to their stupidity in reguards to our health act

  • Margarita Reygan
    Margarita Reygan

    I am signing because this is the most important action at present times to preserve the freedom for the whole humanity. Many thanks for your tireless efforts. We will win!

  • Marianne Bollinger
    Marianne Bollinger

    I do not agree with those rules, My body My choice!

  • Geoff Fisk
    Geoff Fisk

    I wish to halt the WHO attempts to monopolise global health policies.

  • Ruth Borup
    Ruth Borup

    WHO er et korrupt og forbryderisk foretagende. Vi er alle født frie og det vedbliver vi at være. Ud af WHO…

  • Raymond Anthony
    Raymond Anthony

    I do not support the WHO o the UN and it’s communist agenda!

  • Barry Merchant
    Barry Merchant

    I didn’t vote for you and you don’t represent me. I do not consent to you having any control over health care in my country and my health in particular.

  • Darryl Turner
    Darryl Turner

    We are doing just fine ourselves as a people and don’t need any outside input. No need for anything, but our god given right to make our own destiny.

  • Mark Helling
    Mark Helling

    It’s a thing called ‘sovereignty’ … and keeping it!

  • Jacqueline Steffen
    Jacqueline Steffen

    I am signing because the Amendments must be stopped! The WHO does not have authority over countries to dictate health regulations! I demand our human rights be respected in all forms!

  • Fred- Paget
    Fred- Paget

    To Hell with these bandits.. Death to all tyrants!

  • Almut Tolkien
    Almut Tolkien

    transparency is a must. I am sovereign.

  • Melanie Ross
    Melanie Ross

    I do not believe my human rights should be in the hands of a global company that I have no way of selecting or then voting on issues. I do not support a treaty that is done in secrecy and manipulation or bribery for countries to sign. Holding a barrel over someone’s head, can only mean one thing – corruption.

  • Dan Kromer
    Dan Kromer

    Globalists are worthless pieces of shit. Try them and execute them. Period.

  • Charlotte Brock
    Charlotte Brock

    I want science in our health systems instead of ideologies practiced with bias.

  • Cassandra Auerbach
    Cassandra Auerbach

    I support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

  • Anne Mason
    Anne Mason

    I care about human rights and I must resist as the WHO attempts to steal our humanity!

  • Keith Perry
    Keith Perry

    The W H O have no mandate from anyone in the world to act without the consent of the worlds population.

  • Jacqueline Pagnanelli
    Jacqueline Pagnanelli

    I support the Constitutional Republic where citizens have individual health freedom versus global dictatorship!

  • Rachel Tope
    Rachel Tope

    I want to be able to make personal health decisions and not have my personal health rights be controlled and dictated by anyone else.

  • Janet Rhead
    Janet Rhead

    I do not consent to an NGO comprised of international unelected beaurocrats dictating what medical procedures I have.

  • Nancy Cohn
    Nancy Cohn

    We will not succumb to global control of our bodies and minds

  • Darcy Bell
    Darcy Bell

    I’m a human being, God damn it. My life has value. I’m as mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.

  • Kelly Carlson
    Kelly Carlson

    As a human being, I demand full respect, dignity, human rights, and fundamental freedoms of persons to be honored, not disregarded as the WHO is attempting to do . The WHO is a disgrace by attempting to ignore this.

  • ilana eberson
    ilana eberson

    It is our human right that our health is in our hands and we get to decide what happens to our own bodies. We can’t have random unelected officials and evil morons deciding what we can and can’t do with our own bodies.

  • Marilyn Hogan
    Marilyn Hogan

    I want to leave a better place for my Grandchildren

  • Angelena Cook
    Angelena Cook

    I am signing because I was born free, have lived free for 80 yrs and I fully intend to die free no matter how that happens.

  • Barbara Harris
    Barbara Harris

    Human rights I do not support the WHO having control over world health

  • kent stadler
    kent stadler

    NAZIS

  • Cheryl Little
    Cheryl Little

    The WHO has to legal right to dictate anything to any sovereign nation. Time to put it back in its place as an advisor group and nothing more!

  • Laura Schepis
    Laura Schepis

    I am not willing to give up my medical or personal sovereignty as a free American to an international organization who has a God complex.

  • Padmanaban Subramanian
    Padmanaban Subramanian

    Enough is enough. No more interference on individual health choices by WHO.

  • ILONA RAGAUSKIENE
    ILONA RAGAUSKIENE

    I am against all kind of dictatorships, medicinal, digital. I say no to all their bullshit.

  • Shoshi Herscu
    Shoshi Herscu

    These crimes against humanity must be stopped now!

  • Kathy Daly
    Kathy Daly

    My health is not going to be subjected to untested vaccination.

  • Cody Coons
    Cody Coons

    I am tired of the health fear tactics and my liberty not being respected in these amendments.

  • Laura Marian
    Laura Marian

    WHO has no right to decide upon my body. That’s only mine, and is God created, He created a perfect body and I don’t give a shit about these amendments and the nation states who proposed them

  • Hadewych Verschueren
    Hadewych Verschueren

    As long as members of the WHO has his fingers in the production of vaccinations and geoengineering, that long we know these new proposed Pandemic Treaties are a horrific crime against us all! STOP THE AMENDMENTS!

  • Simon Whyld
    Simon Whyld

    The WHOs pandemic treaty is a threat to democracy and freedom

  • Steve Weis
    Steve Weis

    I strongly believe in the human rights that are being threatened by these changes to the International Health Regulations and strongly oppose the WHO dictating standard terms to all countries without their agreement.

  • Christine Cahalin
    Christine Cahalin

    I do not submit to the undemocratic rules of the WHO and I want it disbanded. I believe in the freedom of the individual, in bodily autonomy and the wisdom of local and diverse responses to health conditions and emergencies. There can never be a single, global, response to diverse nations.

  • Giorgio Gourlas
    Giorgio Gourlas

    Our sovereignty is not negotiable. Forever Free.

  • Maria Nielsen
    Maria Nielsen

    I care!!!

  • Connee Burton
    Connee Burton

    I bow only to God Almighty!

  • John Hunt
    John Hunt

    We the people need to have our rights protected

  • Sara French
    Sara French

    I demand that the well-defined verbiage to protect human rights remain in-tact.

  • Philippa Daley
    Philippa Daley

    The WHO are corrupt and without humanity. An unelected body should NOT have any say over our health and well-being it goes against everything a sovereign or Republic democratic nation stands for.

  • Jan Kwikkel
    Jan Kwikkel

    I am signing because… ” to officially protest the IHR Amendments being negotiated this week that removes dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms. Sign NOW! Its more important than most people realize.”

  • Jill Everett
    Jill Everett

    Enough is enough! We are free people and will defend our freedoms.

  • Mouna Ibrahim
    Mouna Ibrahim

    This unelected body of evil, narcissistic, sociopathic, psychotic animals need to get out of our lives for good. Do not obey Satan’s followers and do not give them the power over you.

  • Laura Sholtz
    Laura Sholtz

    The WHO has become a travesty! It does not stand up for health, for the people, for protecting anyone; instead the WHO is baldly focussing on harm, on genocide.

  • Marcy Nathan
    Marcy Nathan

    This amendment is the OPPOSITE of freedom, of individual rights.. This amendment is frightening! One organization, one country should NOT be able to dictate these issues which are individual HUMAN RIGHTS !

  • EUGENIO JR GALLARDO SANTIAGO
    EUGENIO JR GALLARDO SANTIAGO

    curtailing inherent human rights as advocated by the original U.N. is anathema!

  • George Fyall
    George Fyall

    To stop this tyranny.

  • Heather Mc|Gowan
    Heather Mc|Gowan

    WHO is not elected body and should have no right to govern anyone

  • Darren Greenhalgh
    Darren Greenhalgh

    This has nothing to do with ‘world health” and needs to be stopped!

  • Barbara Gladders
    Barbara Gladders

    The US should not be ceding its authority to the WHO for implementing health policy, nor should those policies ignore or deny the rights of the individual. Our bodily autonomy and the right to make our own health decisions free from coercion or manipulation is essential to preserving our civil liberties; we must not let any global body interfere with that.

  • John Oude Egberink
    John Oude Egberink

    I don’t like

  • Jytte Carola Leather
    Jytte Carola Leather

    the WHO are trying to take away our human rights to decide what medication goes into our bodies. Our freedoms are being eroded and it has to stop.

  • William Gruber
    William Gruber

    Each country and person should have sovereignty over their medical rights and not non-elected bureaucrats whose funding comes the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

  • Leigh Stewart
    Leigh Stewart

    I am signing because their crimes against humanity must be stopped. Their intention is pure evil. They have far too much power.

  • Patrick Allan
    Patrick Allan

    The WHO and their backers like gates, Trudeau, Biden, and many more are activitely trying to destroy our culture and way of life. Through their vaxx policies they make a lot of money at our expense and kill us off.

  • Adele Barnabe
    Adele Barnabe

    I am a normal human being who cares about this earth

  • Marcia Troyer
    Marcia Troyer

    I believe in the sovereignty of nations and the freedom and dignity of human beings made in the image of God.

  • Michelle
    Michelle

    We need to fight to the end for our God given freedoms and rights.

  • Juha
    Juha

    Haluan olla vapaa!

  • Beth Trewin
    Beth Trewin

    Humanity must be free

  • Audrey Famette
    Audrey Famette

    Everyone has the god given right to choose what medical procedure should or should not be given to them. No organization should be allowed to dictate a medical procedure for anyone, in any country.

  • Rebecca Kahn
    Rebecca Kahn

    HHS The proposed changes to the first principle in Article 3 of the International Health Regulations is in stark opposition to the jus cogens peremptory norms of international human rights law. If adopted, they would unreasonably strike out the following well defined legally significant text: “with the full respect for the dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms of persons” The verbiage used in treaties to protect human rights would be removed, allowing for the violation of Siracusa Principles and other limits of power. Furthermore, the new text would exchange well defined legally significant human rights verbiage that is enforceable for people to protect their rights and replace these protections with undefined words that are void for vagueness and exchanging the superior human rights laws and verbiage for these terms could recklessly and needlessly lead to a situation of ambiguity that could strip the people of standard human rights protections. The proposed amendments to the IHR text is much worse than before and serves no benefit. Respectfully,

  • Marie Clodge
    Marie Clodge

    I do not recognize the corrupt WHO organization or any government who supports them. They are engineering these plandemics to depopulate the world with the aid of billions from B & M Gates Foundation, who are known eugenisists (In his own TED Talk some years ago, Gates admitted reducing populations with vaccines (which are really bioweapons as you well know). I will not participate and I am a SOVEREIGN individual. Without prejudice and recourse marie free woman of clodge family

  • Robert Du Broy
    Robert Du Broy

    Fundamental freedoms and rights must be respected. Any wording short of that invites tyranny.

  • Rachel Robertson
    Rachel Robertson

    I am signing because the dignity and human rights of each individual need to be upheld to maintain fundamental freedoms

  • Timothy Turner
    Timothy Turner

    Tired of them trying to rule the world.they need to go.

  • Debra Curry
    Debra Curry

    I want only officials I elect to have a say… not WHO or WEF or UN or any other body but my elected government. Stay out of my country!

  • Shelly M
    Shelly M

    Their actions are driven by the dark side!!👿

  • Linda Frederick
    Linda Frederick

    I am a nurse & sick of ALL governments who went against the science.

  • Marilyn Otton
    Marilyn Otton

    These changes are intended to remove the protection of human rights. This is lunacy – unless your intention is …?

  • Jason Kuntz
    Jason Kuntz

    I am signing due to our freedoms are at stake, but a rogue organization that is acting and promoting the propaganda of fear just like the nazis did. stop these sick people.

  • Sharon Sweet
    Sharon Sweet

    I believe in freedom. I do not believe any institution or organization should ever dictate what happens to another human being, period.

  • Wayne Creeden
    Wayne Creeden

    All bull shit .

  • Carol Rivers
    Carol Rivers

    I believe in human rights and the freedom to choose

  • Ele Fraser
    Ele Fraser

    I am signing to save the sovereignty of all human beings on this planet and not be enslaved by the new world order.

  • Maureen Els
    Maureen Els

    The WHO cannot act as if they’re an elected group of people who can act and make decisions which will impact people and their lives. Who gave them that authority?

  • koppy kat
    koppy kat

    Our soverignty is not negotiable

  • Herman Waagmeester
    Herman Waagmeester

    The WHO should be stopped!

  • John Hughes
    John Hughes

    What you’re trying to do is all wrong & illegal.

  • Marco Sandi
    Marco Sandi

    Bodily autonomy is the first principle of a free human being. Without bodily autonomy one is a slave. Slavery is evil and should be condemned by the WHO.

  • Hermanus Potgieter
    Hermanus Potgieter

    I was not part of any public group that have given the WHO the right to rule.

  • Ina Goosen
    Ina Goosen

    We the people – the majority – will not stand by & watch officials misuse their office to take control of the world population for their own warped ideals.

  • Loretta Marmor
    Loretta Marmor

    I do not want to be part of thw WHO’s move to a medical dictatorship

  • Loretta Marmor
    Loretta Marmor

    I do not want to be part of the WHO’s move to a medical dictatorship

  • Gloria Norton
    Gloria Norton

    Human rights are being stolen

  • John Porter
    John Porter

    I prefer medical health freedom vs medical tyranny being used to subdue my Human Rights given me from God .

  • Guillemette Smoes
    Guillemette Smoes

    l’ OMS n’est pas démocratique

  • Jacqueline Young
    Jacqueline Young

    To support this petition to hold these clowns accountable for what they have done

  • Josh Payne
    Josh Payne

    They have been committing crimes and getting away with them far to long

  • Janice Barton
    Janice Barton

    I am signing because I totally disagree with what the WHO are planning and their total disregard for Human Rights. I agree that the proposed amendments to the International Health Regulations should definitely be scrapped!

  • Noella West
    Noella West

    Our rights are on the line!

  • Gerry Segal
    Gerry Segal

    WHO needs to be abolished. Let this be our intent.

  • Douglas Dolleman
    Douglas Dolleman

    “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms”

  • Robert Denomme
    Robert Denomme

    I believe each country should determine their own health regulations with global input for consideration

  • Frank Gonzales Jr.
    Frank Gonzales Jr.

    I support respecting dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.

  • Anne Marie Dareys
    Anne Marie Dareys

    Freedom

  • Connee Burton
    Connee Burton

    It is against God.

  • Dolores Walton
    Dolores Walton

    I am writing to say STOP The Proposed Amendments To The International Health Regulations (IHR). Refrain from future attempts to propose such regulations.

  • Carole Trombadore
    Carole Trombadore

    I am signing to protect my human rights and my Constitutional Rights.

  • Daniela Hauptmann
    Daniela Hauptmann

    I like freedom

  • Tara Stafford
    Tara Stafford

    Justice for the people is our only hope. We can do this.

  • Janet Erskine
    Janet Erskine

    I want to live in a representative democracy and not to be ruled by unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats.

  • Jacqueline Steffen
    Jacqueline Steffen

    I am signing because I fully support the Interest of Justice and their work in defending human rights. The WHO is in no way legitimate and needs to be crushed!

  • Roberta Jamieson
    Roberta Jamieson

    I am a sovereign woman with humsn rights and dignity and self determination. No one can remove these from me.

  • VICKIE fairburn
    VICKIE fairburn

    It’s none of the IHR group what people put in their body! I bet these reprobate minds aren’t taking any vaccines (gene therapy)! Evil people, used by the WEF and luciferian weasels.

  • Celeste Duvenhage
    Celeste Duvenhage

    Human Rights are God given. No human has the right to take them away.

  • Kelly Pope
    Kelly Pope

    I believe in a free world and we need to stop the insane amount of corruption all around the World. This is WWIII we are in and we need to stop them killing off humanity.

  • mike hoskin
    mike hoskin

    these people are lawless

  • ERIC BLACK
    ERIC BLACK

    we have to stop the madness

  • Jim Roberson
    Jim Roberson

    The assault on democracy world wide.

  • Carolyn Duprey
    Carolyn Duprey

    I believe in our freedom!!

  • Vincenzo R
    Vincenzo R

    I am signing because no one has the right to rule over human rights. I t is high-crime and the oppressive & suppressive group is an organized private club corporation of criminals organization and should be dealt with justice. It’s a pure blackmail act and enemy

  • John Hughes
    John Hughes

    I don’t like it.

  • Julia Jett
    Julia Jett

    We need to stop this Global “BULLSHIT!!!”

  • Liesel Briggs
    Liesel Briggs

    No means No! I do not agree with the amendments. Where is there respect for life.

  • Pasi Slonje
    Pasi Slonje

    Stopp the evil

  • Nora Buhler
    Nora Buhler

    We are a sovereign nation not controlled by who.

  • John Hunt
    John Hunt

    It’s very important to keep all human rights in tacked and UNchanged

  • Keith Burgess
    Keith Burgess

    My rights are being violated.

  • Laura Sholtz
    Laura Sholtz

    I don’t need any organization telling me what I should do with my body or ordering me around, especially as it concerns my own health. Why does the WHO think they need so much power and money anyway? Obviously they won’t do any good for anyone but themselves.

  • Teresa Temos
    Teresa Temos

    I am signing because I believe in human rights and ones only bodily autonomy.

  • Claudia Perono
    Claudia Perono

    Sono contraria a queste intrusioni sulle persone

  • Davide Sparacii
    Davide Sparacii

    Firmo perché a intrusioni sulle persone, a obblighi, sono contro la guerra e il ricatto

  • Marsha McGrath
    Marsha McGrath

    Human rights and dignity are key to our personhood and must be part of the World Health Organization. The WEF is not protective of humanity.

  • Amelia Hissong
    Amelia Hissong

    I don’t want to lose sovereignty in our nations! I don’t trust the WHO.

  • Kenda Hess
    Kenda Hess

    These IHR changes must be stopped

  • Doe Kelly
    Doe Kelly

    what the WHO is up to is egregious and unconscionable not to mention, corrupt.

  • Bryan Sullivan
    Bryan Sullivan

    Health freedom and choice is important!

  • Dorothy Norris-Elye
    Dorothy Norris-Elye

    No-one – whether in or out of public office – can legitimately arbitrarily dispose of any shared essential belonging also to others and not personally and only their own, to do with as they please. The sovereignty and democracy/citizen’s right of self-governance of each country, being entailed for posterity, belongs equally to each citizen; the rights of each person are inherent, inalienable and their own and may not be infringed upon by anyone. There can be NO excuses for human rights abuses. There never were, never will be – and ‘Never Again’!

  • Danielle McDonald
    Danielle McDonald

    This is such a violation of all our rights. There is nothing in the news about this. Americans have no idea that this is going on behind their backs.

  • Daniela Hauptmann
    Daniela Hauptmann

    I don’t want to be a WHO slave to be injected with lethal toxins at their whim. I don’t want to live in a smart city, I don’t want a chip nor electrode in my brain. I don’t want notorious psychopaths and genocidal eugenicists be in charge of my body, my life.

  • Amy Harlib
    Amy Harlib

    There is an insidious global ruling class plot to enslave all life on earth behind all the madness and suffering inflicted on We the People. How to fight back against this TOTAL SLAVERY! RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! DITCH THE DAMNED ‘SMART’ PHONES AND THE DAMNED QR CODES AND GO BACK TO LANDLINES OR FLIP PHONES AND USE CASH AS MUCH AS POSSIBLE! INSIST ON CASH! CBDC IS TOTAL SLAVERY! Other than getting rid of nuclear weapons which I support 100% the rest of the anti-nuclear peace movement and CLIMATE CRISIS propaganda is parroting UN utter GARBAGE, a complete surrender to the ENSLAVEMENT AGENDA by the diabolical despots of Davos – ruling class criminals who lust for total power and control and all of whom should be tried and jailed for life and their malign organizations dismantled: the UN, the WEF, the IMF, the WHO, the BIS, NATO, Blackrock, Vanguard, The Rockefellers, the Rothschilds, The Bilderbergers, the CFR et al. There is an evil predator globalist technocratic elite agenda of eugenics/depopulation/genocide using bioweapon poison jabs, war, geoengineering, EMF radiation, starvation and economic collapse – THE GREAT RESET/AGENDA 2030/4TH INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION to get rid of billions of ‘useless eaters’ and to use nano tech to turn the survivors into ROBOTIZED COMPLIANT SLAVES! WAKE UP AND RESIST! DO NOT COMPLY! These are psychopath megalomaniacs who want to play god by turning all life into digitized metaverse mechanistic synthetic biology to be manipulated by their AI algorithms. A more demonic sickening idea is nearly impossible to imagine! APPALLED AND HORRIFIED AT INSANE TYRANNICAL PROTOCOLS THAT HAVE NOTHING TO DO WITH HEALTH AND EVERYTHING TO DO WITH TOTALITARIAN CONTROL! REVERSE THIS NOW! MAKE THE WORLD AND AMERICA 2019 (comparatively speaking), AND FREE AGAIN! NO, I AM NOT AFRAID OF THE MORONIC SCARIANT SHMARIANT MONKEYSHINES! WAKE UP ALREADY! TOTALLY CONDEMN BIDEN AND ALL OTHER POLS WHO HAVE NO POWER TO LAWLESSLY ACT LIKE AN EMPEROR OR DICTATOR AND DECREE JAB CROW ‘SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS’ FASCIST SEGREGATION/DISCRIMINATION/APARTHEID VIOLATIONS OF THE CONSTITUTION, THE NUREMBERG CODES AND EVERY CIVIL RIGHT IMAGINABLE. NO GREEN NEW DEALS OR BUILD BACK BETTER FROM THE CRIMINAL TECHNOCRAT TYRANTS KLAUS SCHWAB AND HIS CRONIES FROM THE WORLD ECONOMIC FORUM. STOP THE TERRIBLE TYRANNY OF THE TECHNOCRATS GLOBAL AGENDA OF TOTAL SURVEILLANCE AND CONTROL USING THE VIRUS AS EXCUSE AND PROPAGANDA TOOL! NO MUZZLING STIFLING MASK MANDATES! NO FORCED VACCINES! END TORTUROUS DEVASTATING LOCK DOWNS NOW! I WANT MY LIFE BACK. https://wrenchinthegears.com https://www.stopworldcontrol.com/ https://www.thelastamericanvagabond.com https://pandemicfacts.info https://wearehumanwearefree.org/7-days-campaign/ https://sonsoflibertymedia.com/covid-19-roadmap-12-step-plan-to-create-a-totalitarian-new-world-order-were-on-number-8-headed-towards-number-9/ https://questioningcovid.com https://www.corbettreport.com/interview-1581-james-corbett-breaks-down-the-great-reset/ http://www.stopcp.com/GlobalResetPSYOP/GlobalResetPSYOPMindMap.html https://everydayconcerned.net/2020/09/04/breaking-major-investigative-report-by-association-of-french-reserve-army-officers-finds-covid-19-pandemic-to-have-a-hidden-agenda-for-global-totalitarianism-nanotech-chipping-of-all-5g-irradia/ Pam Popper: https://makeamericansfreeagain.com Del Bigtree: https://www.brighteon.com/channels/highwire https://www.technocracy.news Naomi Wolf: https://dailyclout.io http://www.nojabforme.info https://www.globalresearch.ca/we-must-awaken-from-corona-coma-reject-great-reset-robotic-technocracy-assert-common-humanity/5745213

  • Beverly Foster
    Beverly Foster

    The United States is removing itself from the UN and all its criminal “agencies”. We care nothing for the IHR or any proposed treaty, as we no longer are members of any of this psychopathic activity. Congress is proposing to defund Davos and the WHO.

  • Simon Whyld
    Simon Whyld

    The WHO pandemic treaty is a threat to global democracy and individual freedom.

  • Clara Ferguson
    Clara Ferguson

    You have no right to rule over the world and enslave the population. Only God has rights over mankind because He is our Creator and creator of our beautiful earth and does not enslave us!

  • Graciela Cardenas-Mustapha
    Graciela Cardenas-Mustapha

    STOP The amendments to Articles 18, 23, 24, 27, 28, 31, 35, 36 and 44 and Annexes 6, 7 and 8 would create unprecedented intrusion into liberty and fundamental freedoms, human rights and autonomy. The contact tracing and vaccine passport schemes interfere with privacy and dignity, therefore, adopting these unnecessary, overly burdensome, disproportunate, unreasonable and tyrannical policies is tantamount to internationally wrongful acts and under the mandate of our organization they must not be allowed.

  • R. Denice Brown-Sweeney
    R. Denice Brown-Sweeney

    The egregious travesty perpetrated globally of the Covid tyranny speaks to the incompetence of the W.H.O. and everyone associated with it.

  • Margaret Frazer
    Margaret Frazer

    I demand the right to choose what happens to my body. You have no right to demand that everyone must do as you say, ie., vaccinations, vaccination passports.

  • Brenda Duncan
    Brenda Duncan

    I am against the vaccines, vaccine passports and our personal rights and freedoms that are being taken away.

  • Dianne Johnson
    Dianne Johnson

    We need to stop the medical tyranny!

  • Michelle Kenyon
    Michelle Kenyon

    I completely disagree with the WHO and the IHR amendments. The US should remain a sovereign nation and not participate in this global tyranny.

  • Arie Merkestein
    Arie Merkestein

    Ik teken omdat ik het niet eens ben met de voorgestelde wijzigen.

  • virginia lamp
    virginia lamp

    these people are not elected to these seats of power and dont adhere to the same rules or regulations they are imposing onto us..they want our support..so they can destroys us.. they should all remain in their big houses WHO CDC WEF UN.. UNDER GARD LOCKED IN BARRED IN ..WITHOUT FOOD WATER ELECTRICITY LIGHTING HEAT AND NO COMMUNICATION NO CANDLES NO FLASHLIGHTS FED INSECT PASTE AND RECYCLED URINE JUST LIKE THEY SAY THEY WANT US TO LIVE. LET THEM BE THE FIRST..GIVE UP THOSE BILLION DOLLAR HOMES AND VACATION VILLAS AND YAUHTS AND CARS AND PRIVATE JETS. LET THEM BE BAREFOOT BECAUSE THEY ARE SAYING EXERCISE IS RACIST NO SHOES AND NO BICYCLES..CLIMATE CHANGE BELIEVERS ARE SAYING TO DO ALL OF WHATS MENTIONED..DONT WAIT ON ME..FOLLOW YOUR OWN CONVICTIONS. YOU DONT NEED MY PARTICIPATION FOR ANY OF THIS.. VACINATION FOOD ANIMALS IN UNDER DEVELOPED COUNTRIES WHILE INSISTING ON FAUX MEATS AND BUG PROTEIN IN MORE DEVELOPED COUNTRIES..THESE PPL SHOULD BE FORCED FED WHAT THEY WANT ME TO EAT AND FORCED TO GO WITHOUT THE NECESSITIES OF RUNNING FRESH WATER HEAT AND NATURAL FOODS GRAINS PRODUCE AND ACTUAL MEAT.. DID I MISS ANYTHING ABOUT THESE HYPOCRITES?

  • Jeanne Brown
    Jeanne Brown

    God gives each human freedom that no other mere human has a right to take away. The audacity of pompous and immoral “elites”……. Enemies of God

  • jocelyn lavoie
    jocelyn lavoie

    Each pêrson have a right to choose the fundamental freedoms.

  • Michelle Kenyon
    Michelle Kenyon

    The IHR amendments must be stopped. This is nothing but global tyranny.

  • Julianne Benson
    Julianne Benson

    I do not give my advice and consent to these proposed amendments.

  • Linda Kajganic
    Linda Kajganic

    I have lost faith in the W.H.o.

  • Sharon Hickey
    Sharon Hickey

    I am signing because I fully agree with the concerns and request stated within.

  • Gillian Wilde
    Gillian Wilde

    I am signing because our human rights and freedoms are being taken away

  • Lisa Boshell
    Lisa Boshell

    Our countries choose our own constitution – we here in America demand our rights be upheld AS PER OUR DULY ENACTED CONSTITUTION.

  • Dianne Thomson
    Dianne Thomson

    I am signing because I do not want a one world government nor anyone telling me what I can & cannot do, & where I’m allowed to go. We the people did not vote for any of you. Anything to do with my health is between my dr & myself. How dare you group of psychopaths think your going to pull this off & get away with it. Your EVIL… everyone of you!!

  • Deborah Sacco
    Deborah Sacco

    It is the RIGHT action to do for all humanity.

  • Lynn Simpson
    Lynn Simpson

    I am signing because the unelected elites do not have the right to override our countries’ constitutional rights and even our Prime Minister, who works for Canadian people doesn’t have the legal right to allow foreign entities to come in and run our country. That would be treason.

  • Lisa Hangs
    Lisa Hangs

    We can decide our health on our own!

  • Mike Conroy
    Mike Conroy

    The proposed inclusions/amendments are a blatant attempt to strip the population of common fundamental human rights.

  • Mary Assaf
    Mary Assaf

    I am in total agreement with the opinions of IOJ and give my compete support to their open letter to the WHO and other above-mentioned organizations.

  • Janet Frye
    Janet Frye

    The issues addressed are not universal so general mandates would totally inappropriate. Human rights to autonomy and freedom are inherent and not to be superseded

  • Wanda Whitney
    Wanda Whitney

    I do not agree that our basic human rights are negotiable! We have not elected any of these people who want to make us like animals in a cage. Let them be the ones with recycled urine and bugs, not us. They need to see what the average person eats, drinks, works for a small salary, and does daily.

  • Teresa Graves
    Teresa Graves

    I do not want a world group make decisions for my country!

  • Anne Coles
    Anne Coles

    The WHO must stop interfering with human rights.

  • Diane Gregor
    Diane Gregor

    We the people of our world, do not want Who to make these amendments and reject all.

  • Ina Gabler
    Ina Gabler

    The WHO seeks world domination that would usurp other nations and states of their sovereignty and also to eviscerate human rights, including the right to choose or consent to medical treatments. The WHO’s charge is not to govern but to advise member nations. Mr. Tedros seeks tyrannical rule of global health yet has no medical training and is not an elected official. Any organization that seeks to deprive individuals and nations of their legal and natural rights is criminal.

  • Russell Jurkovich
    Russell Jurkovich

    I don’t want to become as slave of big or international governments, without human rights what rights do we have none.

  • Barbara
    Barbara

    I believe in respect for human dignity and fundamental freedoms, including individual bodily autonomy. I live in a democracy and do not want to be governed by the WHO or the UN or a one world government of any sort. This must not pass.

  • Sharon Southwood
    Sharon Southwood

    No one should have authority over medical choices of a competent individual. Pretty simple. Pretty alarming.

  • Douglas Dolleman
    Douglas Dolleman

    Stop The Proposed Amendments To The International Health Regulations (IHR) To Save Dignity, Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms!

  • David Rippel
    David Rippel

    The limited and biased information the WHO considers when evaluating international health issues should in no way infringe on the sovereignty or human rights of any nation on earth.

  • Carolyn Stoppard
    Carolyn Stoppard

    The WHO needs to work towards being trusted again. The WHO mandating anything now will not provide trust but will further erode trust.

  • Dustin Ranogajec
    Dustin Ranogajec

    This is and will be a violation of human rights! This Needs To Be Stopped!

  • Daphne Blake-Leavitt
    Daphne Blake-Leavitt

    I believe in human rights and freedoms.

  • Marleen Laska
    Marleen Laska

    Who gives the WHO the RIGHT to take sovereignty from countries?? Nothing…sovereign countries have ABSOLUTE power & authority to run their countries as they see fit according to their laws…NO GLOBALISM!!

  • Kylie Home
    Kylie Home

    It is not acceptable to remove dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms in the IHR or a treaty without extensive consultation with the whole of humanity.

  • Sylvia McBeal
    Sylvia McBeal

    I do not want my rights taken away

  • Pat Harney
    Pat Harney

    I support this letter.

  • Geoff mc kemey
    Geoff mc kemey

    I am a free human being and I will never give up my right to bodily autonomy.

  • Cheryl Carey
    Cheryl Carey

    Our freedoms can not be violated

  • Florence Trentacosti
    Florence Trentacosti

    I believe in freedom and dignity and self-determination of human beings.

  • Janice Pepperman
    Janice Pepperman

    I believe we are born free and our freedom comes from God.

  • Yvonne Breese
    Yvonne Breese

    I am signing because I support IOJ’s CRIMINAL Charges for crimes against humanity and breach of ethics against key W.H.O. Staff Director General and Chief Scientist (and her successor Jeremy Farrar). Support charges already filed (and not yet answered by WHO) for PCR fraudulent statistics, false declaration of pandemic that violates international law, as well as the unilateral and void definition of vaccine that allows gene therapy with unreasonable risks to be mislabelled globally as a vaccine, in excess of W.H.O. authority, knowing it cannot actually PREVENT DISEASE, required for all vaccines, to the detriment and harm of the international community and public interest.

  • Janet Eyring
    Janet Eyring

    I am signing to reverse

  • Ann Robinson
    Ann Robinson

    We want to retain our dignity, human rights, sovereignty and make our own HEALTH decisions.

  • Nancy Miller
    Nancy Miller

    I want USA to control USA!

  • Rachel Robertson
    Rachel Robertson

    The unelected people at this meeting have no right to speak for the entire world. You have not right to control or remove our human rights.

  • Lola Fuller
    Lola Fuller

    I am signing because the US has a Constitution that is not to be infri get, by enemies, foreign and domestic. My health is nobody’s damned business and all the so-called government can go to hell. I didn’t vote for them, didn’t vote for any of the current residents and I will NEVER COMPLY. Screw your damnable overreach!

  • Billy Markert
    Billy Markert

    First, it is not the right thing to do Second, there are not enough people voting on it.

  • Glenda Tice
    Glenda Tice

    I am signing because I value my sovereignty above all else!

  • Patricia Herrera
    Patricia Herrera

    I protest the IHR Amendments being negotiated THIS week that literally seeks to eliminate “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms”.

  • Kenneth David Peaker
    Kenneth David Peaker

    These criminal organizations and their political scoundrel handlers and co-conspirators are nothing more than a bunch of psychopathic hacks who view human life and all life as scum and trash to be organized and manipulated and disposed-of at their whim. The going’s on right now, today, place Lenin’s and Stalin’s and Mao’s and Pol Pot’s antics in a positive light, not to mention the U.S.’s entire historical record of absolute bullshit, you that deemed it prudent to drop nuclear weapons on unarmed civilians as a real-life test of nuclear weapons on a population, much like the bio-weapon crap happening right now.

  • Rian Ly ess
    Rian Ly ess

    Freedom Of choice

  • Thom Waters
    Thom Waters

    I am signing because it’s obvious that with these amendments the WHO is overstepping it’s bounds from one that makes recommendations to where it supersedes the inherent rights of the citizens of nation states who will then be under its rule. This goes against the tenets of our own constitution and as such having been voted on essentially in secret and without the input of the public on whom it will impact, it should be considered null and void.

  • Frank Rosse
    Frank Rosse

    I am signing to protect human dignity. We deserve to have our freedom protected from foreign interests.

  • Geraldine Candelaria
    Geraldine Candelaria

    The United States is an autonomous entity and should not sign the rights of its citizens regarding medical decisions to any entity including the World Health Organization.

  • Meagan Dick
    Meagan Dick

    I do not need the government involved in this kind of affair. Less government involvement, the better for Canadiana. We never voted for the world health organization.

  • Jackie Anderson
    Jackie Anderson

    I don’t believe that the unelected body of the W.H.O. has the right or authority to regulate health over individual people and nations.

  • Teresa Radek
    Teresa Radek

    This is not acceptable

  • Angie Stone
    Angie Stone

    I do not want my sovereignty and democracy denied by WHO.

  • Angela Fiddes
    Angela Fiddes

    I will not be dictated to by the WHO, it destroys national sovereignty.

  • Julie Gillespie
    Julie Gillespie

    I am against forced vaccinations and I am against ruling over individual country’s sovereignty.

  • Lorie Hovinga
    Lorie Hovinga

    I’m signing for Current and Future Generations

  • Kathryn Vestal
    Kathryn Vestal

    My government cannot surrender my health and bodily sovereignty. It is my right to accept or resist medical treatments of any kind.

  • Wayne Mckenzie
    Wayne Mckenzie

    There is no way one organization should demand they control me or any one country’s health care

  • Martin Wilson
    Martin Wilson

    Freedom of Choice is essential

  • R. Bruce Thorpe
    R. Bruce Thorpe

    They have no right to manipulate Human rights. Dignity and respect of must REMAIN in place.

  • Barb Schimpl
    Barb Schimpl

    There are so many things wrong with these amendments affecting us today and into the future forgnrratio s to come.

  • valerie ng
    valerie ng

    I’m human. It’s the right thing to do.

  • Carol Muise
    Carol Muise

    America is a sovereign country. No other entity or country should usurp our freedoms and laws.

  • Laurence Bailey
    Laurence Bailey

    I believe WHO should only be advisory and not have executive power over any country’s decision of operation.

  • Mary Roland
    Mary Roland

    I am signing because I want to stop the IHR Amendments being proposed!

  • Sue Dekany
    Sue Dekany

    Human rights can not be unilaterally reassigned to the WHO. I do not consent to new “rulers”.

  • Björn Elisson
    Björn Elisson

    I am a strong believer in democracy/ physical integrity and national sovereignty..

  • George Boucher
    George Boucher

    No agency outside the US government has a right to interfere with the constitutional rights of American citizens!

  • Irina Fedorov
    Irina Fedorov

    To protect human rights

  • George Boucher
    George Boucher

    No organization outside the United States government has the right to interfere with the freedoms of United States citizens!

  • Yali Boucher
    Yali Boucher

    No organization outside the United States government has the right to interfere with the freedoms of United States citizens!

  • Peggy Fitzpatrick
    Peggy Fitzpatrick

    I am resisting the takeover of my rights and the rights of all citizens of this world. What the WHO and others are doing is morally wrong.

  • Gerald Landry
    Gerald Landry

    THE WHO SHALL NOT TAKE OUR FREEDOMS

  • paul korteland
    paul korteland

    Een paar puntjes: – MSM zwijgt als het graf als Pfizer desgevraagd in het Europees Parlement erkent dat het vaccin niet is getest op transmissie van het virus. Dit wetende hebben ze , big pharma + politiek + mr. global, de mensheid besodemieterd. En toch nog het gore lef hebben om nog meer autoriteit te willen verwerven om onze gezondheid te “behartigen”. – WHO heeft geen idee van hoe de wereldwijde oversterfte kan zijn ontstaan. Puur toeval dat de het samenvalt met de massale vaccinaties? – Dit is een aanslag op onze grondwet waarover niet gestemd is. Dit is een misdaad. – door de eenzijdige aanpassing in 2009 door de WHO van de definitie van een pandemie hoeft een virus alleen maar besmettelijk te zijn. Dus ook al vallen er geen doden, en is er geen sprake van het uitbreken van een ernstige ziekte dan kan er toch een pandemie wordt uitgeroepen en zij we verplicht, als slaven, alle opdrachten van de WHO uit te voeren! Dit is het begin van het einde. Zeker als je bedenkt dat we meer virussen in ons lichaam meedragen dan dat we cellen hebben. – tot op heden is het virus sars-cov-2 nog nooit door iemand geïsoleerd en daarmede is het nog nooit aangetoond dat het bestaat. – Met een simpel Blue Tooth Low Energy appje kan je heel makkelijk aantonen met je mobieltje dat gevaccineerden voorzien zijn van een MAC-adres. Dit slaat toch alles.

  • Tina Waldmann
    Tina Waldmann

    THE WHO SHALL NOT TAKE OUR FREEDOMS

  • Thelma Landry
    Thelma Landry

    THE WHO SHALL NOT TAKE OUR FREEDOMS

  • Ernest Landry
    Ernest Landry

    THE WHO SHALL NOT TAKE OUR FREEDOMS

  • Nancy Stratton
    Nancy Stratton

    STOP THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION!!! THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION IS A CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE TRYING TO FORCE GLOBAL POLICIES ON AMERICA AND THE WORLD!! AMERICA WILL STAY FREE!!!!

  • Patricia Arkinstall
    Patricia Arkinstall

    Basic human rights

  • Dori Sullivan
    Dori Sullivan

    I need to protect myself from the greed and powerplays of individuals and corporations who really don’t know me and could care less about me. It’s all about lining their pockets and puffing up their egos. ENOUGH of this nonsense!

  • Paula Quercioli
    Paula Quercioli

    I am totally against these amendments! I actually think we should withdraw entirely from this treaty, and the WHO!

  • Susan Fry
    Susan Fry

    It is imperative to preserve Human Rights, dignity and fundamental freedoms. Vaccine passports and the like are wrong.

  • David Lintern
    David Lintern

    I am signing because I believe that every person on the planet should have the right to make all decitions regarding their own bodies and what medical treatment they want without being forced or coerced.

  • Victoria Chisham
    Victoria Chisham

    I AM SOVEREIGN

  • Sue Coleman
    Sue Coleman

    The WHO shouldn’t be deciding anything for anyone. I resist.

  • Dolores Walton
    Dolores Walton

    To oppose any agreement to the IHR amendments. We The People of this United States of America will retain our sovereignty from international law. The 76th World Health Assembly does not speak for the people of America. We The People have our Constitution, The Bill of Rights and The Declaration of Independence to guide this county and all it’s decision making about any health regulations needed to protect us.

  • Patrick O'Callaghan
    Patrick O'Callaghan

    These amendments should not happen

  • Sharon McGleenon
    Sharon McGleenon

    I am signing because I disagree with the WHO lack of transparency and push to take away peoples rights , dignity and freedoms to impose their will on them

  • Maia Dugan
    Maia Dugan

    We cannot allow the globalist elite to interfere on how Americans live. That it goes to far into our privacy. They want total control and say they are trying to protect us. This is the big lie about the pandemic. I believe they will kill more people with the vax eventually than the actual virus!!

  • Veronica Grimwood
    Veronica Grimwood

    I am signing because I totally believe in freedom of choice.

  • Janet Woodworth
    Janet Woodworth

    This IS against My personal freedom and 💯 Unconstitutional!! This is meant to Destroy Humanity!!

  • Carolyn Jankiv
    Carolyn Jankiv

    They are corrupt.

  • Yara Kauffmann
    Yara Kauffmann

    In standing for my sovereignty, our God given rights and individual free will. I am one with my Creator

  • Lynn McDonald
    Lynn McDonald

    I do not agree with the W.H.O. have such power over the world’s population. The W.H.O. was not consistent or reliable during Covid.

  • Derek von Bannisseht
    Derek von Bannisseht

    The WHO has no place in my health decisions.

  • Athena Bongard
    Athena Bongard

    I did not elect the WHO. I am sovereign and I deserve my dignity, my human rights and my fundamental freedoms as given to me as a USA citizens and the US Constitution.

  • Joan Lajeunesse
    Joan Lajeunesse

    I am signing because this is a complete disregard for the sovereignty of individual nation states

  • Melanie Ross
    Melanie Ross

    I disagree with these amendments. That the intent of this is to remove human rights and to take away an individual’s bodily autonomy. We as citizens of the world, have the right to make our own decisions, not be dictated to.

  • Amy Van Buskirk
    Amy Van Buskirk

    Our healthcare should NOT be governed by any international organization.

  • Nicolie O'Neill
    Nicolie O'Neill

    We have to stop the taking of human rights that have been fought for so hard over the centuries.

  • Michael Briskin
    Michael Briskin

    This is a travesty.

  • Dave Johnson
    Dave Johnson

    No one is able to make my healthcare decisions better than I.

  • Lynn Smith
    Lynn Smith

    I am signing because I do not want this tyranny to take place.

  • Heidi Javadi
    Heidi Javadi

    WHO is a dangerous venom and it’s insulting people’s intelligence. We are coming for you

  • Debbie Grace
    Debbie Grace

    Nobody world wide should have such power!

  • Anne Leduc
    Anne Leduc

    I beleive in freedom.

  • Jill Bargen
    Jill Bargen

    Conflict of interest is evident in the actions of these boards, it is inhuman to take away people’s freedoms while profiting and controlling without regard for human rights.

  • Lucinda Brennan
    Lucinda Brennan

    This plan forces AMericans to give up our sovereignty. We don’t want that decision being made FOR us – when most of the country isn’t even aware of the issue. The United States can make it’s own decisions!!!

  • Rebecca Mondorff
    Rebecca Mondorff

    Stop infringing on my rights as a sovereign human being living in the United States. We have had enough medical tyranny and will not comply with any more! Cease and desist immediately!

  • R. Hogge
    R. Hogge

    The last 3 years has shown the real story of why We The People need to stop this corrupted process and withdraw from The WHO and the UN.

  • Debra Curry
    Debra Curry

    I want my freedoms!

  • Sharon Hines
    Sharon Hines

    I do not believe the WHO should have control over my health or anyone else.

  • Vanessa Peregrym
    Vanessa Peregrym

    I prefer to have autonomy over my own body and I prefer my country to remain sovereign. I do not want evil people with an evil agenda to reign over us.

  • Teresa Temos
    Teresa Temos

    I believe in bodily autonomy, freedom of choice and a true democracy!!!

  • Beverly Mayo
    Beverly Mayo

    I strongly believe we need to respect & maintain our dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.

  • Heidi Clingen
    Heidi Clingen

    I am signing because Americans are sovereign and America is a sovereign nation. We do not take orders from foreign entities.

  • Dorothy Norris-Elye
    Dorothy Norris-Elye

    There are NO excuses for human rights abuses. Not even if you’re ‘only following orders’.

  • Marilyn Hogan
    Marilyn Hogan

    They need to stop trying to Control the World

  • Deb Hattin
    Deb Hattin

    I do not want any organisation I have not even voted for to subject me to medical tests, quarantine, medical procedures without my consent. I do not give consent for any of this to be done to me or my family for any illness or virus going around. I want the right to say yes or no to any medical intervention or quarantine.

  • Donna Rivet
    Donna Rivet

    The WHO is an unelected, privately funded corporate entity with strong ties to Big Pharma. This is Regulatory Capture on a scale the world has never seen before. I did not make any agreements or contracts or treaties with this corporate entity or these people. They have NO business with me, and are on notice to not interfere with me or my fundamental human rights, my constitutional rights, or my understanding of my nation’s sovereignty. I have no intention of being advised by them or dictated to by them. I have not given any politician or bureaucrats any prerogative to sign any contract with this corporate entity on my behalf either. The politicians and bureaucrats elected to political office in my country have been given no jurisdiction or prerogative to form any such ‘treaties’ with foreign corporate organizations, or to violate the sovereignty of this nation and our people by such agreements. Politicians doing so are abusing their political office. The WHO is a privately funded corporate organization self styling itself as a ‘world authority’. I do not recognize their grandiose claim.

  • Brandie Foote
    Brandie Foote

    I want Freedom for all from the WEF.

  • Wendy Llewellyn
    Wendy Llewellyn

    The WHO need to disappear – the chaos snd havoc they wreak is hitlerian in its evil

  • Zarayna Pradyer
    Zarayna Pradyer

    I am yet to be convinced that the amendments will be beneficial in the short, medium or long term for the majority of humanity.

  • Ruth Blackburn
    Ruth Blackburn

    I strongly object to the wielding of fraudulent authority, which is in direct violation of The United States Constitution, by the WHO, or any other foreign entity.

  • Geoffrey Knapp
    Geoffrey Knapp

    my trust in the IHR amendments is insufficient

  • Agnes Marko
    Agnes Marko

    I wish to live in a free independent nation and not be governed by foreign influence dictates!

  • Deborah Drew
    Deborah Drew

    Sovereignty is paramount.

  • Joan Simmons
    Joan Simmons

    I strongly object to the wielding of fraudulent authority, which is in direct violation of The United States Constitution, by the WHO, or any other foreign entity.

  • karen young
    karen young

    I don’t want this to become law!

  • Marlene Rock
    Marlene Rock

    I want to protect Human rights and freedoms.

  • Vivien Muir
    Vivien Muir

    People Around the world, and the countries they live in, must have the freedom to make their own choices, and not to be forced or coerced into solutions that do not benefit the people of this world. Stop seeking to control humanity within human agendas. Yours truly, Vivien in Canada.

  • HowardG Stone
    HowardG Stone

    General principle for human integrity

  • Bill Schmidt
    Bill Schmidt

    No international unelected governing body will ever take away my Medical rights enshrined in the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

  • ilana eberson
    ilana eberson

    I am signing because it’s our human right to have bodily autonomy and not leave it to some freakazoid group of unelected criminals to decide what we can and can’t do with our own bodies.

  • Elizabeth Boille
    Elizabeth Boille

    The W.H.O want to strip us here in Canada and around the world of everything including killing us off with forced Injections. We will be under there Totalitarian Power and control, No more sovereignty, Or Democracy. Will lock lock us down for something as minor as a cold.

  • Pamela Bennett
    Pamela Bennett

    No one governing body should have the power and control over the fine details and health of all the people of the world. It’s treason and hubris beyond compare . Human beings have a sovereign right to choose what to do with their own bodies regarding ANY health concern, regardless of what we power hungry mob yells ‘Emergency’

  • Paul Greenhalgh
    Paul Greenhalgh

    I am a sovereign being and exercise my right of choice.

  • Michael Principe
    Michael Principe

    Save human rights

  • Elizabeth Boille
    Elizabeth Boille

    I am signing because of the Totalitarian And power of the W.H.O. They want to control dictate our every move on this planet. Take away our choice to our autonomy. Take our rights and freedoms. They can call Pandemic for minor as a cold. Kill off the whole planet is their sick evil plan. They need to be charged with murder, and defunded asap.

  • Susan Miles
    Susan Miles

    I expect my dignity and human rights to be respected in public health emergencies. I don’t believe the W.H.O. should make decisions about what occurs in my community. You were not elected by anyone.

  • Ruth Doerr
    Ruth Doerr

    I am signing because I wish to uphold respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms.

  • John Willard
    John Willard

    I will not comply with your foolishness.

  • Valerie Lafrance
    Valerie Lafrance

    I believe the WHO is a captured organization, not working in the interests of humanity. All countries should call this out and defund the WHO.

  • Katherine Barfield
    Katherine Barfield

    I am very strongly opposed to these amendments and actions taken by the who to usurp our countries and citizens rights to their own healthcare decisions and choices!

  • Ian Stadler
    Ian Stadler

    I am signing because I dont want the WHO to have the amount of power over our freedom of choice that they are looking to have.

  • Cynthia Bradbury
    Cynthia Bradbury

    I am signing because I do not want the WHO to control our health, what we put into our bodies or any part of my life. There is absolutely no need for the WHo to have such control and power.

  • Mark Dale
    Mark Dale

    The people of every sovereign state never elected the WHO to decide upon anything let alone dictate.

  • R NS
    R NS

    This is an outrageous attempt to seize power by undermining the sovereignty of nations

  • DWAYNE KING
    DWAYNE KING

    Human Rights and Justice Now! Stop the Cruelty and Insanity Now! God Is Watching over his Creation! Democracy and constitutional and civil rights enshrined now!

  • Kelly Carlson
    Kelly Carlson

    Stop the amendments. They are ANTI-human rights!

  • Maureen Smith
    Maureen Smith

    We need to stop over regulation , and power grabs by government and other bodies to maintain the level of freedom most of us desire.

  • Valentin Stoyanov
    Valentin Stoyanov

    I don’t want ammendments to the International Health Regulations (IHR) To Save Dignity, Human Rights & Fundamental Freedoms!

  • Liona shareing
    Liona shareing

    this amendment takes away control and freedom

  • Frances Volpe
    Frances Volpe

    The IHR is a corrupt anti-human entity and I do not want to give them any power over the citizens of the USA and control over our health.

  • Judith Gogolin
    Judith Gogolin

    I believe in the sanctity of human life. I believe in human rights. I believe in freedom.

  • Judy Leman
    Judy Leman

    Every being is a sovereign being …..and so it is!!!!

  • Terry Blackburn
    Terry Blackburn

    I was born free to make my own choices. I will die standing free to defend them.

  • Deborah Pearce
    Deborah Pearce

    We need to stop this take over of our human rights.

  • Cristina Damato
    Cristina Damato

    I am signing because I believe there is no such thing as one size fits all for health. I believe nations and local regions need to make decisions on health issues based on local conditions.

  • Lora Chamberlain
    Lora Chamberlain

    The IHR amendments are horrific! The WHO must be disbanded! They failed during COVID miserably and some fool wants to give them even more power and money to fail again and again and again – not on my watch!

  • Joanne Hallenbeck
    Joanne Hallenbeck

    The US is a sovereign nation. I don’t want other entities mandating health issues . My body, my choice.

  • R Cadieux
    R Cadieux

    respect for individual rights

  • Charlie Hansen
    Charlie Hansen

    I want all my brothers and sisters of this world to remain free from tyranny.

  • Ulrich Gurzinski
    Ulrich Gurzinski

    For Human Rights

  • Ben Mason
    Ben Mason

    These proposed changes are an affront to every sovereign being on the planet.

  • Natalie Fenner
    Natalie Fenner

    Please respect our divine right to autonomy and the rights to informed personal choice.

  • Antonio Graneri
    Antonio Graneri

    Please respect our divine free will. We have fought wars to retain our freedom. This proposed bill is in direct opposition to our rights to Freedom.

  • kristina wiese
    kristina wiese

    i am a human being & not a number

  • Curt Odell
    Curt Odell

    I am signing because the WHO destroyed any shred of trust with their actions during COVID. The last thing we need is an Int’l organization making unilateral decisions for the U.S.

  • Sandra
    Sandra

    I am signing as it’s unlawful WHOARE CRIMINALS

  • James McKenzie
    James McKenzie

    I am signing because I believe these amendments constitute a fundamental attack on established human rights and freedom’s.

  • Michelle Starr
    Michelle Starr

    All of the world’s populations deserve to make their own decisions regarding their health and outcomes; our innate freedoms; and we the people do not need a world government body telling citizens of countries that those in the WHO have no information or idea as to how that country and it’s citizens operate. We are not stupid uneducated individuals…we know what is good for us and the WHO directives in the past by unelected beauracrats, especially during the alleged Covid pandemic, were absolutely unscientific, unnecessary and unwarranted, destroying countries and citizens lives by the millions…NO to the WHO

  • Brian Yates
    Brian Yates

    Eliminating the “respect for dignity, human rights and fundamental freedoms” shows us what the WHO really this of us – peasants to be ruled by the global elites.

  • Pauline R. King
    Pauline R. King

    Stop the Insanity! We answer to God! Not Big Pharma!

  • Dick Bartelse BARTELSE
    Dick Bartelse BARTELSE

    Ik teken omdat de uitleg precies aangeeft waar we terecht tegen moeten protesteren, dit mag niet doorgaan!

  • Pauline Collings
    Pauline Collings

    Why should the WHO control what we do in our lives… I strongly disagree with vaccine passports and I have been vaccinated

  • Pauline Collings
    Pauline Collings

    These amendments should be stopped

  • Kathryn Baxter
    Kathryn Baxter

    It is unconscionable that a single entity, let alone a single person, be imbued with unilateral authority to enslave the populations of the world’s various countries under the guise of medical conservancy, especially by means of secret and nefarious “negotiations” among rulers of those countries who do not necessarily represent the desires or true interests of those populations. The actions of the IHRRC, et al, in this matter is unequivocably global tyranny and a literal act orf war on humanity.

  • Valerie Cibic
    Valerie Cibic

    I do not want foreign powers dictating to the Australian men and women health policies which are against our 1901 Constitution which is designed to protect our Common Law rights.

  • Doug Hurley
    Doug Hurley

    Plainly this is an anti democratic move.

  • Ramón Martínez
    Ramón Martínez

    I’m signing because human LIFE and HEALTH, DIGNITY and FREEDOM must be saved from all the institutional criminals that are the global threat at this moment of history.

  • Judith Martinez
    Judith Martinez

    I am still against the amendments and am offended that once again the WHO is trying to take our authority by pushing these amendments through.

  • Heidrun von Koenen
    Heidrun von Koenen

    I am sign because I want to stop this crazyness – what are these people doing to us!

  • Kathleen Williams
    Kathleen Williams

    The WHO is now run by persons that intend to control our freedom and human rights.

  • Felice Baldi
    Felice Baldi

    my medical freedoms are important to me

  • Carol Blumenthal
    Carol Blumenthal

    I am signing because this is a thinly veiled attempted global coup by the WHO. The WHO has done nothing to promote human wellbeing. Our so-called representatives to the WHA were not mandated by us, the people of our country.

  • Margaret Ellis
    Margaret Ellis

    Because of freedom

  • Yuval kish
    Yuval kish

    My body my choice! And the the pharma will not decide!

  • Julie Goldring
    Julie Goldring

    I am signing because I do not feel this is a fair and just amendment – no one power should have all power over all nations, that is a dangerous game.

  • Del Carry
    Del Carry

    This has so many red flags and usurps the democracy of each country. The track record of the WHO in the last three years is abysmal and disgraceful as well.

  • Jim R Roberson
    Jim R Roberson

    It appears my freedom to make my own decisions regarding my health care are in great peril.

  • Kathy Reese
    Kathy Reese

    These amendments are not in our best interest.

  • Richard Provencher
    Richard Provencher

    I believe each individual person has human dignity which entitles that person to make their own health decisions.

  • Linda Hohn English
    Linda Hohn English

    I am signing because I’m not in agreement with the IHR ruling people with laws concerning travel or anything